Performance profiler
Skill OpenSIN-AI/OpenSIN-Skills/engineering/performance-profiler
The world's largest open-source AI agent skill library — 280+ skills across 9 knowledge domains + 46 operational actions. Built on alirezarezvani/claude-skills + OpenSIN-AI.
npx -y skills add OpenSIN-AI/OpenSIN-Skills --skill performance-profilerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Performance Profiler
SKILL.md
5.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Performance Profiler
Tier: POWERFUL
Category: Engineering
Domain: Performance Engineering
Overview
Systematic performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications. Identifies CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks; generates flamegraphs; analyzes bundle sizes; optimizes database queries; detects memory leaks; and runs load tests with k6 and Artillery. Always measures before and after.
Core Capabilities
- CPU profiling — flamegraphs for Node.js, py-spy for Python, pprof for Go
- Memory profiling — heap snapshots, leak detection, GC pressure
- Bundle analysis — webpack-bundle-analyzer, Next.js bundle analyzer
- Database optimization — EXPLAIN ANALYZE, slow query log, N+1 detection
- Load testing — k6 scripts, Artillery scenarios, ramp-up patterns
- Before/after measurement — establish baseline, profile, optimize, verify
When to Use
- App is slow and you don't know where the bottleneck is
- P99 latency exceeds SLA before a release
- Memory usage grows over time (suspected leak)
- Bundle size increased after adding dependencies
- Preparing for a traffic spike (load test before launch)
- Database queries taking >100ms
Quick Start
# Analyze a project for performance risk indicators
python3 scripts/performance_profiler.py /path/to/project
# JSON output for CI integration
python3 scripts/performance_profiler.py /path/to/project --json
# Custom large-file threshold
python3 scripts/performance_profiler.py /path/to/project --large-file-threshold-kb 256
Golden Rule: Measure First
# Establish baseline BEFORE any optimization
# Record: P50, P95, P99 latency | RPS | error rate | memory usage
# Wrong: "I think the N+1 query is slow, let me fix it"
# Right: Profile → confirm bottleneck → fix → measure again → verify improvement
Node.js Profiling
→ See references/profiling-recipes.md for details
Before/After Measurement Template
## Performance Optimization: [What You Fixed]
**Date:** 2026-03-01
**Engineer:** @username
**Ticket:** PROJ-123
### Problem
[1-2 sentences: what was slow, how was it observed]
### Root Cause
[What the profiler revealed]
### Baseline (Before)
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| P50 latency | 480ms |
| P95 latency | 1,240ms |
| P99 latency | 3,100ms |
| RPS @ 50 VUs | 42 |
| Error rate | 0.8% |
| DB queries/req | 23 (N+1) |
Profiler evidence: [link to flamegraph or screenshot]
### Fix Applied
[What changed — code diff or description]
### After
| Metric | Before | After | Delta |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|
| P50 latency | 480ms | 48ms | -90% |
| P95 latency | 1,240ms | 120ms | -90% |
| P99 latency | 3,100ms | 280ms | -91% |
| RPS @ 50 VUs | 42 | 380 | +804% |
| Error rate | 0.8% | 0% | -100% |
| DB queries/req | 23 | 1 | -96% |
### Verification
Load test run: [link to k6 output]
Optimization Checklist
Quick wins (check these first)
Database
□ Missing indexes on WHERE/ORDER BY columns
□ N+1 queries (check query count per request)
□ Loading all columns when only 2-3 needed (SELECT *)
□ No LIMIT on unbounded queries
□ Missing connection pool (creating new connection per request)
Node.js
□ Sync I/O (fs.readFileSync) in hot path
□ JSON.parse/stringify of large objects in hot loop
□ Missing caching for expensive computations
□ No compression (gzip/brotli) on responses
□ Dependencies loaded in request handler (move to module level)
Bundle
□ Moment.js → dayjs/date-fns
□ Lodash (full) → lodash/function imports
□ Static imports of heavy components → dynamic imports
□ Images not optimized / not using next/image
□ No code splitting on routes
API
□ No pagination on list endpoints
□ No response caching (Cache-Control headers)
□ Serial awaits that could be parallel (Promise.all)
□ Fetching related data in a loop instead of JOIN
Common Pitfalls
- Optimizing without measuring — you'll optimize the wrong thing
- Testing in development — profile against production-like data volumes
- Ignoring P99 — P50 can look fine while P99 is catastrophic
- Premature optimization — fix correctness first, then performance
- Not re-measuring — always verify the fix actually improved things
- Load testing production — use staging with production-size data
Best Practices
- Baseline first, always — record metrics before touching anything
- One change at a time — isolate the variable to confirm causation
- Profile with realistic data — 10 rows in dev, millions in prod — different bottlenecks
- Set performance budgets —
p(95) < 200msin CI thresholds with k6 - Monitor continuously — add Datadog/Prometheus metrics for key paths
- Cache invalidation strategy — cache aggressively, invalidate precisely
- Document the win — before/after in the PR description motivates the team