agentsclimarketplace

Content writer

Skill Orkas-AI/Orkas-Awesome-AgentSkills/creation/skills/content-writer

Curated Orkas agents and skills for education, product development, content creation, data analysis, office automation, and e-commerce workflows.

Install
npx -y skills add Orkas-AI/Orkas-Awesome-AgentSkills --skill content-writer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 12 stars12 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Content Writer

When to Use

Use this skill when the user wants to write, improve, or audit long-form content.

Use for:

  • writing articles, blogs, newsletters, tutorials, case studies, explainers, or opinion pieces.
  • building outlines, hooks, section plans, titles, conclusions, and citation lists.
  • improving an existing draft while preserving the author's voice.
  • making text more natural and less AI-like.
  • checking facts, statistics, citations, links, and company/product claims before publishing.

Do not use this skill for platform-native social posts, social calendars, browser-based draft publishing, or final professional legal/medical/financial advice.

Choose The Mode

Pick one mode from the user's request. If the request spans multiple modes, handle them in order and say which mode is active.

ModeUse whenOutput
planuser needs topic clarification, angle, outline, or research planthesis, reader, outline, evidence gaps
draftuser wants a first complete article or sectionfull draft with assumptions and source gaps
reviseuser has a draft and wants structure, clarity, or style editsedited version plus change notes
humanizeuser says it sounds AI-like, stiff, generic, or unnaturalnatural rewrite preserving meaning
audituser asks to verify facts, links, references, claims, or publish readinessaudit report with pass/issues

Workflow

  1. Clarify only what matters:
    • topic, target reader, publishing context, purpose, tone, length, and deadline.
    • available materials: notes, draft, links, files, citations, brand voice, product docs, or style samples.
    • whether the user wants speed, depth, or strict verification.
  2. For plan:
    • define thesis, reader promise, angle, hook options, section structure, and evidence needs.
    • mark weak claims and missing sources.
  3. For draft:
    • write from the outline or available source material.
    • use clear labels for assumptions, placeholders, and claims needing verification.
    • avoid inventing statistics, experts, sources, case studies, customer quotes, or publication dates.
  4. For revise:
    • improve clarity, logic, flow, evidence, section order, rhythm, and conclusion.
    • preserve the user's intended meaning and voice.
    • give optional alternatives when tone is subjective.
  5. For humanize:
    • remove inflated significance, promotional phrasing, vague attribution, generic transitions, forced groups of three, excessive synonym cycling, and uniform sentence rhythm.
    • prefer concrete verbs, specific nouns, natural uncertainty, and human pacing.
    • do not make unsupported claims more confident.
  6. For audit:
    • extract URLs, statistics, research citations, company claims, source attributions, and competitor claims.
    • verify links and exact claim support when tools/web access are available.
    • label findings: PASS, BROKEN, FETCH_FAILED, ACCESS_BLOCKED, MISMATCH, UNSOURCED, UNVERIFIABLE, or UNVERIFIABLE_COMPANY_CLAIM.
  7. Finish with the most useful next action:
    • draft, revised text, checklist, verification gaps, or recommended publication hold.

Return Formats

For planning:

# Content Plan

## Thesis
- ...

## Reader
- ...

## Hook Options
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

## Outline
### 1. [section]
- Point:
- Evidence needed:
- Example:

## Source Gaps
- ...

For revision or humanizing:

## Rewritten Version
...

## What Changed
- ...

## Still Needs Verification
- ...

For audit:

# Content Audit

## Summary
| Category | Total | Pass | Issues |
|---|---:|---:|---:|

## Must Fix Before Publishing
| Claim | Status | Issue | Suggested Fix |
|---|---|---|---|

## Warnings
- ...

## Passed / Limited
- ...

Dependencies

  • Web access is required for current research, source verification, and live URL checks.
  • User-provided drafts, source files, brand claims, product docs, and style samples take priority over generic assumptions.
  • Some sources may require login or manual access; mark them as access-limited.

Limits

  • Do not fabricate facts, data, citations, links, quotes, customer stories, or personal experience.
  • Do not guarantee that text passes AI detection.
  • Do not remove required disclosures, citations, compliance language, or safety warnings.
  • Do not publish or operate external platforms.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.