Nw quality validation
Skill nWave-ai/nWave/plugins/nw/skills/nw-quality-validation
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-quality-validationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment
SKILL.md
2.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Quality Validation
Six Quality Characteristics
- Accuracy: Factually correct, technically sound, current | Validation: expert review, automated testing
- Completeness: All necessary info present for doc type | Validation: checklist, gap analysis
- Clarity: Easy to understand, logical flow, appropriate level | Validation: Flesch 70-80
- Consistency: Uniform terminology, formatting, structure | Validation: style guide compliance
- Correctness: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation | Validation: automated check, zero errors
- Usability: User achieves goal efficiently | Validation: task success, DIVIO type purpose served
Quality Gate Thresholds
| Metric | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Readability (Flesch) | 70-80 |
| Spelling errors | 0 |
| Broken links | 0 |
| Style compliance | 95%+ |
| Type purity | 80%+ single type |
Type-Specific Validation Checklists
Tutorial Checklist
- Completable without external references | [ ] Steps numbered and sequential
- Each step has verifiable outcome | [ ] No assumed prior knowledge | [ ] Builds confidence
How-to Checklist
- Clear goal stated upfront | [ ] Assumes fundamentals known
- Single task focus | [ ] Ends with completion indicator | [ ] No basics teaching
Reference Checklist
- All parameters documented | [ ] Return values specified
- Error conditions listed | [ ] Examples per entry | [ ] No narrative
Explanation Checklist
- Addresses "why" not "what" | [ ] Provides context and reasoning
- Discusses alternatives | [ ] No task steps | [ ] Builds conceptual model
Verdict Criteria
- approved: Passes all type-specific validation, no collapse violations, meets quality gates
- needs-revision: Minor issues fixable in place (clarity, missing examples, small gaps)
- restructure-required: Collapse detected requiring split, or fundamental type mismatch