Revenue concentration
44 open-source financial skills for AI agents — P&L, budgeting, tax prep, debt payoff, and more. Works with Claude Code, Wilson, Cursor, Codex, and Paperclip.
npx -y skills add openaccountant/skills --skill revenue-concentrationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Assess client concentration risk using revenue share and Herfindahl index.
SKILL.md
3.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Revenue Concentration Risk
Overview
Measure how dependent your business is on a small number of clients. Calculates each client's revenue share, computes the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), and flags dangerous concentration levels.
Wilson Tools Used
transaction_search— find all revenue transactions and group by client or source to calculate per-client totals
Workflow
- Ask for the analysis period (recommend 12 months for accuracy).
- Use
transaction_searchto find all incoming payments (positive amounts). - Group by vendor/payee name to get per-client revenue totals.
- Calculate each client's revenue share as a percentage of total.
- Compute the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: HHI = sum of (each client's market share percentage squared).
- Generate the report:
REVENUE CONCENTRATION — [Period]
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Client Revenue Share Cumulative
───────────────────────────────────────────────────
Acme Corp $48,000 40.0% 40.0%
Beta LLC $30,000 25.0% 65.0%
Gamma Inc $18,000 15.0% 80.0%
Delta Co $12,000 10.0% 90.0%
Other (3 clients) $12,000 10.0% 100.0%
───────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total Revenue $120,000 100.0%
Herfindahl Index (HHI): 2,550
Concentration Level: HIGH
Top Client Dependency: 40.0%
Risk Assessment:
- Losing Acme Corp would eliminate 40% of revenue
- Top 2 clients = 65% of revenue
- Top 3 clients = 80% of revenue
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
- Interpret HHI:
- Under 1,500: Low concentration (diversified)
- 1,500-2,500: Moderate concentration
- Over 2,500: High concentration (risky)
- Flag any single client above 25% as a key-person risk.
- Recommend target: no single client above 20%, top 3 clients below 50%.
Without Wilson
- Export bank transactions as CSV for the past 12 months.
- Filter to income only (positive amounts in most bank exports).
- Add a "Client" column and tag each deposit with the source client.
- Pivot table: Rows = Client, Values = Sum of Amount. Sort descending.
- Revenue Share:
=ClientRevenue/TotalRevenue*100. - HHI: In a new column, square each share:
=Share^2. Then=SUM(SquaredShares). - For cumulative share, use
=SUM($B$2:B2)/TotalRevenue*100(assuming column B is revenue, sorted descending). - The U.S. DOJ uses HHI for antitrust analysis with the same thresholds: under 1,500 = unconcentrated, 1,500-2,500 = moderate, over 2,500 = highly concentrated. The same logic applies to your revenue risk.
Important Notes
- A perfectly equal distribution across 4 clients gives an HHI of 2,500 (still moderate). You need 7+ roughly equal clients to reach "low concentration."
- Revenue concentration is not inherently bad if the top clients are contractually committed (annual contracts, retainers). The risk is losing a major client with no notice.
- Track this quarterly. If a single client's share is growing, actively invest in diversifying your revenue base.
- Consider both revenue concentration and profit concentration. A client generating 40% of revenue but 60% of profit is an even bigger risk.