Nw post mortem framework
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.
npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-post-mortem-frameworkAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Blameless post-mortem structure, incident timeline reconstruction, response evaluation, and organizational learning
SKILL.md
3.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Post-Mortem Framework
Principles
- Blameless: focus on systems/processes, not individuals. People make reasonable decisions given available info.
- Evidence-based: every finding backed by logs, metrics, or documented actions
- Action-oriented: every finding produces concrete, assigned action item
- Learning-focused: capture what worked alongside what failed
Post-Mortem Document Structure
# Post-Mortem: [Incident Title]
**Date**: [incident date]
**Duration**: [start to resolution]
**Severity**: [P0-P3]
**Author**: [analyst]
## Summary
[2-3 sentence overview: what happened, impact, resolution]
## Timeline
| Time | Event | Source |
|------|-------|--------|
| HH:MM | [event] | [log/metric/report] |
## Impact
- Users affected: [number/percentage]
- Duration of impact: [time]
- Business impact: [quantified if possible]
- Systems affected: [list]
## Root Cause Analysis
[5 Whys analysis with evidence at each level]
## Detection and Response
- Time to detect: [duration] -- [how detected]
- Time to respond: [duration] -- [first action]
- Time to mitigate: [duration] -- [mitigation applied]
- Time to resolve: [duration] -- [permanent fix]
## What Went Well
- [positive observations about detection, response, recovery]
## What Could Be Improved
- [areas where detection, response, recovery fell short]
## Action Items
| ID | Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date |
|----|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | [specific action] | [team/person] | [P0-P3] | [date] |
## Lessons Learned
- [key takeaways for the organization]
Incident Timeline Reconstruction
Sources
- Monitoring alerts/dashboards (timestamps) | 2. Deployment logs/CI-CD records
- Communication channels (Slack, email, incident) | 4. VCS (commits, merges, deploys) | 5. User reports/support tickets
Quality Checks
Events chronological with verified timestamps | gaps >5 min noted/explained | decision points identified with available info | causal relationships noted
Response Effectiveness Evaluation
Detection
Detected by monitoring or users? | Duration onset-to-detection? | Existing alerts relevant? Missing?
Escalation
Right team at right time? | Procedures followed? | Communication clear to stakeholders?
Resolution
Mitigation effective? | Rollback considered/viable? | Duration mitigation-to-permanent-fix?
Organizational Learning
Knowledge Capture
Document root causes as reusable patterns | update runbooks | share in retrospectives
Process Improvements
Update monitoring/alerting per detection gaps | revise deployment per rollback effectiveness | strengthen testing for failure scenario
Action Item Tracking
Every item has owner + due date | track in standups/sprint reviews | verify effectiveness post-deployment