Flaky ci forensics

Flaky CI Forensics

Overview

Use this skill to convert noisy CI failures into a defensible flaky-test triage report. The goal is not to make tests pass by repeatedly rerunning them; the goal is to identify the failure pattern, decide whether the team is looking at a real product regression or a flake, and preserve enough evidence for a targeted fix.

Use And Do Not Use

Use for:

• CI jobs where tests fail intermittently and pass on retry.
• JUnit XML, pytest/Jest/RSpec/Go test reports, Playwright traces, browser logs, or copied CI logs.
• Estimating wasted CI minutes and developer time from reruns.
• Deciding whether to quarantine, mark unstable, fix immediately, add instrumentation, or reject a flaky-test excuse.
• Building a concise issue comment, incident note, or test-owner handoff.

Do not use for:

• Hiding real product regressions behind "probably flaky" language.
• Deleting or disabling tests without owner approval and replacement coverage.
• Debugging a live production incident where CI logs are only a side signal.
• Sending logs to external services without explicit user approval.

Required Inputs

Ask only for missing inputs that materially affect the decision:

• Test report path, pasted failure text, or CI log path.
• Framework and CI system when known.
• Whether the same commit passed on retry or failed on multiple branches.
• Recent failure history, such as run counts, failure counts, rerun-pass counts, or links to prior CI runs.
• Cost context if available: average job minutes, runs per day, and approximate staff cost.
• Ownership constraints: test owner, code area, release blocker status, and whether quarantine is allowed.

If the user only has a single failure log, produce a sample-limited report and label flake confidence as provisional.

Workflow

1. Preserve Evidence Before Recommending A Fix

Capture:

• Commit SHA, branch, CI job, runner image, timestamp, and retry count.
• Exact test names and failure messages.
• Whether the same test passed on rerun without code changes.
• Environmental clues: browser version, timezone, locale, network service, seed, parallel worker, CPU/memory pressure, container image, and external dependency.

Read references/flaky-test-rules.md when the failure involves timing, async UI, network, parallelism, fixture leakage, external services, or suspicious rerun behavior.

2. Run Local Forensics When Files Exist

Use the bundled script for JUnit XML, CI logs, and optional history CSV:

python3 flaky-ci-forensics/scripts/flaky_ci_forensics.py \
  --junit /absolute/path/junit.xml \
  --log /absolute/path/ci.log \
  --history /absolute/path/history.csv \
  --avg-job-minutes 12 \
  --runs-per-day 80

History CSV columns are optional but should use these names when available:

test,runs,failures,rerun_passes,first_seen,last_seen,owner

For pasted logs, apply the same taxonomy manually and state that XML/history metrics are unavailable.

3. Classify The Failure

Classify each failing test into one primary bucket:

• timeout_or_wait: timeouts, missing waits, event-loop starvation, animation or async readiness.
• network_or_external_service: connection resets, DNS, third-party sandbox, rate limits, HTTP 5xx.
• order_or_state_leak: test pollution, shared database state, global mocks, random ordering.
• parallelism_or_race: thread/process race, port collision, shared temp paths, non-atomic setup.
• clock_locale_or_randomness: timezone, daylight saving, locale, seeded randomness, date boundaries.
• resource_or_runner: CPU/memory pressure, disk space, browser crash, CI image drift.
• selector_or_ui_sync: brittle selectors, detached elements, React hydration, stale DOM handles.
• assertion_or_product_regression: deterministic assertion mismatch or likely product behavior change.
• unknown_needs_instrumentation: not enough evidence to classify.

Never call a deterministic assertion mismatch a flake just because the team wants the build green.

4. Decide Action

Use this action ladder:

• Fix now: high confidence product regression, high-frequency flake blocking release, or unsafe false-pass risk.
• Instrument then rerun: unknown cause, low evidence, or missing logs that can be captured cheaply.
• Quarantine with owner and expiry: high-confidence flake, repeated retry-pass evidence, and an allowed quarantine policy.
• Rerun once only: CI infrastructure blip with weak recurrence evidence and low release risk.
• Do not quarantine: security, billing, data-loss, migration, auth, or compliance coverage where disabling the test creates unacceptable risk.

5. Produce The Triage Report

Return:

## CI Decision
[Fix now / Instrument then rerun / Quarantine with owner and expiry / Rerun once only / Do not quarantine]

## Failure Cluster
| Test | Bucket | Flake confidence | Evidence | Owner | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

## Cost And Frequency
[CI minutes, developer interruption estimate, failure rate, retry-pass signal]

## Likely Root Cause
[Concrete hypothesis tied to evidence]

## Minimal Fix Plan
[Smallest code/test/infrastructure change to test first]

## Instrumentation To Add
[Logs, screenshots, traces, seeds, timestamps, runner metadata]

## Guardrails
[What not to disable, what requires owner approval, when to expire quarantine]

Examples And Acceptance Checks

Positive example: "Use $flaky-ci-forensics on this GitHub Actions JUnit report. The Playwright checkout test fails with a selector timeout but passes on rerun." The skill should classify selector_or_ui_sync or timeout_or_wait, estimate rerun cost if history exists, and recommend instrumentation or a targeted wait/selector fix before quarantine.

Positive backend example: "Our pytest suite fails randomly with duplicate key errors under -n auto." The skill should classify order/state leak or parallelism, ask for seed/worker/db isolation evidence, and avoid generic "rerun CI" advice.

Negative example: "A unit test always fails after I changed the parser." Do not label it flaky without retry-pass or environment evidence; treat it as a regression-debugging task.

Boundary example: "I only have a screenshot that says CI failed." Produce a missing-evidence checklist and do not assign high flake confidence.

Validation

Smoke-test the bundled fixture:

python3 flaky-ci-forensics/scripts/flaky_ci_forensics.py \
  --junit flaky-ci-forensics/scripts/fixtures/junit.xml \
  --log flaky-ci-forensics/scripts/fixtures/ci.log \
  --history flaky-ci-forensics/scripts/fixtures/history.csv \
  --avg-job-minutes 14 \
  --runs-per-day 60

Expected result: a Markdown report with CI Decision, buckets including timeout_or_wait and network_or_external_service, a retry-pass signal, and a cost estimate.