Netbox review datamodel

NetBox Data Model Review

Your knowledge of NetBox data models may be outdated. Available model types, relationships, and extensibility mechanisms evolve between releases. Verify against current docs before recommending changes.

Retrieval Sources

Source	URL / Method	Use for
Data model docs	https://netboxlabs.com/docs/netbox/models/	All available model types
Custom fields docs	https://netboxlabs.com/docs/netbox/customization/custom-fields/	Field types and behavior
Custom Objects docs	https://netboxlabs.com/docs/extensions/custom-objects/	No-code extensibility
NetBox MCP server	If configured — inspect the current data model, count objects, find inconsistencies	Live model audit

Review Workflow

Follow this checklist when auditing a NetBox data model:

1. Understand the organization — what kind of network? (enterprise, DC, ISP, hybrid)
2. Check hierarchy — is the Region → Site Group → Site → Location → Rack hierarchy appropriate?
3. Check IPAM — are prefixes properly nested? VRFs used where needed? Aggregates defined?
4. Check naming — are slugs consistent? Are names human-readable and grep-friendly?
5. Check extensibility choices — custom fields vs tags vs config contexts vs custom objects
6. Check tenancy — is multi-tenancy used correctly? Over-tenanted or under-tenanted?
7. Check for modeling smell — overloaded fields, misuse of description for structured data

Critical Rules

Hierarchy (HIER)

ID	Rule	Severity
HIER-1	Use Regions for geography, Site Groups for function — don't conflate	High
HIER-2	Locations are recursive — don't flatten (Floor > Room > Row is better than Row alone)	Medium
HIER-3	Every device should be in a Site (never orphaned at top level)	High
HIER-4	Racks should have a Location when the site has locations defined	Medium
HIER-5	Don't create single-child hierarchies — they add complexity without value	Low
HIER-6	On 4.6+, RackGroups offer a flat, cross-location way to group racks (e.g. "cage-7", "cold-aisle-B") independent of the Location tree — use them when rack grouping doesn't map cleanly onto site/location nesting, not as a substitute for Locations	Low

IPAM (IPAM)

ID	Rule	Severity
IPAM-1	Define RIR Aggregates to track address space allocation boundaries	Medium
IPAM-2	Prefixes should nest correctly (child within parent CIDR)	High
IPAM-3	Use VRFs to separate overlapping address spaces — never duplicate prefixes in global table	Critical
IPAM-4	IP Addresses must have prefix length (/32 for loopbacks, actual mask for interfaces)	High
IPAM-5	Use Roles to classify prefix purpose (infrastructure, customer, management); on NetBox 4.6+ ASNs can also carry a Role — use it to classify ASN purpose	Medium
IPAM-6	VLANs should be in VLAN Groups with an appropriate scope. Scope can be Region/SiteGroup/Site/Location/Rack/ClusterGroup/Cluster (and RackGroup on 4.6+) — don't assume site/location are the only options; pick the tightest scope that matches the VLANs' reuse boundary	Medium

Device Modeling (DEV)

ID	Rule	Severity
DEV-1	Every device needs a Device Type (not just a name) — this enables port planning	High
DEV-2	Use Roles to classify function (router, switch, firewall) — not naming convention alone	High
DEV-3	Platforms indicate software — assign them for config template compatibility	Medium
DEV-4	Virtual chassis members should have proper VC position and master assignment	Medium
DEV-5	Interface types must match reality (1000base-t vs 10gbase-sr) for capacity planning	Medium

Extensibility (EXT)

ID	Rule	Severity
EXT-1	Use custom fields for single-valued structured data attached to one object type	—
EXT-2	Use tags for cross-object-type classification and boolean "has this property"	—
EXT-3	Use config contexts for hierarchical key-value data that merges by scope	—
EXT-4	Use custom objects when you need a new first-class entity with its own relationships	—
EXT-5	Never store structured data (JSON, lists) in description or comments fields	High
EXT-6	Don't create custom fields that duplicate built-in fields (e.g., custom "location" field)	High
EXT-7	Prefer custom objects over dozens of custom fields when the data is really a related entity	Medium
EXT-8	On 4.6+, attach a validation_schema (JSON Schema) to JSON custom fields to enforce structure instead of leaving them free-form; flag JSON fields holding structured data with no schema	Medium

Naming (NAME)

ID	Rule	Severity
NAME-1	Slugs should be lowercase, hyphenated, grep-friendly (nyc-dc1 not NYC_DC1)	Medium
NAME-2	Device names should encode location + function + index (sw-nyc-dc1-01)	Low
NAME-3	Be consistent — pick one naming scheme and apply it everywhere	High
NAME-4	Avoid embedding metadata in names (don't put VLAN ID in site name)	Medium

Tenancy (TEN)

ID	Rule	Severity
TEN-1	Use tenants for logical ownership boundaries (customer, department, project)	—
TEN-2	Don't over-tenant — if everything belongs to one tenant, you probably don't need tenancy	Medium
TEN-3	Tenant Groups organize tenants hierarchically (e.g., by business unit)	Low
TEN-4	Shared infrastructure (management networks, core routers) can be untenanted	Medium

Anti-Patterns to Flag

Anti-Pattern	Why It Matters	Fix
Flat site hierarchy (no locations)	Can't track floor/room/row placement	Add Location hierarchy
All IPs in global VRF with duplicates	IPAM conflicts, broken reports	Separate into VRFs
Custom fields used as foreign keys	No referential integrity, hard to query	Use custom objects or tags
JSON blobs in description fields	Not searchable, not validated, not filterable	Use custom fields or config contexts
One giant "catch-all" custom field per type	Defeats the purpose of structured data	Split into individual fields
Devices without Device Types	Loses port/bay/slot modeling	Always specify hardware model
Mixing naming conventions	Impossible to script against, confusing	Standardize and bulk-rename
Tags with spaces or special characters	Breaks API filtering, scripts	Use slug-friendly tag names
Over-nested regions (> 3 levels)	Adds complexity without improving navigation	Flatten to 2-3 levels max
Prefix hierarchy gaps	Parent/child relationships broken	Fill missing intermediate prefixes

Scope

This skill covers data model design and organization. It does NOT cover:

• Code that interacts with the API → use netbox-review-integration
• How to model from scratch → use netbox-data-modeling
• Custom Objects plugin specifics → use netbox-custom-objects

Principles

• Context matters. A 5-site enterprise has different needs than a 500-site ISP. Don't over-engineer.
• Audit the real instance. If MCP is available, query actual data rather than reviewing documentation alone.
• Suggest, don't dictate. Many modeling choices are valid — flag clear anti-patterns, but acknowledge trade-offs for judgment calls.
• Prioritize data integrity. Issues that cause broken relationships or duplicate data are more important than cosmetic naming issues.
• Consider migration cost. Flagging an anti-pattern is more useful if you also explain how hard it is to fix with existing data.