Debugging
38 portable Agent Skills for disciplined, reviewable AI-assisted work across Codex, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and compatible agents.
npx -y skills add nevitonsantana/adaptive-skills --skill debuggingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Reproduce, isolate, fix, and guard against recurrence instead of patching symptoms by instinct.
SKILL.md
2.7 KB, 528 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Overview
Use this skill when behavior is wrong and you need disciplined diagnosis rather than guesswork.
When to Use
- runtime bugs
- failing tests
- inconsistent or surprising behavior
When NOT to Use
- when the issue has not been observed
- when the work is actually a redesign request
Core Moves
- Make the failure observable.
- Reduce the search area.
- Form and test a plausible cause.
- Fix the cause, not only the symptom.
- Run proof against recurrence.
Optional Modules
- Instrumentation pass — Add temporary logs or visibility when the failure is opaque.
- Boundary check — Inspect upstream and downstream assumptions when the issue crosses layers.
- Recurrence guard — Add a focused automated or procedural guard after the fix.
- Feedback loop construction — Build or identify a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal before changing code. Prefer the smallest loop that reproduces the failure: a focused failing test, a CLI run over a fixture, a reproducible HTTP request, a headless browser script, a real trace or payload replayed in isolation, a throwaway harness, or a property/fuzz loop for intermittent bugs. Specific tools are examples — any loop that yields a deterministic pass/fail counts.
Activation Triggers
- Use instrumentation when you cannot see the failure shape clearly.
- Use the boundary check when multiple systems may be contributing.
- Use the recurrence guard when the bug was expensive or likely to repeat.
- Use feedback loop construction when the failure is not yet reproducible, when the bug is intermittent, or when changing code without a pass/fail signal would be guesswork.
Expected Output
- repro path
- likely root cause
- validated fix
- recurrence guard or rationale for skipping one
Verification
- The original failure is reproducible or otherwise evidenced.
- The fix changes the cause, not only the visible outcome.
- The validation exercises the failure path.
- A concrete pass/fail signal exists, or the reason it cannot exist is stated.
- The loop is small enough to run during the debugging session.
- The fix is checked against the original failure path through that loop.
Handoff Signals
- The issue moves outside the current technical boundary.
- A domain expert is needed to interpret the failure safely.
Pairs Well With
testingcode-style
Anti-patterns
- Changing multiple things before isolating the bug.
- Calling a symptom a root cause.
- Stopping after the error disappears once.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.