Ask me
Production ready. AI Agent Workflow System for Claude Code
npx -y skills add ngocsangyem/MeowKit --skill ask-meAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 15 stars15 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).
SKILL.md
5.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
mk:ask-me
Overview
Answer questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions,
workflows, rationale, constraints — with minimal cited file:line evidence.
Gives the agent deep, fast project understanding instead of long grep/search
sessions. Read-only by default; the answer is the deliverable.
Route first
Classify the request before gathering evidence. If a specialist owns it, name that skill and stop; do not partially answer. The complete routing table is references/specialist-routes.md.
This skill answers what is true, how it works here, why it exists, and what constraints apply — about the current project only.
When to Use
Auto-activate on:
- "how does X work here / in this project / in this repo"
- "what does X mean" (project file, config, convention)
- "why is X structured this way"
- "is it true that ... in this repo" (claim-check)
- "what constraints apply before touching X"
- "explain X with sources / citations"
Explicit: /mk:ask-me [question] [--depth quick|standard|deep] [--save-to <path>]
Do NOT invoke when: the request matches any Redirect First row, asks to change code, or is a pure general-knowledge question (answer those directly, no scouting).
Process
- Route check. Match against Redirect First. Owned elsewhere → name the skill, stop.
- Parse. Extract the question. Infer kind: factual, explanation, rationale,
constraint-summary, or claim-check. Depth:
standardunless flagged. - Minimal evidence plan. Prefer user-provided paths; else grep targeted keywords. Docs/project context first, then targeted code/config. Apply the forbidden-path list below.
- Bounded gather. Read only relevant slices within the depth budget. Stop
as soon as the answer is sufficiently supported. Track
path:linefor every source-backed claim. - Synthesize. Direct answer first; separate verified claims from inference; state confidence (high/medium/low — mandatory); list limitations; mention a related specialist skill only if the user's next likely action leaves scope.
- Optional save. Only via
--save-toor explicit request, per the save-path policy below. On unsafe path or conflict, refuse the write and return the answer inline.
Depth budgets and output/failure contracts: references/answer-contract.md.
Forbidden Paths (never read)
.env*, secrets/keys/credentials/tokens of any kind, .meowkit/memory/,
session-state/, dependency dirs (node_modules/, .venv/), build outputs,
browser profiles. No WebSearch — current-docs lookup belongs to mk:docs-finder.
Save-Path Policy
Write only when asked, and only under: an explicit user path inside the project
root, tasks/reports/, or ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/ask-me/. Path escapes a safe
root → refuse and answer inline. Target exists → ask before overwrite or use a
timestamped name.
Answer contract
Return a direct answer, confidence, cited evidence, and only needed inference/limitations. Include one related specialist only when the likely next action leaves this scope. Load references/answer-contract.md for the exact template and failure handling.
Workflow Integration
On-demand — no single phase anchor; usable at any point from Phase 0 (orient) through Phase 6 (reflect). Does not gate or feed any phase artifact.
Handoff Protocol
The answer is terminal by default — no agent receives it. If the user's next action leaves this skill's scope, point to the single owning specialist skill (one pointer, never auto-invoke it).
Gotchas
- Don't turn an answer request into a plan — the answer IS the deliverable.
- Don't over-scout: stop at sufficiency, not at budget exhaustion.
- Don't answer option-selection questions; route them (
mk:party/mk:brainstorming). - Never cite project facts without
path:linesources; unsourced points go under Inference. - Missing docs lower confidence but don't block — fall back to targeted code/config reads.
- "How does [library] work" is
mk:docs-finderterritory; this skill only answers "how does X work in this project".