Neo4j modeling skill
Neo4j Skills for Coding and other Agents including Cypher
npx -y skills add neo4j-contrib/neo4j-skills --skill neo4j-modeling-skillAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Design, review, and refactor Neo4j graph data models. Use when choosing node labels vs relationship types vs properties, migrating relational/document schemas to graph, detecting anti-patterns (generic labels, supernodes, missing constraints), designing intermediate nodes for n-ary relationships, enforcing schema with constraints and indexes, or assessing an existing model against graph modeling best practices. Does NOT handle Cypher query authoring — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT handle Spring Data Neo4j entity mapping — use neo4j-spring-data-skill. Does NOT handle GraphQL type definitions — use neo4j-graphql-skill. Does NOT handle data import — use neo4j-import-skill.
SKILL.md
15.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
When to Use
- Designing graph model from scratch (domain → nodes, rels, props)
- Reviewing existing model for anti-patterns
- Deciding node vs property vs relationship vs label
- Migrating relational or document schema to graph
- Designing intermediate nodes for n-ary or complex relationships
- Detecting and mitigating supernode / high-fanout problems
- Choosing and creating constraints + indexes for a model
When NOT to Use
- Writing or optimizing Cypher →
neo4j-cypher-skill - Spring Data Neo4j (@Node, @Relationship) →
neo4j-spring-data-skill - GraphQL type definitions →
neo4j-graphql-skill - Importing data (LOAD CSV, APOC import) →
neo4j-import-skill
Inspect Before Designing
On existing database, run first — never propose changes without current state:
CALL db.schema.visualization() YIELD nodes, relationships RETURN nodes, relationships;
SHOW CONSTRAINTS YIELD name, type, labelsOrTypes, properties RETURN name, type, labelsOrTypes, properties;
SHOW INDEXES YIELD name, type, labelsOrTypes, state WHERE state = 'ONLINE' RETURN name, type, labelsOrTypes;
If APOC available:
CALL apoc.meta.schema() YIELD value RETURN value;
MCP tool map:
| Operation | Tool |
|---|---|
| Inspect schema | get-schema |
SHOW CONSTRAINTS, SHOW INDEXES | read-cypher |
CREATE CONSTRAINT ... IF NOT EXISTS | write-cypher (show + confirm first) |
Defaults — Apply to Every Model
- Use-case first — list 5+ queries the model must answer before designing
- Nodes = entities (nouns) with identity; rels = connections (verbs) with direction
- Labels PascalCase; rel types SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE; properties camelCase
- Every node type used in MERGE has a uniqueness constraint on its key property
- Add property type constraints (
REQUIRE n.prop IS :: STRING) where the type is known — helps the query planner and catches bad writes early - No generic labels (
:Entity,:Node,:Thing); no generic rel types (:RELATED_TO,:HAS) - Security labels (used for row-level access control) should start with a common prefix (e.g.
Sec) so application code can reliably filter them out of the domain schema - Rel direction encodes semantic meaning — not arbitrary
- Inspect schema before proposing any change on an existing database
- All constraint/index DDL uses
IF NOT EXISTS— safe to rerun - On Neo4j 2026.02+ (Enterprise/Aura): consider
ALTER CURRENT GRAPH TYPE SET { … }orEXTEND GRAPH TYPE WITH { … }to declare the full model in one block instead of individualCREATE CONSTRAINTstatements — seeneo4j-cypher-skill/references/graph-type.md. PREVIEW — syntax may change before GA.
Key Patterns
Node vs Relationship vs Property — Decision Table
| Question | Answer | Model as |
|---|---|---|
| Is it a thing with identity, queried as entry point? | Yes | Node |
| Is it a connection between two things with direction? | Yes | Relationship |
| Does the connection have its own properties or multiple targets? | Yes | Intermediate node |
| Is it a scalar always returned with its parent, never filtered alone? | Yes | Property on parent |
| Is it a category used for type-based filtering or path traversal? | Yes | Label (not a property) |
| Does the same attribute value repeat across many nodes (low cardinality)? | Yes | Label, not a property node |
| Is it a fact connecting >2 entities? | Yes | Intermediate node |
Property vs Label — Decision Table
| Use label when | Use property when |
|---|---|
Values are few, fixed, used as traversal filters (WHERE n:Active) | Values are many, dynamic, or unique per node |
You traverse by type (MATCH (n:VIPCustomer)) | You filter by value (WHERE n.tier = 'vip') |
| Category drives index selection | Fine-grained value drives range scans |
Example: :Active, :Verified, :Premium | Example: status, score, email |
Rule: adding a label is cheap; scanning all :Label nodes is fast. Never model high-cardinality values as labels.
Intermediate Node Pattern
Use when a relationship needs its own properties, connects >2 entities, or is independently queryable.
Before (relationship with property — limited):
(Person)-[:ACTED_IN {role: "Neo"}]->(Movie)
// Cannot query roles independent of movies
After (intermediate node — queryable, extensible):
(Person)-[:PLAYED]->(Role {name: "Neo"})-[:IN]->(Movie)
// MATCH (r:Role) WHERE r.name STARTS WITH 'Neo' RETURN r
Employment overlap example:
// Find colleagues who overlapped at same company
MATCH (p1:Person)-[:WORKED_AT]->(e1:Employment)-[:AT]->(c:Company)<-[:AT]-(e2:Employment)<-[:WORKED_AT]-(p2:Person)
WHERE p1 <> p2
AND e1.startDate <= e2.endDate AND e2.startDate <= e1.endDate
RETURN p1.name, p2.name, c.name
Promote relationship to intermediate node when:
- Relationship has >2 properties
- Relationship is the subject of another query
- Multiple entities share the same connection context
- You need to connect >2 entities in one fact
Relational → Graph Migration Table
| Relational construct | Graph equivalent | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Table row | Node | One label per table (add more as needed) |
| Column (scalar) | Node property | |
| Primary key | Uniqueness constraint property | Use tmdbId, not id (too generic) |
| Foreign key | Relationship | Direction: from dependent → referenced |
| Many-to-many junction table | Intermediate node | Especially if junction has own columns |
| Junction table (no own columns) | Direct relationship | Simpler; upgrade to intermediate node later |
| NULL FK (optional relation) | Absent relationship | No node created; absence is the signal |
| Polymorphic FK (Rails-style) | Multiple labels or relationship types | Split into type-specific rels |
| Self-referential FK | Same-label relationship | :Employee {managerId} → (e)-[:REPORTS_TO]->(m) |
| Audit/history columns | Intermediate versioning node | See References for versioning pattern |
Supernode Detection and Mitigation
Detect:
// Find top-10 highest-degree nodes
MATCH (n)
RETURN labels(n) AS labels, elementId(n) AS id, count{ (n)--() } AS degree
ORDER BY degree DESC LIMIT 10
Node with degree >> median for its label = supernode candidate. Any node with >100K relationships will degrade traversal queries that pass through it.
Causes:
- Domain supernodes: airports, celebrities, popular hashtags — unavoidable
- Modeling supernodes: gender, country, status modeled as nodes with millions of edges — avoidable
Mitigation strategies (in priority order):
| Strategy | When to use | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Query direction | Directional asymmetry exists | Query from low-degree side; exploit direction |
| Relationship type split | Supernode serves multiple roles | :FOLLOWS + :FAN instead of single :RELATED_TO |
| Label segregation | Supernode conflates entity types | :Celebrity vs :User → query only relevant subtype |
| Bucket pattern | Time-series or high-volume event nodes | See below |
| Avoid modeling | Low-cardinality categoricals | Use label instead of node (:Active not (:Status {name:"Active"})) |
| Join hint | Query tuning last resort | USING JOIN ON n in Cypher |
Bucket pattern (time-series / high-volume):
// Instead of: (:User)-[:VIEWED]->(:Page) (millions of rels per user)
// Bucket by hour:
(u:User)-[:VIEWED_IN]->(b:ViewBucket {userId: u.id, hour: '2025-04-28T14'})-[:VIEWED]->(p:Page)
// Query last hour's views without traversing full history:
MATCH (u:User {id: $uid})-[:VIEWED_IN]->(b:ViewBucket {hour: $hour})-[:VIEWED]->(p)
RETURN p.url
Naming Conventions
| Element | Convention | Good | Bad |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node label | PascalCase, singular noun | :Person, :BlogPost | :person, :blog_posts, :Entity |
| Relationship type | SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE, verb phrase | :ACTED_IN, :WORKS_FOR | :actedin, :relatedTo, :HAS |
| Property key | camelCase | firstName, createdAt | FirstName, first_name |
| Constraint name | snake_case descriptive | person_id_unique | constraint1 |
| Index name | snake_case descriptive | person_name_idx | index2 |
Schema Enforcement — What to Create for Each Element
Run all DDL with IF NOT EXISTS. Apply before importing data.
// 1. Uniqueness constraint — every node type used in MERGE
CREATE CONSTRAINT person_id_unique IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (p:Person) REQUIRE p.id IS UNIQUE;
// 2. Existence constraint (Enterprise) — mandatory properties
CREATE CONSTRAINT person_name_exists IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (p:Person) REQUIRE p.name IS NOT NULL;
// 3. Property type constraint (Enterprise) — enforce data type
CREATE CONSTRAINT person_born_integer IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (p:Person) REQUIRE p.born IS :: INTEGER;
// 4. Key constraint (Enterprise) — unique + exists in one
CREATE CONSTRAINT movie_tmdbid_key IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (m:Movie) REQUIRE m.tmdbId IS NODE KEY;
// 5. Range index — equality and range filters on properties
CREATE INDEX person_name_idx IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (p:Person) ON (p.name);
// 6. Fulltext index — CONTAINS, STARTS WITH, free text search
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX person_fulltext IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (n:Person) ON EACH [n.name, n.bio];
// 7. Vector index — embedding similarity search
CREATE VECTOR INDEX chunk_embedding_idx IF NOT EXISTS
FOR (c:Chunk) ON (c.embedding)
OPTIONS { indexConfig: { `vector.dimensions`: 1536, `vector.similarity_function`: 'cosine' } };
// 8. Relationship index — filter on rel properties
CREATE INDEX acted_in_year_idx IF NOT EXISTS
FOR ()-[r:ACTED_IN]-() ON (r.year);
After creating indexes, poll until ONLINE:
SHOW INDEXES YIELD name, state WHERE state <> 'ONLINE' RETURN name, state;
Do NOT use an index until state = ONLINE.
Vector / Embedding Property Modeling
Store embeddings on dedicated :Chunk nodes, never on business nodes:
(:Document)-[:HAS_CHUNK]->(c:Chunk {text: "...", embedding: [...]})
Rules:
- Chunk node:
text(source text),embedding(float array),chunkIndex(int) - Parent document: metadata only (title, url, createdAt)
- Vector index on
c.embeddingonly - Chunk size 200–500 tokens with 20% overlap is production default [field]
- Do NOT put embedding on
:Document— makes the node too large and pollutes traversal
Anti-Patterns Table
| Anti-pattern | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
Generic labels :Entity, :Node | No filtering benefit; all nodes scan | Use domain labels :Person, :Product |
Generic rel types :RELATED_TO, :HAS | Can't filter by relationship type | Use semantic types :PURCHASED, :AUTHORED |
| Low-cardinality value as node | Supernode (:Status {name:"active"} → millions of edges) | Use label :Active instead |
Property as label (n.type = 'VIP' + :VIP label both exist) | Inconsistency, duplication | Pick one; prefer label if used in traversal |
| Storing embeddings on business node | Node bloat, slow traversal | Dedicated :Chunk node |
| MERGE without uniqueness constraint | Duplicate nodes silently created | Add constraint before any MERGE |
| Missing relationship direction meaning | Arbitrary direction; confusing model | Direction = semantic flow of action |
| Junction table modeled as bare property | Loses history and extensibility | Intermediate node with its own properties |
id as property name | id(n) is a deprecated Cypher function (use elementId(n)); bare id is fine as a property name in practice, but domain-qualified names (personId, movieId) are clearer and avoid any future ambiguity | Prefer personId, movieId, tmdbId where it aids readability |
| All dates as strings | No range queries; no temporal operators | Use Neo4j date() or datetime() type |
Output Format — Schema Assessment
When reviewing an existing model:
## Schema Assessment
### Compliant
- [constraint / pattern that is correct]
### Issues Found
#### [Title] — Severity: ERROR / WARNING / INFO
- **Current**: what the model does
- **Problem**: why it is an issue
- **Fix**: specific Cypher DDL or model change
## Recommended Schema
### Node Labels
- :Label {key: TYPE, prop: TYPE, ...} → constraints: [list]
### Relationships
- (:LabelA)-[:TYPE {prop: TYPE}]->(:LabelB)
### Constraints to Create
[CREATE CONSTRAINT ... statements]
### Indexes to Create
[CREATE INDEX ... statements]
Severity semantics:
| Severity | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
ERROR | Model correctness failure (duplicates possible, data loss risk) | Stop; fix before proceeding |
WARNING | Performance or extensibility risk | Report; ask user before proceeding |
INFO | Style or convention deviation | Surface; continue |
Provenance Labels
[official]— stated directly in Neo4j docs[derived]— follows from documented behavior[field]— community heuristic; treat as default but validate
Checklist
- Use cases (≥5 queries) defined before modeling
- Schema inspected on existing database before changes proposed
- Every MERGE-target node label has a uniqueness constraint
- No generic labels (
:Entity,:Node,:Thing) - No generic relationship types (
:RELATED_TO,:HAS,:CONNECTED_TO) - Relationship direction encodes semantic meaning
- N-ary or propertied relationships use intermediate nodes
- High-cardinality values stored as properties, not nodes
- Low-cardinality categoricals used as labels, not property nodes
- Embeddings on dedicated
:Chunknodes, not business nodes - Supernode candidates identified and mitigated
- All DDL uses
IF NOT EXISTS - Indexes polled to ONLINE before use
- Assessment output follows the structured format above
- Every prohibition paired with a concrete fix
References
Load on demand:
- references/modeling-patterns.md — time-series, versioning, multi-tenancy, linked list, access control patterns
- Neo4j Data Modeling Guide
- Neo4j Modeling Tips
- GraphAcademy: Graph Data Modeling Fundamentals
- Super Nodes — All About Super Nodes (David Allen)