Governance
Skill openEHR/ai-plugins/plugins/openehr-specs/skills/governance
AI plugins for openEHR - specification authoring, review and governance skills. Claude Code marketplace.
npx -y skills add openEHR/ai-plugins --skill governanceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Manage the openEHR specification governance lifecycle — releases, change requests (CR/PR), and lifecycle states (DEVELOPMENT/TRIAL/STABLE…). This skill should be used when the user asks to create or tag a release, prepare a release branch, update the manifest for a release, submit or manage a CR/PR, promote a spec's status, or discuss the openEHR change process or Jira workflow. Not for clinical/archetype governance, amendment-record authoring (use amendment-record), or non-openEHR release management.
SKILL.md
6.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
openEHR Specification Governance
This skill covers the change process, release management, and lifecycle governance for openEHR specifications. It is based on the official governance documents at specifications.openehr.org/governance.
Related Skills
- authoring — document scaffolding, repo layout, boilerplate structure
- amendment-record — detailed amendment record authoring conventions
- review — pre-release quality review of spec documents
Specification Lifecycle States
Every specification follows a formal lifecycle:
Planning → Development → Trial → Stable
↓
Paused → Retired
| State | Duration | Format | Versioning | Change Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning | 6 months max | Wiki | 0.y.z | Informal |
| Development | 18 months max | Wiki | 0.y.z | Optional CRs |
| Trial | 2 years max | HTML + computable | x.y.z | Formal CRs |
| Stable | Unbounded | HTML + computable | x.y.z | Formal CRs |
| Paused | Unbounded | HTML + computable | paused | CRs only for state changes |
| Retired | Unbounded | Frozen version | n/a | None |
The Specifications Editorial Committee (SEC) reviews promotion criteria three months before target dates. Unmet criteria may trigger a single three-month extension; subsequent failure results in retirement.
The spec_status field in manifest.json and manifest_vars.adoc tracks this state.
Versioning
openEHR uses three-part semantic versioning (x.y.z):
- Patch (z): Error corrections and minor additions that do not change semantics
- Minor (y): Significant additions that do not change existing semantics
- Major (x): Semantic changes requiring potential software upgrades or data migration
Documentation-only corrections (typos, clarifications) receive a revision number update without triggering a new release number.
Artifact Types
Problem Reports (PRs)
- Raised by anyone on the public
SPECPRJira tracker - Document issues, bugs, or requirements against existing specifications
- The SEC reviews PRs every three months
- Reference format in specs:
{spec_tickets}/SPECPR-NNN[SPECPR-NNN^]
Change Requests (CRs)
- Created only by SEC members on component-specific Jira trackers (e.g.,
SPECRM,SPECAM) - Each CR documents a specific modification to one or more specifications
- CRs reference the PRs they address
- Reference format in specs:
{spec_tickets}/SPECRM-NNN[SPECRM-NNN^]
Change Request Lifecycle
1. Creation
A CR requires: title, description, problem statement or PR references, affected component(s).
2. Acceptance
The SEC determines if the CR addresses real needs. Accepted CRs receive:
- Completion target date
- Work estimate (days)
- Assigned Change Owner (the component maintainer or designee)
- Priority: minor, major, or critical
3. Work Execution
Minor changes (single-document, no semantic impact):
- Edit directly on the working branch
- Generate publication formats for review
Major changes (cross-cutting or semantic):
- Create a development branch
- Track progress on a dedicated wiki page
- 30-day open community review period required before approval
4. Approval
Minor changes:
- Component Maintainer reviews
- Pass → commit to specification library
- Fail → one week to revise (max 3 rounds, then rejected)
Major changes:
- 30-day community review on Discourse specifications forum
- Assignee revises within two weeks based on feedback
- Two-thirds SEC majority vote required
- Max 3 review rounds, then rejected
5. Community Requirement
From Release 1.0 onward, specification changes (excluding documentation-only text updates) must be announced on the Discourse specifications forum, and require implementation in at least one formal software, schema, or technical expression before adoption.
Release Process
Releases organize changes by component. The SEC defines release identifiers and delivery dates, allocating CRs to releases.
Release Naming
- Releases:
Release-N.N.N(e.g.,Release-1.0.4) - Fix releases:
Release-N.N.NvN(e.g.,Release-1.0.4v1) — for post-release corrections
Steps to Create a Release
Read references/release-checklist.md for the full step-by-step checklist.
The high-level process:
- Jira: Close all CRs and PRs for this release. Create saved searches for the release versions.
- manifest.json: Set the release date, verify
spec_statusfor each spec, ensure Jira links are correct. - Git: Create a release branch (
Release-N.N.N), publish with-l Release-N.N.N, commit, tag (annotated), push. - Webhook: The push triggers the specifications.openehr.org server to pull and deploy.
Steps to Fix a Release
- Check out the release branch
- Make corrections to source files
- Republish with the original release label
- Commit and add a new annotated tag:
Release-N.N.NvN+1 - Push (webhook overwrites the deployed release)
- Merge fixes back into
master
Creating a New Specification
New specifications are proposed via PR or CR. The SEC verifies:
- Identifier assignment (the
idfield) - Structural placement within the specification library
- Scope consistency with existing specifications
- Component location
Required Structure
All specifications must include:
- Front matter: identifier, version, amendments, copyright
- Introduction: purpose, related documents, status, tools, change history
- Main content
- References
- Internationalization considerations (where relevant)
Entry Paths
- Mature external offering: SEC assesses maturity; may start at Trial or Stable
- New development: Starts at Planning state with 0.y.z versioning
Roles
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| SEC (Specifications Editorial Committee) | Reviews all changes, accepts/rejects CRs, manages release allocation, promotes specs |
| Component Maintainer | Supervises component specs, assigns Change Owners, approves minor changes |
| Change Owner | Develops impact assessments, executes work, revises based on feedback |
| Community | Raises PRs, participates in open reviews on Discourse |