Dsl

DSL — Domain-Shared Lexicon

A focused skill with one job: align the vocabulary between you (the AI) and the user for the domain they work in. Nothing else. Not plan reviews, not ADRs, not design decisions — only the words and what they mean.

Why this exists

When the user says "the order is rejected" they may mean a specific lifecycle state with downstream effects. When you (the AI) hear "order" you may default to a generic e-commerce meaning. Drift compounds: code uses one name, comments another, the user a third, and you a fourth. The lexicon collapses all of that into a single source of truth that everyone — including future-you in a fresh session — references.

Scope (read this twice)

The lexicon stores domain terms and what they mean. That is the whole scope.

• ✅ Term → definition → aliases to avoid
• ✅ Relationships between terms ("an Invoice belongs to one Customer")
• ✅ Flagged ambiguities (same word used for two things)
• ❌ Not architecture decisions (those go in ADRs)
• ❌ Not design plans, PRDs, or feature specs
• ❌ Not coding conventions or style rules
• ❌ Not "how to use this codebase"

If you find yourself writing how a feature works, you've drifted. Stop and put it elsewhere.

Where lexicons live

Scope	Path	Applies to
Project	./LEXICON.md	This project only
Global	~/.claude/LEXICON.md	The user's recurring domains across all their projects

The global file is not one big bag — it is a collection of per-domain sections, each with explicit Applies when: signals. At session start, you match the current project against those signals and load only matching domains. A user whose primary work is metal smelting should not get smelting vocabulary auto-loaded into a recipe app side project.

See templates/lexicon-template.md for the canonical structure.

Three ways this skill runs

1. On demand (the /dsl-init, /dsl-update, /dsl-ingest commands)

The user explicitly asks. Run the matching command's flow.

2. Proactive mid-conversation

You're working on something else and notice a term being used in two senses in the same conversation, or a domain term the user uses confidently that you cannot define. When this happens:

1. Don't derail. Finish the user's current ask first if it's mid-flight.
2. At a natural pause, raise the ambiguity in one short sentence: "Quick check — 'account' has come up meaning both the paying customer and a login identity. Worth adding to LEXICON.md to keep us aligned? (or /dsl-update later)"
3. If the user says yes, run the update flow on just that term. If no or silence, drop it — do not nag.

Threshold for raising: real ambiguity or genuine unknown, not stylistic preference. Do not interrupt for terms that have one clear meaning in context.

3. At session start (auto-detection)

When loaded via CLAUDE.md at the start of a session:

1. If ./LEXICON.md exists, treat it as in scope unconditionally. It is loaded via the project CLAUDE.md @import.
2. If ~/.claude/LEXICON.md exists, use the Read tool to load it (do not rely on @import — see "Why no global @import" below). Parse each ## Domain: section's Applies when: block and evaluate against the current project (see "Matching the project to a global domain"). Mentally apply only matching sections. Ignore the rest as if they weren't there.
3. When precedence collides (a term defined in both project and a matching global domain), the project definition wins. Note the divergence to the user once: 'Heat' has both global and project definitions — using the project one.
4. Acknowledgement — in your first substantive response, emit exactly one line of the form Lexicon loaded: <N> terms (project: ./LEXICON.md, global: <matched-domain>). Omit any source that contributed zero. Skip the line entirely if nothing loaded.
5. If neither matches and the project shows clear domain-specific signals (specialized jargon in README, narrow industry deps), make a one-time, one-line offer in your first substantive response: This project has domain-specific terminology — want to build a lexicon? Run /dsl-init. Do not offer again in the same session if declined.
6. If the project is generic / off-domain (todo apps, recipe apps, generic CRUD with no specialized vocabulary, AND no global domain matches), say nothing. Silence is the right behaviour here.

Why no global @import

@~/.claude/LEXICON.md in ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md would load the entire global lexicon into context every session, including off-domain vocabulary. That defeats the matching guarantee — a metallurgist's smelting terms would still enter context when they open a recipe app. Instead, the global CLAUDE.md snippet asks you to Read the lexicon at session start and filter by Applies when: yourself. Off-domain terms never enter context.

Matching the project to a global domain

Each ## Domain: section in ~/.claude/LEXICON.md declares Applies when: signals. Evaluate them with this priority:

1. Explicit override — if a line matching the regex ^\s*domain:\s*<name>\s*$ appears in the project's ./CLAUDE.md, or as the first non-blank, non-heading line of ./LEXICON.md, use that. Skip detection.
2. Strong signal — README mentions 2+ named keywords from the domain's Applies when: list, OR project deps (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) include declared domain libraries.
3. Weak signal — file/dir names match declared patterns, OR domain-specific file extensions are present.

Load a global domain only when strong signal OR explicit override matches. Weak signals alone are not enough — they cause false positives across unrelated projects.

When in doubt, prefer not loading over polluting context with off-domain vocabulary. The user can always invoke /dsl-init to force-attach a global domain to the current project.

Building the lexicon (the interview flow)

When invoked via /dsl-init or when the user accepts the proactive offer:

Step 0 — Pick the scope

Ask once: Is this lexicon for this project only, or part of your recurring domain across projects? (Options: project / global-new-domain / global-add-to-existing.) Use AskUserQuestion if available.

Step 1 — Gather raw material

Ask once: How should we extract terms? Options:

• interview — I ask you questions
• ingest — you point me at a file, URL, or paste (docs, transcripts, existing glossaries, code)
• scan — I scan this repo's README.md, any GLOSSARY.md/TERMS.md-style files, and directory names
• hybrid — combine the above

For ingest: ask for the source. Read it. Extract candidate terms. For scan: read the project's README.md and any file with a glossary-shaped name at the project root or one level deep (GLOSSARY.md, TERMS.md, LEXICON.md, DICTIONARY.md). Also use the directory tree (names only, not file contents) as a hint for domain. Extract candidates. Do not read docs/, CONTRIBUTING.md, ADRs, design docs, or source code — those describe how the system works, which is out of scope. If the user wants terms extracted from a design doc, they should ingest it explicitly so they're aware that's a deliberate widening of scope.

Step 2 — Interview the user

Ask one question at a time. Prefer AskUserQuestion with 2-4 concrete options + Other.

Cover only:

• For each candidate term: What does <Term> mean here, in one sentence?
• For each apparent synonym pair: Are <A> and <B> the same thing, or different?
• For each ambiguous term: When you say <X>, do you mean <interpretation A> or <interpretation B>?
• For each known industry term the user uses confidently but you don't know: Quick — what is a <Term> in your domain?

You are an interviewer, not an executor. Do not start coding, refactoring, or restructuring anything as a side effect. The deliverable is the lexicon, full stop.

Stop when:

• All ambiguities are resolved
• All candidate terms have one-sentence definitions
• The user says "enough" / "wrap up"

10–15 terms is a normal first pass. Don't pad.

Step 3 — Write the file

Before writing, always show the proposed lexicon contents to the user and confirm. Never write a LEXICON.md silently.

Write ./LEXICON.md (or update ~/.claude/LEXICON.md for global). Follow templates/lexicon-template.md exactly. Group terms into tables by natural cluster (lifecycle / actors / artifacts). Include the Flagged ambiguities and Example dialogue sections.

For a new global domain, populate the Applies when: block carefully — these signals decide future auto-loading. Be specific: deps, README keywords, file patterns. Vague signals cause false positives.

Empty-lexicon guard: if the interview / ingest / scan yielded fewer than 2 terms (or no real ambiguities), do not write a file. Tell the user: Not enough domain-specific terms for a lexicon — skipping. Run /dsl-init again when you have more material.

Step 4 — Wire it up

Check the relevant CLAUDE.md. Always confirm with the user before writing or modifying their CLAUDE.md. Never write a CLAUDE.md file without first showing the user the snippet you intend to append.

• Project: check if ./CLAUDE.md already references ./LEXICON.md via @./LEXICON.md. If not, propose appending the snippet from templates/claude-md-snippet-project.md. If ./CLAUDE.md doesn't exist, propose creating one containing only that snippet.
• Global: check if ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md already contains the global lexicon block. If not, propose appending the snippet from templates/claude-md-snippet-global.md. If ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md doesn't exist, propose creating one containing only that snippet.

Project lexicon loading: the project snippet uses @./LEXICON.md, so the whole file enters context every session — that's the intended behaviour (project lexicons always apply). If the project lexicon is large enough to be a context concern (say, over 500 lines), tell the user; consider splitting by sub-domain into separate files referenced from ./LEXICON.md.

Global lexicon loading: the global snippet does not use @import — it instructs you to Read and filter at session start. This keeps off-domain vocabulary out of context.

Step 5 — Confirm

State, in one line: Wrote <path>: <N> terms in <M> domains. CLAUDE.md updated. Do not summarize the contents — the file is the artifact.

Updating an existing lexicon (/dsl-update)

1. Read the existing file
2. Ask the user what to add / fix / disambiguate
3. Run a tight interview only on those terms
4. Rewrite the file in full (no diff markers in the file itself — git handles history)
5. Confirm

When invoked because of a proactive ambiguity catch (mode 2 above), skip Step 2 and go straight to the specific term.

Ingesting external material (/dsl-ingest)

1. Accept: file path, URL, or pasted text
2. Read it
3. Extract domain-relevant noun phrases (X is a ..., we call this a ..., repeated capitalized terms, acronyms with expansions)
4. Skip generic programming concepts (array, function, endpoint) unless they have domain-specific meaning here
5. Present candidates in a short list with proposed definitions drawn from the source
6. Let the user accept / edit / reject each
7. Continue to Step 3 of the interview flow (write the file)

For URLs, prefer WebFetch. For PDFs and Office files, ask the user to convert or paste the relevant section — do not assume a converter is installed.

Rules of the format

These rules apply when you write any lexicon file:

• Be opinionated. When multiple words exist for the same concept, pick one and list the others under Aliases to avoid.
• Tight definitions. One sentence. Define what something is, not what it does.
• Bold term references. When a definition mentions another term in the lexicon, bold it: **Customer**. This makes relationships obvious.
• Group when natural, single table when not. Don't force subgroups onto a 5-term lexicon.
• Only domain terms. Skip framework/language jargon unless it has domain-specific meaning here.
• Flag ambiguities explicitly. If the source material used a term in two senses, surface it in ## Flagged ambiguities with a clear recommendation.
• One example dialogue. A 3–5 line exchange that shows the terms used precisely in context.

What you must not do

• Do not generate ADRs, design docs, PRDs, or feature specs as part of this skill.
• Do not refactor code or rename identifiers as a side effect of building a lexicon. Note the divergence, surface it to the user, and stop.
• Do not auto-load a global domain whose Applies when: signals don't match.
• Do not pad the lexicon with terms just to look thorough. If a term has no real ambiguity and no special domain meaning, leave it out.
• Do not interrupt the user's current task to volunteer a lexicon update. Wait for a natural pause.