Ru legal contract review
Skill ni032mas/agent-skills-ru/skills/ru-legal-contract-review
Russian AI agent skills for legal, compliance, business, product and engineering workflows
npx -y skills add ni032mas/agent-skills-ru --skill ru-legal-contract-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when reviewing Russian-law contracts, offers, policies, personal-data/Roskomnadzor compliance, or legal wording for Russian businesses; triggers include РФ, ГК РФ, 152-ФЗ, 149-ФЗ, РКН, ПДн, договор, оферта, NDA, SaaS, license, service agreement.
SKILL.md
4.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Russian Legal Contract Review
Use this skill for practical first-pass legal review under Russian realities. It is legal-risk analysis, not a substitute for a licensed lawyer's final advice.
Current-Law Gate
Russian law and Roskomnadzor practice change often. Before giving a current legal answer, verify the applicable text live or state that the answer is not current-verified.
When the task depends on current law, cite the source, act name/number, article or clause, and редакция/date. Do not rely only on model memory or a copied old text.
Read references/sources.md when the user asks about statutes, Роскомнадзор, персональные данные, ГК РФ, 152-ФЗ, 149-ФЗ, 143-ФЗ, or "последние изменения".
Intake
Identify or ask for the missing facts that change the risk analysis:
- our side: заказчик, исполнитель, продавец, покупатель, правообладатель, лицензиат, оператор ПДн, обработчик;
- counterparty status: ООО, ИП, самозанятый, физлицо, иностранная компания;
- B2B, B2C, employment, agency, license, SaaS, services, sale, marketplace, advertising, data processing;
- applicable law, jurisdiction, venue, arbitration clause, mandatory претензионный порядок;
- data flows: categories of ПДн, subjects, purposes, storage location, processors, cross-border transfer, biometrics, data allowed for dissemination;
- money and paperwork: price, НДС, withholding, currency, invoices, acts, УПД, EDI, e-signature, acceptance;
- intellectual property: exclusive/non-exclusive license, alienation, work made for hire, source code, models, content, trademarks.
If "143-ФЗ" appears in a Roskomnadzor/personal-data context, treat it as ambiguous. Clarify whether the user means 149-ФЗ, 152-ФЗ, 242-ФЗ/localization, or the actual 143-ФЗ cited in the document.
Review Workflow
- Check document completeness: title, parties, реквизиты, dates, exhibits, referenced policies, blank fields, signatures, attachments.
- Classify the document and our side before calling a term "bad" or "market".
- Map mandatory Russian-law issues with
references/checklists.md. - Separate legal risk from business risk and operational risk.
- Prefer concrete rewrites over abstract advice.
- Mark unresolved assumptions explicitly.
Output
For document review, use:
Короткий вывод: whether it is signable, signable after fixes, or not ready.Критичные блокеры: terms that can make the deal unenforceable, illegal, impossible to operate, or materially unsafe.Таблица рисков: clause, risk, why it matters under РФ context, proposed fix.Что переписать: ready-to-paste Russian wording when possible.Вопросы перед подписанием: only questions that materially affect the conclusion.Источники: links and редакция/date for laws or official guidance used.
For compliance/personal-data questions, add:
- operator/processor role;
- lawful basis and consent need;
- RKN notification status;
- localization and cross-border transfer;
- privacy policy and consent texts;
- breach/incident duties;
- security measures owner: legal, organizational, technical.
Boundaries
- Do not invent court practice, RKN positions, or article numbers.
- Do not present unofficial blogs as law; use them only for orientation and verify against primary or authoritative sources.
- Do not give tax, criminal, labor, or regulated-industry conclusions as final without flagging the need for specialist review.
- Do not keep large statutory excerpts in the skill. Laws must be checked live.