agentsclimarketplace

Ship

Skill panda850819/verbs/skills/engineering/ship

Delivery route after coding work is complete and the user asks to ship, create a PR, or publish the branch. Run test, scope, and review gates; commit relevant files; push a non-default branch; then upsert the PR and available QA evidence. Unfinished work returns to its execution owner.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add panda850819/verbs --skill ship

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Ship

/ship closes completed code work through a pull request. Knowledge-note lifecycle and external publication remain host concerns. You already know how to write a commit; this skill is the gate sequence, not the coaching.

Gates (in order, none skippable silently)

  1. Config — read the ## verbs block from CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md for the test command, tag format, and release preference.
  2. Pre-flight — git pull; run the project's test/build command and STOP on failure with the output; inspect git diff --stat, git log origin/{main}..HEAD --oneline, and the current branch.
  3. Pitfall ack — search {learnings_dir} for type: pitfall entries whose files: touch changed files; a match must be listed and acknowledged before proceeding. Skip only what an earlier read this session already listed by this same query: an escalated review's RECALL block covers an entry only when it actually named it. Running review is not itself evidence — its recall ranks by topic-token overlap against title and tags, takes the top 3-5, and drops effective confidence below 3, so a pitfall naming a changed file can sit outside its results entirely. Same store, different query. Acknowledge the remainder here.
  4. Scope check — if a brief for this branch exists in docs/briefs/, compare the current full diff against its Scope In/Out and the diff at review time. Print Scope: ON TRACK, or SCOPE DRIFT: [...] / POST-REVIEW CHANGES: [...] and ask before proceeding. No brief → still warn on commits made after the last /review this session.
  5. Review gate — if /review has not run on the current diff this session, warn: "Review not run. Run /review first?" Proceed only on an explicit skip.
  6. Branch before commit (hard rule) — never push to main/master; always ship via PR. On main → create fix/* / feat/* / refactor/* BEFORE staging; a branch created after the commit still advances the local default branch.
  7. Commit — stage relevant files only (never git add -A); conventional message type(scope): description; empty git diff --cached after staging → report and skip the commit; never amend, never skip hooks.
  8. Tag / release (config-gated) — tag: semver → derive the bump from commits (feat = minor, fix = patch) and tag; release: true → GitHub Release from the tag with generated notes. Truth gate before publishing: every PR / SHA the notes cite must be an ancestor of the tag (git merge-base --is-ancestor), and added/removed claims must match git diff {prev-tag}..{tag} --stat — the notes describe what the tag contains, nothing more. On mismatch fix the notes, never re-tag. Otherwise skip both.
  9. Push + PR — push with -u (plus tags if created); gh pr create with a title under 70 chars and a what/why/how-to-test body. Resolve an existing PR instead of creating a duplicate.
  10. QA evidence upsert — when qa ran, read the handoff from the Git metadata path defined in lib/qa-evidence-format.md. Recompute its artifact identity against the PR head, then create or update the authenticated viewer's single marker comment. Read the comment back before reporting its URL. A stale artifact, malformed block, FAIL, or UNPROVEN row still gets published as Acceptance: NOT VERIFIED, but blocks a ready/done claim. For a UI diff that required qa, missing evidence also blocks completion. For non-UI work, state QA evidence: not applicable; never fabricate a report. Re-running ship updates the same comment rather than adding another.
  11. Artifact proof — before asking a human to validate an artifact or using manual validation as completion evidence, apply lib/verify-the-test-loop.md and prove that the tested artifact contains the current commit. Missing artifact identity blocks the completion claim.
  12. Closure evidence — done means the PR URL, pushed commit/branch, and, when QA ran, the verified QA comment URL are printed. Missing delivery evidence → name the gap and do not claim done.

Learning candidate

Emit ONE candidate only when a concrete artifact surfaced during this ship (a test that caught a subtle bug, a deploy pattern, a CI gotcha) — fields per lib/learning-format.md, quotes gated by @lib/quote-gate.md; storage belongs to the host/project. If a flaw maps to an existing Verbs skill — matched against that skill's anti-pattern/checklist table, not its trigger keywords — emit one skill-edit candidate: <skill> — <missing check> line for the host's session-end audit (see lib/trigger-first-skill-evolution.md). Propose-only: never edit the target skill here. Nothing surfaced → skip silently.

Common Rationalizations

Anti-bypass table tying each ship shortcut to the failure it causes: @lib/rationalizations.md.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 627,801. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.