Hypothesis simulation review
Skill panjose/Co-Scientist/skills/hypothesis-simulation-review
Simulate the hypothesis mechanism and identify failure scenarios.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add panjose/Co-Scientist --skill hypothesis-simulation-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.0 KB, 631 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
hypothesis-simulation-review
Goal:
- Simulate the hypothesis mechanism and identify failure scenarios.
Inputs:
research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.jsonhypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json- optional prior review artifacts for calibration
Outputs:
hypotheses/<id>/REVIEW/SIMULATION_REVIEW.json
Context Loading:
- Read
research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json. - Read
hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json. - Use prior reviews only as hints for likely weak spots; the simulation should still be an independent walk-through of the mechanism and validation path.
Execution Prompt Contract:
- System Intent:
- You are mentally simulating the hypothesis mechanism and proposed validation path step by step.
- Required Reasoning Focus:
- Break the mechanism into an ordered process.
- Identify where the process could fail and why.
- Distinguish inherent failures from contingent implementation issues where possible.
- Prioritize likely and fundamental failure scenarios over edge cases.
- Do Not Do:
- Do not generate abstract critique without a concrete simulated step.
- Do not flood the artifact with low-value edge cases.
- Do not replace the structured review with narrative prose.
- Review Quality Floor:
- A
status = completedsimulation review must include concrete mechanism or validation steps and concrete failure scenarios. - Steps must name hypothesis-specific materials, mechanisms, measurements, conditions, controls, or decision points.
- Do not use placeholder simulation steps such as
Synthesize evolved catalyst,Characterize structure,Test activity, orBenchmark against parentas substantive review content.
- A
- Output Shape:
- Produce the exact
SimulationReviewContractfrompackages/agent_contracts/review.pywith:stepsfailure_scenarios
- Keep each step and failure scenario concise and concrete.
- Each item in
stepsmust be a plain string, not an object with nested keys such asstep,description, orexpected_outcome. - Each item in
failure_scenariosmust be a plain string, not an object with nested keys such asscenario,likelihood, ormitigation.
- Produce the exact
Execution Steps:
- Open
skills/shared-references/schema-index.md, then readpackages/agent_contracts/review.pyand confirm the exactSimulationReviewContractshape before writingSIMULATION_REVIEW.json. - Read the research plan and hypothesis.
- Simulate the key mechanism or validation path step by step.
- Record the major steps.
- Identify likely and fundamental failure scenarios.
- Write
hypotheses/<id>/REVIEW/SIMULATION_REVIEW.json. - Validate before declaring completion.
Artifact Rules:
SIMULATION_REVIEW.jsonshould focus on the highest-signal failure modes.- The artifact should remain short enough for downstream summarization but concrete enough to guide revision.
Completion Rule:
- This skill is complete only when
SIMULATION_REVIEW.jsonexists and is valid for downstream synthesis.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.