agentsclimarketplace

Annu rev food

Skill PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition/journals/annu-rev-food

Open, MIT-licensed food & nutrition science research skills for Claude Code, Codex, and MiniMax Agent — multi-agent literature/systematic review, journal-aware writing, peer review, and figures, plus author-guideline skills for 150+ journals. Initiated by the Food Science Group, University of Melbourne.

Install
npx -y skills add PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition --skill annu-rev-food

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 25 days oldThe repository was created 25 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 17 stars17 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Author-guideline skill for Annual Review of Food Science and Technology (Annual Reviews, ISSN 1941-1413). Use to format or check an invited review for this journal — review structure, author–date Annual Reviews references, and figure specs. Triggers: submit to Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, Annual Reviews guidelines, invited food review formatting. Also fires when the user wants to publish on/in this journal, format a manuscript for it, or match its reference/citation style.

SKILL.md

3.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Annual Review of Food Science and Technology — Author Guideline Skill

Publisher: Annual Reviews · ISSN: 1941-1413 · Source: Journal page · Verified: 2026-07 (confirm at source).

Aims & scope

Authoritative, invited critical reviews across food science and technology: food chemistry, microbiology, engineering, safety, nutrition, and emerging technologies. Articles are commissioned by the Editorial Committee — unsolicited submissions are generally not accepted; propose topics to the editors first.

Article type

Review articles only (comprehensive, synthesis-driven, forward-looking). Typical length is substantial (often ~8,000–10,000 words); confirm the assigned length with the production editor.

Manuscript structure

Title → Authors & affiliations → Abstract → Keywords → Introduction → thematic sections with descriptive headings → Summary Points / Future Issues (Annual Reviews signature elements) → Disclosure Statement → Acknowledgments → Literature Cited. Provide "Summary Points" and "Future Issues" bullet lists.

  • Abstract: ~150–250 words.
  • Keywords: ~6–8.
  • Disclosure statement: required (funding, affiliations, potential bias).

Reference style

Author–date (name–year), Annual Reviews style. In-text (Author & Author 2023); "Literature Cited" list alphabetical. Article titles included.

Example:

Author AB, Author CD. 2023. Title of the review article. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 14:123–45

Figures & tables

Figures ≥300 dpi (line art higher); Annual Reviews uses professional redraw — supply clear, editable source files and permissions for any reused figures; RGB/CMYK per production; editable tables; cite in order.

Submission checklist

  • Topic pre-agreed/invited by the Editorial Committee · [ ] Summary Points + Future Issues lists
  • Abstract ~150–250 words · [ ] 6–8 keywords · [ ] Disclosure statement
  • Author–date (Annual Reviews) Literature Cited · [ ] Permissions for reused figures
  • Figures ≥300 dpi, editable source provided

Also covers — Annual Review of Nutrition

Same Annual Reviews format (invited only; author–date; Summary Points / Future Issues). Annual Review of Nutrition (ANNU REV NUTR) — invited comprehensive nutrition reviews.

Formatting constraints

journal: Annual Review of Food Science and Technology; Annual Review of Nutrition
publisher: Annual Reviews
submission: invited-only
reference_style: author-date-annual-reviews
abstract_words: 250
keywords_max: 8
required_elements: [summary_points, future_issues, disclosure_statement]
figure_dpi: {halftone: 300, line_art: 1000}

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.