agentsclimarketplace

Engineer agent loop

Skill Paldom/promptimize/skills/engineer-agent-loop

Agent Skills for prompt optimization - tune prompts for the latest frontier models like Fable 5 and GPT 5.6, write effective goals and success criteria, and engineer agentic loops that converge.

Install
npx -y skills add Paldom/promptimize --skill engineer-agent-loop

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 18 days oldThe repository was created 18 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Designs and diagnoses the control flow of agentic loops - pattern selection, supervisor-enforced caps and terminal states, no-progress detection, external verifier gates, context and compaction budgets, crash recovery. Use when an agent loop stalls, drifts, repeats itself, or never stops, or when building agent orchestration. Not for goal or prompt wording, ordinary code loops, or scheduled jobs.

SKILL.md

7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

engineer-agent-loop

The model is a fraction of a working agent; the loop around it does the rest. This skill designs that loop — or diagnoses one that stalls, repeats, drifts, or never stops — by putting control flow in code: bounded, externally verified, recoverable. Most agent failures are stopping-problem failures, and they are silent — no exception marks a loop that is busy going nowhere.

When NOT to use

  • The goal text is the problem (unverifiable condition, gameable done-state) → write-agent-goal. Identify the owning layer from evidence, not symptom alone: premature "done" can be a verifier bug (runtime) just as a vague goal can loop forever (text). Goal wording problems → there; missing caps, weak verifiers, broken recovery → here.
  • Prompt wordingoptimize-prompt. Comparing prompt variantsevaluate-prompts.
  • Ordinary programming loops — an infinite for loop or non-terminating recursion is a code bug, not loop engineering.
  • Scheduling — running something every N minutes is cron/interval-runner territory, not loop design.
  • Compound asks ("fix the goal AND cap the loop"): sequence them — goal text via write-agent-goal, enforcement here.

Workflow

  1. Pick the shape by path-knowability. Path unknown → ReAct; knowable and auditable → plan-and-execute with a replanner; fixed steps → hardcoded pipeline, no agent. Escalate to multi-agent only on an observed failure (context pressure, serial-latency wall, genuine heterogeneity) — and price it. Selection table and recipes: references/loop-patterns.md.
  2. Make termination supervisor-owned. Never let the model own stopping. Layer independent caps in code: iteration cap, wall-clock timeout, token/cost budget, cycle detection. Bounds must be effective — cumulative and session-wide; a local retry cap that an outer workflow re-enters bounds nothing. Define explicit terminal states — SUCCESS / FAILED / BUDGET_EXHAUSTED / CANCELLED — each reachable, each reported, with cancellation that works mid-run. Map every cap to a terminal reason (a wall-clock timeout is a reported TIMED_OUT/FAILED, never a silent exit); pre-flight budget checks must reserve worst-case output and in-flight concurrent spend; cancellation must also clean up still-running tool calls.
  3. Detect no-progress deterministically — and state-aware. Compare normalized tool calls against a task-state fingerprint: a repeated cycle with no state change is a loop; legitimate polling (results change) and a single backtrack are not. Tunable defaults: identical call 3× → exit with diagnostic; catch A→B→A oscillation; watch tokens climbing while state doesn't move; 3 failed fix attempts → escalate to a human. No LLM judge needed: references/reliability.md.
  4. Gate exits on external verification. Maker–checker split with a fresh-context verifier, framed adversarially ("try to disprove"); the verifier checks criteria only — never "verify and improve". A model verifier is a decorrelated probabilistic check, not proof — deterministic checks run first and remain the gate of record; evaluate the trajectory, not just the final answer.
  5. Budget the context like RAM. Target ~60–75% utilization (practitioner default — tune); compact at semantic boundaries with a pre-compaction flush to a state file; evict acted-on tool output instead of summarizing it; trim the tool registry. Full discipline: references/context-budget.md.
  6. Make it crash-safe. State files are the system of record for local artifacts — reconstruct from git log + progress file, never chat history. External side effects need more: write the intent record before acting and reconcile on resume (a crash between a side effect and its checkpoint is an unknown outcome), fence concurrent resumed supervisors with leases, and put idempotency keys on every side-effecting call — enforced receiver-side or in a durable dedup layer; the key alone is a request, not a guarantee. Budget breach = checkpoint with partial work preserved, not a cliff.
  7. Test the loop before trusting it. Run it against: a mocked model that always wants another iteration; a verifier that always rejects; a verifier that hangs; budget exhaustion at exact boundaries; kill-and-restart mid-run; forced compaction immediately before completion. Supervisor caps must hold against every one of them.

Output spec

For a design: pattern + rationale, a cap table with concrete values, terminal states, verifier gates, the context plan, and the recovery plan — plus the step-7 test list for anything that will run unattended. For a diagnosis: the failure family, the trace evidence, the specific missing control, and the fix. $ARGUMENTS, when present, is the loop or symptom to work on.

Gotchas

  • Prompt-level caps are advisory: ~38% of confirmed infinite agentic loops had model-controlled stop conditions (arxiv.org/abs/2607.01641).
  • A correct-looking final answer can sit on top of wrong state — trajectory evaluation catches what final-answer checks miss.
  • Reflection without an external verifier rubber-stamps its own work; cap reflection rounds — the gains land in the first one or two.
  • Multi-agent wins are real and expensive: the oft-quoted 90.2% improvement was one internal Anthropic eval and cost ~15x the tokens. Quote the scope and the cost with the win.
  • Everything the loop reads — repo files, tool output, retrieved pages — is untrusted input to both maker and verifier; injection can subvert an LLM checker. Least-privilege tool scopes, sandboxed side effects, human approval for irreversible actions, and secrets kept out of traces and state files are part of the loop design, not extras.
  • Per-step reliability compounds: 0.95^20 ≈ 36% (arithmetic, not a provider stat) — shorten chains and verify per step.
  • Compaction silently drops exact numbers, negations, and ruled-out approaches — use a fixed summary schema and flush state before compacting.

Pointers

  • references/loop-patterns.md — pattern selection, canonical citations, plan-and-execute recipe, reflection discipline, multi-agent criteria, the Ralph prior art and its critique.
  • references/reliability.md — caps in code, effective bounds, budget mechanics, no-progress detection, hooks and idempotency, verification gates, compounding math, incidents-to-regression-tests.
  • references/context-budget.md — window-as-RAM, the four levers with correct attribution, eviction, compaction discipline, external state, version-gated platform facts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.