Proposal gen
Skill pagoda111king/claude-code-pack/template/.claude/skills/proposal-gen
Generate client proposals from discovery call notes. Use after lead-intake verdict is 🟢. Outputs a branded, price-free proposal for the client (pricing sent separately in a follow-up email).From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add pagoda111king/claude-code-pack --skill proposal-genAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
6.6 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Proposal Generator
When to Use
skills/lead-intakeoutputs a verdict of 🟢 (≥22 points)- Must be sent to the client within 48 hours
- Never write a proposal without conducting an interview first (that's bidding, not consulting)
Inputs
clients/<client-name>/discovery-<date>.md(interview notes)docs/brand-voice.md(if it exists; otherwise use the default fallback voice)- Relevant case studies:
products/case-studies/*.md(if used)
the methodology source Proposal Philosophy
- Start with their pain, not your features
- Evidence > promises: use specific client quotes, numbers, screenshots
- No pricing in the proposal: the proposal converges scope; the follow-up email discusses money separately
- Length < 1500 words: B2B decision-makers won't read long documents
- Give a clear "next step": don't make the client figure out what to do next
Standard Structure (8 Sections)
# <Project Name> · Proposal
To: <Client Name / Company>
From: <You> · <Date>
---
## 1. The Problem I Heard (Use Client's Own Words)
You mentioned on <date>:
> "<Quote 1 · specific scenario>"
> "<Quote 2 · urgency>"
My understanding is: **<one-sentence problem summary>**. If this is off, please let me know in your reply.
## 2. Why Solve It Now
Based on the <trigger event> you mentioned, if this problem continues,
**you're losing roughly X hours / Y dollars per week** (estimated from the data you provided).
## 3. My Proposed Solution
A <product type: tool / dashboard / automated workflow / SaaS> that specifically:
- **Core Feature 1**: <what it does, which pain point it addresses>
- **Core Feature 2**: ...
- **Core Feature 3**: ...
**What's out of scope** (to prevent scope creep):
- Not doing <out-of-scope A>
- Not doing <out-of-scope B>
## 4. Delivery Timeline
| Phase | Deliverable | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 · Core Working | <specific feature> | Weeks 1-2 |
| Phase 2 · Full Experience | <specific feature> | Weeks 3-4 |
| Phase 3 · Launch & Wrap | Monitoring / Docs / Training | Week 5 |
Weekly sync every Friday. A 30-minute demo after each phase.
## 5. Why Me
<1-2 paragraphs, referencing brand voice for personal introduction>
- Relevant experience: <1-2 items, ideally with links or verifiable results>
- Technical leverage: primarily use Claude Code for AI-native development, delivering at roughly 3-5x the speed of traditional outsourcing
- <Optional: one client testimonial from a delivered case study>
## 6. What I Need From You
- At project kickoff: <one 1-hour alignment meeting>
- Weekly: <30-minute weekly sync>
- Data / API access: <specific resources you need to provide. Must be explicit to avoid later disputes>
## 7. Next Steps
If this direction feels right, I suggest we:
1. **This week**: schedule a 30-minute call to finalize scope (I'll bring a draft)
2. **By Monday**: send you the SOW (including pricing, payment schedule, IP ownership)
3. **Upon SOW confirmation + 30% deposit**: kick off
If the direction is off, please say so. I can revise.
---
Attachments:
- <Optional: one-page relevant case study>
- <Optional: one-page technical architecture diagram>
<Your signature · WeChat / Email>
Generation Process
- Read interview notes:
clients/<client-name>/discovery-<date>.md - Read brand voice:
docs/brand-voice.md(if it doesn't exist, prompt the founder to create it first) - Read 1-2 relevant case studies:
products/case-studies/*.md - Generate using the 8-section structure above
- Checklist:
- Quoted ≥2 client statements
- "Out of scope" is explicitly stated
- Each of the three phases has a deliverable
- No pricing numbers
- Total word count < 1500
- Next steps are concrete (with time anchors)
- Output to
clients/<client-name>/proposal-v1-<date>.md - Simultaneously generate a follow-up email (separate file
clients/<client-name>/proposal-quote-v1-<date>.md), containing pricing + payment schedule + optional add-ons
Pricing (Follow-up Email)
Two tiers plus one optional add-on:
Addendum: On Pricing
Based on the delivery scope, here are my rates:
**Standard Plan**: <price> CNY
- Includes: Phase 1 + Phase 2 + Phase 3
- Payment: 30% deposit to start / 50% upon Phase 2 completion / 20% after acceptance
- Delivery timeline: 5 weeks
**Lite Plan** (if budget is tight): <price × 0.6> CNY
- Includes: Phase 1 + Phase 2 (excluding monitoring/training)
- Payment: 50% deposit / 50% upon acceptance
- Delivery timeline: 4 weeks
**Optional Add-on** (6-month maintenance): <monthly price> CNY/month
- Includes bug fixes, minor feature iterations, one 30-minute consultation per month
Let me know your rough budget range, and we'll settle on the best plan.
Common Pitfalls
- Don't offer 5 price tiers: too many options = decision paralysis. Two tiers plus one optional add-on, max.
- Don't send a 10-page PPT on the first contact: a 1500-word Word doc or markdown is best. A PPT signals you're trying to look like a big company.
- Don't skip the "out of scope" section: skipping it guarantees scope creep later.
- Don't promise uncertain timelines: before writing "5 weeks," break it down with a planner yourself.
Prohibited
- Sending the same template with just the client name swapped (the methodology source philosophy: brand voice makes it obvious if it's copied)
- Using buzzwords like "empower," "ecosystem," "closed loop" in the proposal
- Writing a proposal without conducting an interview
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.