Browser automation
Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agentFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add newmindsgroup/ai-agent-skills-library --skill browser-automationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.0 KB, 565 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Browser Automation
Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agent interactions. The difference between a flaky script and a reliable system comes down to understanding selectors, waiting strategies, and anti-detection patterns.
This skill covers Playwright (recommended) and Puppeteer, with patterns for testing, scraping, and agentic browser control. Key insight: Playwright won the framework war. Unless you need Puppeteer's stealth ecosystem or are Chrome-only, Playwright is the better choice in 2025.
Critical distinction: Testing automation (predictable apps you control) vs scraping/agent automation (unpredictable sites that fight back). Different problems, different solutions.
When to Use
- User mentions or implies: playwright
- User mentions or implies: puppeteer
- User mentions or implies: browser automation
- User mentions or implies: headless
- User mentions or implies: web scraping
- User mentions or implies: e2e test
- User mentions or implies: end-to-end
- User mentions or implies: selenium
- User mentions or implies: chromium
- User mentions or implies: browser test
Core Workflow
- Confirm the request matches this skill's trigger, scope, and risk profile.
- Use the topic map to identify the relevant pattern, checklist, or example before writing detailed guidance or code.
- Load
references/full-guidance.mdwhen implementation details, examples, anti-patterns, validation checks, or edge cases are needed. - Apply only the relevant guidance instead of loading or repeating the entire reference by default.
- Verify the result against any validation checks, limitations, security notes, or platform constraints in the reference.
Topic Map
- Principles
- Capabilities
- Scope
- Tooling
- Frameworks
- Stealth_tools
- Cloud_browsers
- Patterns
- Test Isolation Pattern
- Playwright Test Example
- Shared Authentication Pattern
- User-Facing Locator Pattern
- Good Examples (User-Facing)
- Bad Examples (Fragile)
- Filtering and Chaining
- Auto-Wait Pattern
- Wrong - Manual Waits
- Correct - Let Auto-Wait Work
Reference Map
references/full-guidance.mdpreserves the complete original guidance, including examples and detailed edge cases.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Progressive Loading
Keep this SKILL.md as the compact routing and workflow entrypoint. Load the reference file only when the user task requires the deeper implementation material.
What ships with it: 1 file
28.7 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- full-guidance.md28.7 KB