Ml training recipes
Skill OpenRaiser/NanoResearch/skills/vendor-ai-research/ml-training-recipes
π¦+π¬ NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant
npx -y skills add OpenRaiser/NanoResearch --skill ml-training-recipesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains β LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning neural networks, debugging loss spikes or OOM, choosing architectures, or optimizing GPU throughput.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the authorβs claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
11.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
ML Training Recipes
Battle-tested patterns for PyTorch training across domains. Drawn from production codebases (Karpathy's autoresearch/nanochat, torchvision, HuggingFace) and modern training practice.
Reference files (read when needed)
references/architecture.mdβ Transformer/LLM architecture code patterns, weight initreferences/optimizers.mdβ Muon, AdamW hybrid, per-group LR, compiled optimizer stepsreferences/domain-specific.mdβ Vision, diffusion, contrastive, distributed, checkpointing, data loadingreferences/scaling-and-selection.mdβ Scaling laws, compute budget tables, decision trees, DGX Sparkreferences/biomedical.mdβ Drug discovery, protein models, medical imaging, genomics, clinical NLPreferences/experiment-loop.mdβ Autonomous experiment loop (autoresearch keep/discard/revert)
Architecture Selection
Pick the right model by data type and data scale:
| Data Type | < 10K samples | 10K-100K | > 100K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Images | Pretrained CNN + fine-tune | Fine-tune ViT or CNN | ViT from scratch |
| Text (gen) | Few-shot prompting | Fine-tune GPT/LLaMA (LoRA) | Pretrain from scratch |
| Tabular | XGBoost/LightGBM | Still XGBoost | Neural viable |
| Audio | Pretrained Whisper | Fine-tune AST | Train from scratch |
| Molecules | Pretrained GNN | Fine-tune molecular LM | Train GNN from scratch |
| Proteins | ESM-2 embeddings + head | Fine-tune ESM-2 | Train protein LM |
| Medical img | Pretrained CNN | nnU-Net (auto-config) | Swin-UNETR / MedSAM |
Key principle: architecture matters less than training recipe at equal compute. A well-tuned ResNet beats a poorly-tuned ViT (ref: "ResNet Strikes Back", Wightman 2021).
For biomedical domains, see references/biomedical.md.
For sequence model selection and compute planning, see references/scaling-and-selection.md.
Scaling Laws
Chinchilla rule (Hoffmann et al., 2022)
Compute-optimal training: ~20 tokens per parameter.
| Model Size | Compute-Optimal | Inference-Optimal (100Γ) |
|---|---|---|
| 125M | 2.5B tokens | 12.5B tokens |
| 1B | 20B tokens | 100B tokens |
| 7B | 140B tokens | 700B tokens |
FLOPs β 6 Γ N Γ D (N=params, D=tokens). Data repetition limit: ~4 epochs before diminishing returns.
Training Loop
import gc, time, torch
torch.manual_seed(42)
torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high") # TF32 on Ampere+
autocast_ctx = torch.amp.autocast(device_type="cuda", dtype=torch.bfloat16)
grad_accum_steps = total_batch_size // (batch_size * seq_len)
step = 0
while not done:
t0 = time.time()
for micro_step in range(grad_accum_steps):
with autocast_ctx:
loss = model(x, y)
(loss / grad_accum_steps).backward()
x, y = next(train_loader)
update_lr(optimizer, progress)
optimizer.step()
model.zero_grad(set_to_none=True) # frees memory vs zeroing
if loss.item() > 100: # fast-fail on divergence
print("FAIL: loss exploded"); exit(1)
torch.cuda.synchronize()
if step == 0:
gc.collect(); gc.freeze(); gc.disable() # avoid ~500ms GC stalls
step += 1
Key principles
- Gradient clipping:
clip_grad_norm_(params, 1.0)β near-universal for Transformers. Exception: Muon optimizer normalizes updates via orthogonalization, so clipping is optional. - Tensor Core alignment: batch size, hidden dims should be multiples of 8 (bf16) or 64 (A100).
- Time-based budgets make experiments comparable across hardware.
cudnn.benchmark = Truefor fixed-size vision inputs.
Optimizer Configuration
Modern LLM training uses different optimizers per parameter group:
| Parameter Type | Optimizer | LR (base) | Weight Decay |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2D weight matrices | Muon | 0.04 | 0.2 |
| Token embeddings | AdamW | 0.6 Γ scale | 0.0 |
| Unembedding (lm_head) | AdamW | 0.004 Γ scale | 0.0 |
| Per-layer scalars | AdamW | 0.005 Γ scale | 0.0 |
LR scaling by dimension: lr * (d_model / 768)^(-0.5) β keeps dynamics stable across sizes.
Rules of thumb
- Embeddings need higher LR (sparse updates). Never weight-decay embeddings.
- Weight decay scheduling: linearly decay WD to 0 over training.
- AdamW defaults: Ξ²1=0.9, Ξ²2=0.95, eps=1e-10 (not default 1e-8 β prevents stale updates in bf16).
For Muon details (polar express orthogonalization, NorMuon), see references/optimizers.md.
Learning Rate Scheduling
Time-based (autoresearch style)
def get_lr_multiplier(progress): # progress = elapsed_time / time_budget
if progress < warmup_ratio:
return progress / warmup_ratio
elif progress < 1.0 - warmdown_ratio:
return 1.0
else:
cooldown = (1.0 - progress) / warmdown_ratio
return cooldown + (1 - cooldown) * final_lr_frac
Cosine decay
def get_lr(step, total_steps, max_lr, min_lr, warmup_steps):
if step < warmup_steps:
return max_lr * step / warmup_steps
progress = (step - warmup_steps) / (total_steps - warmup_steps)
return min_lr + 0.5 * (max_lr - min_lr) * (1 + math.cos(math.pi * progress))
WSD (Warmup-Stable-Decay): gaining traction β easier to resume training mid-run.
Guidance
- Warmup: 1-5% of training. Zero warmup valid with Muon (autoresearch uses
WARMUP_RATIO=0.0). - Warmdown: 30-50% of training in LR decay. Matters more than warmup for final quality.
- Final LR: 0 or ~10% of peak. Zero is simpler.
Mixed Precision & Compilation
import os
os.environ["PYTORCH_ALLOC_CONF"] = "expandable_segments:True" # before torch import
import torch
torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high")
autocast_ctx = torch.amp.autocast(device_type="cuda", dtype=torch.bfloat16)
model = torch.compile(model, dynamic=False)
- bf16 (Ampere+): same exponent as fp32, no loss scaling needed. Preferred over fp16.
- fp16: needs GradScaler. Use only on V100 or older.
dynamic=Falseenables max optimization. Addfullgraph=Trueif no graph breaks.- First steps are slow (JIT) β exclude from timing.
Memory & Performance
Meta device init (large models)
with torch.device("meta"):
model = GPT(config) # zero memory
model.to_empty(device="cuda")
model.init_weights()
MFU (Model FLOPs Utilization)
achieved_flops = model_flops_per_token * batch_tokens / step_time
mfu = achieved_flops / gpu_peak_flops
# H100 SXM: 989.5 TFLOPS | A100: 312 | RTX 4090: 165
Good targets: >30% decent, >40% good, >50% excellent (single-GPU).
OOM solutions (in order)
- Reduce
DEVICE_BATCH_SIZE, increasegrad_accum_steps PYTORCH_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:Truemodel.zero_grad(set_to_none=True)- Meta device init β
to_empty - Activation checkpointing:
torch.utils.checkpoint.checkpoint() - 8-bit optimizer (bitsandbytes): ~30% savings on optimizer states
Hyperparameter Search
Priority order (tune first β last)
- Learning rate β most impactful. Always tune first.
- Batch size β largest that fits. Speed knob, not quality knob.
- Weight decay β 0.01-0.1 for AdamW.
- Warmup steps β 1-5% of training.
The 2025 default recipe
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Optimizer | AdamW (Ξ²1=0.9, Ξ²2=0.95, eps=1e-10) |
| Weight decay | 0.1 |
| LR schedule | Cosine decay or WSD |
| Peak LR | 3e-4 (scale down for larger models) |
| Precision | bf16 |
| Grad clipping | max_norm=1.0 |
| Normalization | RMSNorm (pre-norm) |
| Activation | SwiGLU |
| Position encoding | RoPE |
| Attention | Flash Attention, optionally GQA |
Debugging Checklist
Karpathy's recipe (still canonical)
- Become one with the data β visualize, check distributions, verify labels
- Get end-to-end running first β verify on a trivial case
- Overfit one batch β if you can't, you have a bug
- Then regularize β add regularization only after overfitting works
- Tune hyperparameters β start with known defaults
Loss exploding / NaN
- Reduce LR (3-10Γ smaller)
- Add gradient clipping:
clip_grad_norm_(params, 1.0) - Check for inf/nan in inputs
- Add logit soft capping:
softcap * tanh(logits / softcap) - Add QK-norm in attention
- Verify weight init (zero-init output projections?)
- Check loss reduction with gradient accumulation (
loss / grad_accum_steps)
Slow training / Low MFU
- Verify
torch.compileis active - Check
torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high") - Pin memory + non_blocking transfers
- Profile with
torch.profiler - GC stalls?
gc.freeze(); gc.disable() - Tensor Core alignment: dims multiples of 8/64
Loss plateau / Slow convergence
- LR too low β try 2-5Γ larger
- Warmup too long
- Weight decay too high
- Verify LR schedule is actually applied (print each step)
- Model too small for task
Silent failures
- Data leakage between train/val
- Wrong preprocessing at inference β augmentation mismatch
- Label errors β use cleanlab to detect
- Shuffling bugs β correlated batches
- Tokenizer mismatch with pretrained model
What to monitor
- Gradient norms β spike precedes loss spike
- Per-layer activation stats β reveals exploding/vanishing
- Dead neurons β >50% zero ReLU = dying ReLU problem
- Learning rate β verify schedule applied (common silent bug)
Experiment Management
Track experiments in TSV for easy comparison:
commit val_bpb memory_gb status description
a1b2c3d 0.9979 44.0 keep baseline
b2c3d4e 0.9932 44.2 keep increase matrix LR to 0.04
c3d4e5f 1.0050 44.0 discard switch to GeLU (worse)
Simplicity criterion: all else equal, simpler is better. Removing something and getting equal
results is a great outcome. For systematic agent-driven experimentation, see references/experiment-loop.md.
Evaluation metrics by domain
| Domain | Primary Metric | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| LLM | BPB (bits per byte) | Vocab-size-independent |
| Classification | Accuracy / F1 | Macro-F1 for imbalanced |
| Segmentation | mIoU / Dice | Per-class IoU reveals weak spots |
| Generation | FID | Needs >10k samples |
| Regression | RMSE / MAE | Log-transform skewed targets |