agentsclimarketplace

Improve architecture

Skill OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin/skills/improve-architecture

Surface deepening refactors that turn shallow modules into deep ones, raising testability and agent-navigability.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin --skill improve-architecture

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

5.2 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Iteration loop: explore for friction, present deepening candidates, grill the chosen one, update domain artifacts inline. Vocabulary is load-bearing. See references/LANGUAGE.md.

Vocabulary [LOAD-BEARING]

Use these terms exactly. Do not substitute "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Full definitions in references/LANGUAGE.md.

  • Module: anything with an interface and an implementation (function, class, package, slice). Scale-agnostic.
  • Interface: every fact a caller must know: types, invariants, ordering, error modes, config, performance shape. Not just signature.
  • Depth: leverage at the interface. Deep = much behaviour behind a small interface. Shallow = interface as complex as implementation.
  • Seam (Feathers): where an interface lives; a place behaviour can be altered without editing in place. Use this, not "boundary."
  • Adapter: a concrete thing satisfying an interface at a seam. Role, not substance.
  • Leverage: capability callers gain per unit of interface learned.
  • Locality: concentration of change, bug, and knowledge at one site for maintainers.

Principles

  • Deletion test: imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
  • Interface = test surface. Tests cross the same seam callers cross. Wanting to test past the interface = wrong shape.
  • One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam. No port without two real implementations (production + test).

Process

1. Explore

First tool call MUST be Explore-agent dispatch, not direct reads. The agent's brief:

  • Read CONTEXT.md (or CONTEXT-MAP.md + per-context CONTEXT.md) and any docs/adr/. If absent, proceed silently.
  • Walk the codebase organically; classify friction:
    • Concept understanding requires bouncing across many small modules → shallow cluster.
    • Interface complexity matches implementation complexity → shallow module.
    • Pure functions extracted only for testability while real bugs hide in callers → no locality.
    • Tightly coupled modules leaking across their seams.
  • For each suspect, run the deletion test before reporting.

2. Present candidates

Numbered list. Each candidate: Files, Problem (concrete friction; cite deletion test), Solution (plain-English description; no interface yet), Benefits (locality, leverage, testability deltas).

ADR conflicts: surface only when friction warrants reopening; mark explicitly: "contradicts ADR-0007: worth reopening because…".

Ask: "Which candidate to explore?" Do not propose interfaces yet.

3. Grilling loop

Once user picks, drop into adversarial interview. Walk the design tree, resolve dependencies one decision at a time, recommend an answer per question. Side effects happen inline:

  • New domain term emerging? Update CONTEXT.md immediately (lazy create).
  • User rejects with a load-bearing reason that future explorers would need? Offer ADR.
  • User wants alternative interfaces for the chosen candidate? Pivot to references/INTERFACE-DESIGN.md for parallel sub-agent design twice (Ousterhout).

Deepening categories (testing strategy per dependency class)

Full treatment in references/DEEPENING.md. Summary:

ClassDeepenable?Test strategy
In-process (pure / in-memory)AlwaysMerge modules; test through new interface directly. No adapter.
Local-substitutable (PGLite, in-memory FS)Yes if stand-in existsStand-in runs in tests; seam stays internal.
Remote but owned (microservices)Yes via Ports & AdaptersPort at seam; HTTP/gRPC adapter prod, in-memory adapter test.
True external (Stripe, Twilio)YesInjected port; mock adapter for tests.

Replace, don't layer: delete shallow-module tests once interface tests exist.

Language-neutral examples

Rust: shallow validate_address + format_address + geocode_address separately called by a Shipment aggregator. Deletion test: removing format_address concentrates string-handling at one call site → was a pass-through. Deepen into address::Resolver with resolve(raw) -> Result<Resolved, AddressError>; tests cross the new interface; in-memory Geocoder adapter for tests, HTTP adapter for production.

Python: module exposes parse_invoice, apply_tax, round_total as separate top-level functions; every caller chains all three. Deepen into billing.Invoice.finalize(raw) -> Invoice. Internal seams (tax tables, rounding rules) stay private; the test surface is Invoice.finalize.

Reference docs

  • references/LANGUAGE.md: full vocabulary, principles, rejected framings.
  • references/DEEPENING.md: dependency taxonomy, seam discipline, replace-don't-layer testing.
  • references/INTERFACE-DESIGN.md: parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" workflow when the chosen candidate's interface needs alternatives.

Forbidden: proposing interfaces in step 2 (premature commitment), bundling unrelated refactors, re-litigating ADRs without a load-bearing reason.

What ships with it: 2 files

6.6 KB alongside SKILL.md

references/

Gives 1 of the 12 instructions most architecture codebase skills give in ~1.1k tokens

Counted across 811 of the 1,134 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Ask the user which candidate to explorehere, and in 45 of 811, across 15 files
  • Apply the deletion test to suspected shallow modulesin 43 of 811, across 15 files
  • Read any relevant architecture decision records firstin 31 of 811, across 8 files
  • Use exact glossary terms in every suggestionin 30 of 811, across 10 files
  • Accept dependencies instead of creating themin 24 of 811, across 5 files
  • Include before and after visualisations for each candidatein 24 of 811, across 5 files
  • Read the domain glossary before exploringin 24 of 811, across 6 files
  • Return results instead of producing side effectsin 23 of 811, across 4 files
  • Explore the codebase for shallow modules and frictionin 23 of 811, across 3 files
  • Introduce seams only where things varyin 22 of 811, across 3 files
  • Reduce the number of methodsin 21 of 811, across 2 files
  • Design deep modules with small interfacesin 21 of 811, across 3 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • use the load-bearing vocabulary exactly
  • run the deletion test on suspects
  • propose plain-English solutions without interfaces
  • grill the chosen candidate adversarially
  • recommend one answer per design question
  • replace shallow-module tests with interface tests

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,970. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.