Proposal gen
Skill pagoda111king/claude-code-pack/template/.claude/skills/proposal-gen
Claude Code config pack · 11 agents · 10 skills · 10 commands · 4 hooks · CLAUDE.md template · Solo Founder OS
npx -y skills add pagoda111king/claude-code-pack --skill proposal-genAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Generate client proposals from discovery call notes. Use after lead-intake verdict is 🟢. Outputs a branded, price-free proposal for the client (pricing sent separately in a follow-up email).
SKILL.md
6.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Proposal Generator
When to Use
skills/lead-intakeoutputs a verdict of 🟢 (≥22 points)- Must be sent to the client within 48 hours
- Never write a proposal without conducting an interview first (that's bidding, not consulting)
Inputs
clients/<client-name>/discovery-<date>.md(interview notes)docs/brand-voice.md(if it exists; otherwise use the default fallback voice)- Relevant case studies:
products/case-studies/*.md(if used)
the methodology source Proposal Philosophy
- Start with their pain, not your features
- Evidence > promises: use specific client quotes, numbers, screenshots
- No pricing in the proposal: the proposal converges scope; the follow-up email discusses money separately
- Length < 1500 words: B2B decision-makers won't read long documents
- Give a clear "next step": don't make the client figure out what to do next
Standard Structure (8 Sections)
# <Project Name> · Proposal
To: <Client Name / Company>
From: <You> · <Date>
---
## 1. The Problem I Heard (Use Client's Own Words)
You mentioned on <date>:
> "<Quote 1 · specific scenario>"
> "<Quote 2 · urgency>"
My understanding is: **<one-sentence problem summary>**. If this is off, please let me know in your reply.
## 2. Why Solve It Now
Based on the <trigger event> you mentioned, if this problem continues,
**you're losing roughly X hours / Y dollars per week** (estimated from the data you provided).
## 3. My Proposed Solution
A <product type: tool / dashboard / automated workflow / SaaS> that specifically:
- **Core Feature 1**: <what it does, which pain point it addresses>
- **Core Feature 2**: ...
- **Core Feature 3**: ...
**What's out of scope** (to prevent scope creep):
- Not doing <out-of-scope A>
- Not doing <out-of-scope B>
## 4. Delivery Timeline
| Phase | Deliverable | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 · Core Working | <specific feature> | Weeks 1-2 |
| Phase 2 · Full Experience | <specific feature> | Weeks 3-4 |
| Phase 3 · Launch & Wrap | Monitoring / Docs / Training | Week 5 |
Weekly sync every Friday. A 30-minute demo after each phase.
## 5. Why Me
<1-2 paragraphs, referencing brand voice for personal introduction>
- Relevant experience: <1-2 items, ideally with links or verifiable results>
- Technical leverage: primarily use Claude Code for AI-native development, delivering at roughly 3-5x the speed of traditional outsourcing
- <Optional: one client testimonial from a delivered case study>
## 6. What I Need From You
- At project kickoff: <one 1-hour alignment meeting>
- Weekly: <30-minute weekly sync>
- Data / API access: <specific resources you need to provide. Must be explicit to avoid later disputes>
## 7. Next Steps
If this direction feels right, I suggest we:
1. **This week**: schedule a 30-minute call to finalize scope (I'll bring a draft)
2. **By Monday**: send you the SOW (including pricing, payment schedule, IP ownership)
3. **Upon SOW confirmation + 30% deposit**: kick off
If the direction is off, please say so. I can revise.
---
Attachments:
- <Optional: one-page relevant case study>
- <Optional: one-page technical architecture diagram>
<Your signature · WeChat / Email>
Generation Process
- Read interview notes:
clients/<client-name>/discovery-<date>.md - Read brand voice:
docs/brand-voice.md(if it doesn't exist, prompt the founder to create it first) - Read 1-2 relevant case studies:
products/case-studies/*.md - Generate using the 8-section structure above
- Checklist:
- Quoted ≥2 client statements
- "Out of scope" is explicitly stated
- Each of the three phases has a deliverable
- No pricing numbers
- Total word count < 1500
- Next steps are concrete (with time anchors)
- Output to
clients/<client-name>/proposal-v1-<date>.md - Simultaneously generate a follow-up email (separate file
clients/<client-name>/proposal-quote-v1-<date>.md), containing pricing + payment schedule + optional add-ons
Pricing (Follow-up Email)
Two tiers plus one optional add-on:
Addendum: On Pricing
Based on the delivery scope, here are my rates:
**Standard Plan**: <price> CNY
- Includes: Phase 1 + Phase 2 + Phase 3
- Payment: 30% deposit to start / 50% upon Phase 2 completion / 20% after acceptance
- Delivery timeline: 5 weeks
**Lite Plan** (if budget is tight): <price × 0.6> CNY
- Includes: Phase 1 + Phase 2 (excluding monitoring/training)
- Payment: 50% deposit / 50% upon acceptance
- Delivery timeline: 4 weeks
**Optional Add-on** (6-month maintenance): <monthly price> CNY/month
- Includes bug fixes, minor feature iterations, one 30-minute consultation per month
Let me know your rough budget range, and we'll settle on the best plan.
Common Pitfalls
- Don't offer 5 price tiers: too many options = decision paralysis. Two tiers plus one optional add-on, max.
- Don't send a 10-page PPT on the first contact: a 1500-word Word doc or markdown is best. A PPT signals you're trying to look like a big company.
- Don't skip the "out of scope" section: skipping it guarantees scope creep later.
- Don't promise uncertain timelines: before writing "5 weeks," break it down with a planner yourself.
Prohibited
- Sending the same template with just the client name swapped (the methodology source philosophy: brand voice makes it obvious if it's copied)
- Using buzzwords like "empower," "ecosystem," "closed loop" in the proposal
- Writing a proposal without conducting an interview