Deep research

Skill onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/skills/deep-research

Router-first AI skill system for Codex, Claude, Cursor, Hermes, Paperclip, OpenCode, and local AI stacks: search, preflight-route, and load 1,812 skills on demand without duplicating the corpus.

Install

npx -y skills add onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library --skill deep-research

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

13 stars13 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Multi-source deep research with evidence grading and contradiction detection. Use for any question requiring thorough investigation, competitive analysis, technology evaluation, or fact-finding across multiple sources. Triggers on: 'research this', 'deep dive into', 'investigate', 'what does the evidence say', 'compare options', 'find out about', 'analyze the landscape'.

SKILL.md

1.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Deep Research

Thinking Protocol

Before starting, answer silently:

What is the actual question? (Restate precisely — don't drift)
What would constitute a strong vs weak answer?
What are my known unknowns?

Execution

Phase 1: Decompose

Break into 3-7 precise sub-questions. For each, state what evidence type would answer it.

Phase 2: Multi-Source Search

Per sub-question, search minimum 3 independent sources. Prefer:

Primary over secondary sources
Recent over dated (flag anything >2 years old)
Peer-reviewed/official over blog posts
Contradicting sources are MORE valuable — seek them out

Phase 3: Evidence Grading

Every claim gets a confidence tier:

HIGH — Multiple independent sources agree, empirical evidence
MEDIUM — Single credible source, or sources with caveats
LOW — Anecdotal, single blog post, or inference
CONTESTED — Sources directly contradict (present both sides)

Phase 4: Synthesize

## [Topic]: Key Findings

### [Sub-question 1]
[Finding] — Confidence: [tier]
Evidence: [citations]

### Contradictions & Open Questions
[Where sources disagree, what remains unknown]

### Implications
[What this means for the user's actual goal]

Rules

🚨 Never present inference as fact. If reasoning beyond evidence, say so. 🚨 If confirming expectations, stop and search for disconfirming evidence. 🚨 State what you DON'T know with the same confidence you state what you do.