Issue pr templates
Agent Skills for professional GitHub repos - brief, structured, SEO-friendly READMEs that convert visitors into users, plus complete OSS scaffolding: community health files, templates, and discoverability best practices.
npx -y skills add Paldom/github-skills --skill issue-pr-templatesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Builds structured GitHub contribution intake - YAML issue forms with required fields and auto-labels, config.yml routing, a pull request template with a working checklist, and starter labels like good first issue. Use when the user asks for issue templates, bug report forms, a PR template, or to stop blank issues. Not for CONTRIBUTING or other prose community files, and not for issue triage.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
issue-pr-templates
Builds the structured intake layer that turns "it's broken, please fix" into
actionable reports. The failure this skill fixes: models write legacy Markdown
issue templates (no required fields), get the YAML forms schema subtly wrong
(forms silently don't render), and forget config.yml routing entirely.
When NOT to use
- CONTRIBUTING/SECURITY/SUPPORT prose files →
community-health. - Triaging or closing existing issues, stale-bot automation → out of scope.
- Requiring PR reviews/checks before merge →
repo-protections. - Configuring GitHub Discussions itself → out of scope (linking to it is in scope).
Workflow
- Read
references/issue-forms-reference.mdfor the exact schema and the annotated examples — do not write forms from memory. - Issue forms in
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/:bug_report.yml— required version + repro-steps fields, environment dropdown where sensible,render: shellfor logs, auto-labelbug.feature_request.yml— problem-first fields (what/why before how), labelenhancement.- Only
.yml/.yamlfiles in that exact directory render; forms only work on the default branch.
config.yml:blank_issues_disabled: truepluscontact_linksrouting questions to Discussions/SUPPORT and security reports to private reporting — never to a public issue form.- PR template: single
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, short actionable checklist (tests run, docs updated, linked issue, no.local/secret files). If multiple PR templates are requested: GitHub has no picker UI — explain the?template=name.mdquery-param workaround and recommend one good default. - Labels: create the ones the forms reference plus the newcomer set:
gh label create "good first issue" --color 7057ff --description "Good for newcomers" --force gh label create "help wanted" --color 008672 --description "Extra attention is needed" --forcegood first issueis surfaced algorithmically by GitHub to newcomers — use it honestly or it backfires. - Validate (deterministic gate):
It runsbash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/validate_forms.sh"check-jsonschema --builtin-schema vendor.github-issue-formsagainst every form (pinned install if missing) and fails on schema violations.
Output spec
Forms + config.yml + PR template in .github/, schema-valid (script exits 0),
every referenced label exists, required fields limited to what reporters can
actually answer (required-everything forms deter reports).
Gotchas
config.ymlis not an issue form — it has a different schema; never pass it to the forms validator (the script already excludes it).- A form that doesn't render usually means: wrong directory,
.mdinstead of.yml, not on the default branch, or a schema violation — check in that order. - Every
idmust be unique and[a-z0-9-_];labelvalues inside body elements are user-visible — write them as questions a reporter understands. - Right-size: a solo project with 2 issues/month needs one bug form at most; elaborate intake before there's traffic is friction without benefit.
Files
references/issue-forms-reference.md— schema, annotated examples, config.yml, PR template, label set, validation command.scripts/validate_forms.sh— schema validation with pinned check-jsonschema; non-zero exit on invalid forms.