Phx triage
Skill oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/targets/pi/skills/phx-triage
Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 20 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute with automatic verification, review with 4-agent parallel audits, and capture learnings as reusable knowledge.
npx -y skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-triageAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Triage review findings interactively — approve, skip, or prioritize each issue. Use after /skill:phx-review to filter findings before fixing.
SKILL.md
3.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Triage — Interactive Review Resolution
Walk through review findings one by one for human decision before committing to fixes.
Usage
/skill:phx-triage .claude/plans/user-auth/reviews/user-auth-review.md
/skill:phx-triage # Uses most recent review
Why Triage
After /skill:phx-review produces findings, you have three options:
- Fix everything —
/skill:phx-plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/... - Triage first —
/skill:phx-triage(filter, then fix what matters) - Handle manually — Read review, pick what to fix yourself
Best when review has 5+ findings and you want to prioritize.
Workflow
Step 1: Load Review
Read the review file. Parse all findings with severity.
Auto-approve Iron Law violations: Findings matching any Iron Law are auto-approved as "Fix it" without asking. These are non-negotiable in Elixir/Phoenix development.
Step 2: Present ALL Findings for Batch Selection
Use AskUserQuestion with multiSelect: true. Start with
severity shortcuts, then list individual findings:
AskUserQuestion:
question: "Which findings do you want to fix? (Iron Law violations auto-included)"
header: "Triage"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "All BLOCKERs ({count})"
description: "Fix all critical issues"
- label: "All WARNINGs ({count})"
description: "Fix all should-fix issues"
- label: "[BLOCKER] {title 1}"
description: "{file}:{line} — {brief description}"
- label: "[WARNING] {title 2}"
description: "{file}:{line} — {brief description}"
If >4 options, batch into groups of 4 with severity shortcuts in the first batch. Severity shortcuts select all findings of that level — user can mix shortcuts with individual picks.
AskUserQuestion discipline: decisions only — never use it to
narrate progress. Every option carries {file}:{line} + counts so
the user decides without opening the review file.
Step 3: Gather Context on Selected Items
For selected items, ask ONE batch follow-up: "Any specific approach for any of these?" If they say "just fix them", proceed.
Step 4: Generate Triage Summary
Write to .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{slug}-triage.md with Fix Queue
(approved items with checkboxes), Skipped, and Deferred sections.
Step 5: Present Next Steps
Triage complete: {n} to fix, {n} skipped, {n} deferred.
1. Plan fixes — /skill:phx-plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{slug}-triage.md
2. Fix directly — /skill:phx-work (for simple fixes)
3. Review deferred items later
4. Capture solutions — /skill:phx-compound (if patterns were solved)
Iron Laws
- Batch selection over one-by-one — Use multiSelect for efficiency
- User decides, not the agent — Present facts, don't push
- BLOCKERs cannot be skipped silently — Warn if user tries
- Capture user context — Every "fix it" should include any user guidance for better fixes
- Suggest compound after triage — If triage reveals solved patterns
(root cause identified, fix known), mention
/skill:phx-compound - NEVER auto-decide severity or auto-dismiss findings — the human assigns final priority; present the agent's severity as a recommendation, not a verdict
Integration with Workflow
/skill:phx-review
|
/skill:phx-triage ← YOU ARE HERE (interactive filtering)
|
/skill:phx-plan (with triage file) → /skill:phx-work → /skill:phx-compound
References
references/triage-patterns.md— Common triage decisions