Creo ux competitor

Competitor UX Analysis

Analyze external competitor websites to extract UX insights and learnings. Navigates competitor sites as a real user, documents their UX patterns, evaluates against professional standards, and identifies opportunities for differentiation.

Commands

Command	Description
/creo ux-competitor <url>	Analyze a single competitor website
/creo ux-competitor compare <url1> <url2>	Compare two competitor websites

Core Instructions

Configuration

1. Check for project-specific config at .claude/project-config.md
2. Read competitors (pre-configured list by tier), reports_path
3. Load project extension if it exists at .claude/skills/creo-ux-competitor/creo-ux-competitor-{project_id}.md. This file contains project-specific competitor list, positioning, differentiators, and analysis focus areas. {project_id} comes from project-config.md. Always load it before doing work.
4. If no config exists, ask user for competitor URL

Phase 1: Competitor Research

Before navigating, gather background info via web search:

• Company background and target audience
• Key features and value proposition
• User reviews (what people love and hate)

Identify key flows to analyze:

• Onboarding / Sign-up
• Core feature experience
• Pricing / Conversion
• Mobile experience

Phase 2: Live Analysis

Navigation strategy:

1. Start at homepage
2. Follow the primary user journey
3. Screenshot every meaningful screen (use full page capture)
4. Note micro-interactions and feedback
5. Test on multiple viewports (375px mobile, 1440px desktop)

What to capture:

• First impressions (homepage)
• Sign-up / Onboarding flow
• Core feature experience
• Empty states and error handling
• Help / Support access
• Pricing presentation

Phase 3: Professional Evaluation

JTBD Analysis

When [situation], users want to [motivation], so they can [outcome].

Nielsen's Heuristics (Score 0-4)

#	Heuristic	Questions
1	Visibility	Do users know what is happening?
2	Real world match	Is language familiar?
3	User control	Can users undo/cancel?
4	Consistency	Are patterns repeated?
5	Error prevention	Are mistakes prevented?
6	Recognition	Are options visible?
7	Flexibility	Are there shortcuts?
8	Minimalism	Is it clutter-free?
9	Error recovery	Are error messages helpful?
10	Help	Is guidance available?

Competitive Dimensions (Rate 1-5)

• Simplicity -- How easy to use?
• Speed -- How fast to complete tasks?
• Clarity -- How clear is the UI?
• Delight -- Any wow moments?
• Trust -- Does it feel reliable?

Phase 4: Insights Extraction

What They Do WELL (Copy/Adapt)

• Patterns that reduce friction
• Clever interactions
• Effective copywriting
• Trust-building elements

What They Do POORLY (Avoid/Improve)

• Friction points
• Confusing flows
• Missing features
• Bad patterns

Opportunities for Us

• Gaps in their offering
• Features they lack
• Better approaches possible
• Differentiation opportunities

Report Structure

# Competitor Analysis: [Name]

**URL:** [https://...]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]

## Executive Summary
## Company Overview (target audience, value proposition, pricing)
## JTBD Analysis
## Flow Analysis (homepage, onboarding, core feature, mobile)
## Heuristic Evaluation (score table, total out of 40)
## Competitive Scorecard (simplicity, speed, clarity, delight, trust)
## Key Insights (what they do well, what they do poorly, opportunities)
## Recommendations for Our Product (immediate actions, consider later)
## Screenshots Gallery

Report Output

Save to: .claude/reports/competitor-[name]-[YYYYMMDD].md

Reference Files

Load these on demand for extended guidance:

File	Purpose
references/nielsen-heuristics.md	Detailed heuristic evaluation guide
references/competitive-scorecard.md	Scoring methodology

Quality Gates

• Screenshots must use full page capture
• Both mobile (375px) and desktop (1440px) viewports must be tested
• Every heuristic must be scored with evidence
• Report must include actionable recommendations for your own product
• Insights must be categorized as learn-from, avoid, or opportunity
• Report must be saved as a file