agentsclimarketplace

Nw test refactoring catalog

Skill nWave-ai/nWave/plugins/nw/skills/nw-test-refactoring-catalog

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.

Install
npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-test-refactoring-catalog

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Detailed refactoring mechanics with step-by-step procedures, and test code smell catalog with detection patterns and before/after examples

SKILL.md

3.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Test Refactoring Catalog

Test Code Smells (Full Detail)

L1 Readability Smells

Obscure Test

  • Problem: test name does not reveal business scenario being tested
  • Detection: generic names like Test1(), ProcessOrderTest(), or names requiring reading test body to understand
  • Solution: rename to Given_When_Then or should_do_expected_thing_when_condition format
Before: public void Test1() { /* ... */ }
After:  public void ProcessOrder_PremiumCustomer_AppliesCorrectDiscount() { /* ... */ }

Hard-Coded Test Data

  • Problem: magic numbers and strings obscure business rules being tested
  • Detection: numbers like 1000, 0.15, strings without explanation
  • Solution: extract to named constants that reveal business meaning
Before: Assert.Equal(850, result.Total);  // What discount?
After:  const decimal EXPECTED_TOTAL = 1000 * (1 - 0.15m);
        Assert.Equal(EXPECTED_TOTAL, result.Total);

Assertion Roulette

  • Problem: multiple assertions without messages make failures unclear
  • Detection: multiple Assert.* calls without message parameter
  • Solution: add descriptive message to each assertion explaining expected business outcome

L2 Complexity Smells

Eager Test

  • Problem: single test verifies multiple unrelated behaviors
  • Detection: multiple arrange/act/assert cycles or assertions testing different concerns
  • Solution: split into focused tests, one per business scenario
Before: ProcessOrderTest() { /* tests discount AND shipping AND tax */ }
After:  ProcessOrder_AppliesDiscount()
        ProcessOrder_CalculatesShipping()
        ProcessOrder_CalculatesTax()

Prefer parameterized tests for variations of the same behavior.

Test Code Duplication

  • Problem: repeated test setup logic across multiple tests
  • Detection: same object creation, mock setup, or data builders copied in 3+ tests
  • Solution: extract helper methods
Extract: CreatePremiumCustomer(), CreateHighValueOrder()

Conditional Test Logic

  • Problem: if/switch statements in test code make tests non-deterministic
  • Detection: if, switch, for loops in test methods
  • Solution: replace with parameterized tests
# Before: if/else in test
# After:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [...])
def test_behavior(input, expected): ...

L3 Organization Smells

Mystery Guest

  • Problem: test depends on external files or hidden dependencies
  • Detection: File.ReadAllText, database queries, external config in tests
  • Solution: inline test data or make dependency explicit in test setup

Test Class Bloat

  • Problem: single test class contains tests for multiple unrelated concerns
  • Detection: test class with 15+ tests covering different features
  • Solution: split by feature
Before: UserServiceTests (31 tests)
After:  UserAuthTests, UserProfileTests, UserNotificationTests

General Fixture

  • Problem: shared fixture used by tests with different needs
  • Detection: SetUp method creates data used by only some tests
  • Solution: move to per-test setup methods or test-specific fixtures

For production code refactoring techniques and mechanics, load the progressive-refactoring skill.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.