agentsclimarketplace

Nw review workflow

Skill nWave-ai/nWave/nWave/skills/nw-review-workflow

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.

Install
npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-review-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Detailed review process, v2 validation checklist, and scoring methodology for agent definition reviews

SKILL.md

3.0 KB, 682 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Agent Review Workflow

V2 Validation Checklist (11 Points)

Run against every agent under review. Each item pass/fail.

  1. Frontmatter format: --- delimited YAML with name and description
  2. Size compliance: Under 400 lines; domain knowledge in Skills
  3. Divergence-only: Only behaviors diverging from Claude defaults
  4. Calm language: No "CRITICAL", "MANDATORY", "ABSOLUTE"
  5. Examples present: 3-5 canonical for critical/subtle behaviors
  6. Least privilege tools: Minimum needed in frontmatter
  7. maxTurns set: Present in frontmatter
  8. Platform safety: Via frontmatter/hooks, not prose
  9. Affirmative phrasing: "Do X" not "Don't do Y"
  10. Consistent terminology: One term per concept
  11. Clear delegation: Description states when to delegate

Scoring Methodology

Per-Dimension Scoring

For each of 7 critique dimensions (from critique-dimensions skill):

  • Pass: All checks satisfied
  • Fail: One or more checks not satisfied

Verdict Logic

IF any high-severity dimension fails:
  verdict = "revisions_needed"
ELIF count(medium-severity failures) >= 3:
  verdict = "revisions_needed"
ELSE:
  verdict = "approved"

High-severity: template_compliance, size_and_focus, safety_implementation, priority_validation Medium-severity: divergence_quality, language_and_tone, examples_quality

Evidence Requirements

Every finding includes: Dimension (which of 7) | Severity (high/medium/low) | Finding (observed, with line numbers/counts) | Recommendation (specific fix action)

Common V1 to V2 Migration Issues

Residual PatternWhat to Flag
Embedded YAML config blocksShould be frontmatter or removed
activation-instructions sectionRemove -- Claude Code handles activation
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION sectionRemove -- not needed in v2
commands with 10+ entriesReduce to 3-5 focused
Inline embed_knowledgeExtract to Skills
5+ "production frameworks"Remove -- platform handles safety
CRITICAL: prefixed instructionsRephrase as calm direct statements
Python/YAML safety code examplesRemove -- aspirational, not executable

Peer Review Protocol

  1. Receive agent file path from builder
  2. Execute full dimension review
  3. Return structured YAML verdict
  4. If revisions_needed, include prioritized fix list
  5. Builder revises and resubmits (max 2 iterations)
  6. On second rejection, escalate to user

Command Template Review

Additional checks for nWave command files (tasks):

  • Size: 50-60 lines target; >60 warning, >150 major, >500 blocker
  • Structure: agent activation metadata, context files section, success criteria
  • Delegation: business logic belongs in agent, not command
  • No embedded procedural steps (STEP 1, STEP 2)

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.