Senior data engineer
Skill OpenSIN-AI/OpenSIN-Skills/engineering-team/senior-data-engineer
Data engineering skill for building scalable data pipelines, ETL/ELT systems, and data infrastructure. Expertise in Python, SQL, Spark, Airflow, dbt, Kafka, and modern data stack. Includes data modeling, pipeline orchestration, data quality, and DataOps. Use when designing data architectures, building data pipelines, optimizing data workflows, implementing data governance, or troubleshooting data issues.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add OpenSIN-AI/OpenSIN-Skills --skill senior-data-engineerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.9 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Senior Data Engineer
Production-grade data engineering skill for building scalable, reliable data systems.
Table of Contents
- Trigger Phrases
- Quick Start
- Workflows
- Architecture Decision Framework
- Tech Stack
- Reference Documentation
- Troubleshooting
Trigger Phrases
Activate this skill when you see:
Pipeline Design:
- "Design a data pipeline for..."
- "Build an ETL/ELT process..."
- "How should I ingest data from..."
- "Set up data extraction from..."
Architecture:
- "Should I use batch or streaming?"
- "Lambda vs Kappa architecture"
- "How to handle late-arriving data"
- "Design a data lakehouse"
Data Modeling:
- "Create a dimensional model..."
- "Star schema vs snowflake"
- "Implement slowly changing dimensions"
- "Design a data vault"
Data Quality:
- "Add data validation to..."
- "Set up data quality checks"
- "Monitor data freshness"
- "Implement data contracts"
Performance:
- "Optimize this Spark job"
- "Query is running slow"
- "Reduce pipeline execution time"
- "Tune Airflow DAG"
Quick Start
Core Tools
# Generate pipeline orchestration config
python scripts/pipeline_orchestrator.py generate \
--type airflow \
--source postgres \
--destination snowflake \
--schedule "0 5 * * *"
# Validate data quality
python scripts/data_quality_validator.py validate \
--input data/sales.parquet \
--schema schemas/sales.json \
--checks freshness,completeness,uniqueness
# Optimize ETL performance
python scripts/etl_performance_optimizer.py analyze \
--query queries/daily_aggregation.sql \
--engine spark \
--recommend
Workflows
→ See references/workflows.md for details
Architecture Decision Framework
Use this framework to choose the right approach for your data pipeline.
Batch vs Streaming
| Criteria | Batch | Streaming |
|---|---|---|
| Latency requirement | Hours to days | Seconds to minutes |
| Data volume | Large historical datasets | Continuous event streams |
| Processing complexity | Complex transformations, ML | Simple aggregations, filtering |
| Cost sensitivity | More cost-effective | Higher infrastructure cost |
| Error handling | Easier to reprocess | Requires careful design |
Decision Tree:
Is real-time insight required?
├── Yes → Use streaming
│ └── Is exactly-once semantics needed?
│ ├── Yes → Kafka + Flink/Spark Structured Streaming
│ └── No → Kafka + consumer groups
└── No → Use batch
└── Is data volume > 1TB daily?
├── Yes → Spark/Databricks
└── No → dbt + warehouse compute
Lambda vs Kappa Architecture
| Aspect | Lambda | Kappa |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | Two codebases (batch + stream) | Single codebase |
| Maintenance | Higher (sync batch/stream logic) | Lower |
| Reprocessing | Native batch layer | Replay from source |
| Use case | ML training + real-time serving | Pure event-driven |
When to choose Lambda:
- Need to train ML models on historical data
- Complex batch transformations not feasible in streaming
- Existing batch infrastructure
When to choose Kappa:
- Event-sourced architecture
- All processing can be expressed as stream operations
- Starting fresh without legacy systems
Data Warehouse vs Data Lakehouse
| Feature | Warehouse (Snowflake/BigQuery) | Lakehouse (Delta/Iceberg) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | BI, SQL analytics | ML, unstructured data |
| Storage cost | Higher (proprietary format) | Lower (open formats) |
| Flexibility | Schema-on-write | Schema-on-read |
| Performance | Excellent for SQL | Good, improving |
| Ecosystem | Mature BI tools | Growing ML tooling |
Tech Stack
| Category | Technologies |
|---|---|
| Languages | Python, SQL, Scala |
| Orchestration | Airflow, Prefect, Dagster |
| Transformation | dbt, Spark, Flink |
| Streaming | Kafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub |
| Storage | S3, GCS, Delta Lake, Iceberg |
| Warehouses | Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks |
| Quality | Great Expectations, dbt tests, Monte Carlo |
| Monitoring | Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog |
Reference Documentation
1. Data Pipeline Architecture
See references/data_pipeline_architecture.md for:
- Lambda vs Kappa architecture patterns
- Batch processing with Spark and Airflow
- Stream processing with Kafka and Flink
- Exactly-once semantics implementation
- Error handling and dead letter queues
2. Data Modeling Patterns
See references/data_modeling_patterns.md for:
- Dimensional modeling (Star/Snowflake)
- Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCD Types 1-6)
- Data Vault modeling
- dbt best practices
- Partitioning and clustering
3. DataOps Best Practices
See references/dataops_best_practices.md for:
- Data testing frameworks
- Data contracts and schema validation
- CI/CD for data pipelines
- Observability and lineage
- Incident response
Troubleshooting
→ See references/troubleshooting.md for details
What ships with it: 8 files
272.5 KB alongside SKILL.md, 3 of them executable
references/
- data_modeling_patterns.md26.1 KB
- dataops_best_practices.md42.4 KB
- data_pipeline_architecture.md33.8 KB
- troubleshooting.md3.2 KB
- workflows.md15.1 KB
scripts/
- data_quality_validator.pyruns59.2 KB
- etl_performance_optimizer.pyruns64.5 KB
- pipeline_orchestrator.pyruns28.1 KB
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most data pipelines skills give in ~1.3k tokens
Counted across 149 of the 156 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Run a safe catch-up or sample benchmarkin 13 of 149, across 4 files
- Rerun final accounting after the codified path executesin 13 of 149, across 4 files
- Move compute to where the data already isin 13 of 149, across 4 files
- Batch small files, requests, and writesin 13 of 149, across 4 files
- Use manifests or checkpoints to skip completed filesin 13 of 149, across 4 files
- Measure backlog across files, rows, and timestampsin 13 of 149, across 4 files
- Codify the path as a CLI or scheduled jobin 12 of 149, across 3 files
- Promote only the fastest correctness-preserving pathin 10 of 149, across 3 files
- Separate the bottleneck categories before optimizingin 10 of 149, across 3 files
- Prefer warehouse-native scans, joins, and appendsin 9 of 149, across 2 files
- Make writes idempotent through keys, manifests, or replaceable stagingin 9 of 149, across 2 files
- Retry failures with exponential backoffin 9 of 149, across 7 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Validate data quality for freshness, completeness, and uniqueness
- Analyze ETL queries and recommend performance optimizations
- Use streaming when real-time insight is required
- Use batch when real-time insight is not required
- Use Kafka with Flink for exactly-once semantics
- Use Spark for volumes above one terabyte daily
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.