Briefs work
Use at start of any work session. Reads where you left off in CURRENT.md and executes the planned task — without relitigating decisions or declaring the task done.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add naxoc/claude-briefs --skill briefs-workAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.6 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Briefs: Work Session
Executor mode. CURRENT.md is the contract for this session: it says what to build, in what order, under which settled decisions. Your job is to work through it — not to redesign it.
Starting a Session
Step 1: Find the briefs folder. Check these in order:
- Read
.claude/briefs-pathfor a saved path - Check if
.briefs/exists in the project root - If neither works, ask the user for the path
If the folder has a PLAN.md but no BACKLOG.md, it predates the rename — treat
PLAN.md as BACKLOG.md and offer to mv it.
Step 2: Read CURRENT.md. If there's an active task, summarize it — including
the first unchecked item in # Task list and any recent # Log entries — and
ask: "Pick up where we left off, or start something new?"
If CURRENT.md is empty but queue/ has staged plans, offer to promote one:
move its content into CURRENT.md, delete the queue file, add the task to
BACKLOG.md's ## Up next if missing — then re-verify before executing:
- Check the plan's named files, functions, and patterns still exist as
described (the Approach header says which commit it was planned against —
git diff --stat <that-sha>..HEADshows what moved underneath it). - Superficial drift (file moved, rename, shifted line numbers): fix the
plan's references inline, note it in
# Log, proceed. - Structural drift (a pattern to mirror was refactored away, a settled
decision conflicts with current reality): stop and tell the user the plan
needs a
/briefs-planpass — do not improvise around a broken plan.
Step 3: Check the shape of the task:
- Approach is filled in → execute it (see below).
- No Approach and the task is non-trivial (multiple files, design choices,
unknowns) → recommend running
/briefs-planfirst, ideally on a stronger model. Planning done here, ad hoc, is how tasks go sideways. - No Approach but the task is small and obvious (typo-level, single-file, no decisions) → just do it; a plan would cost more than the work.
Executing
- Work the
# Task listin order. Follow the## Order of workgates — if a step says "make test green", it means green before moving on. - Settled decisions are settled. If
# Approachsays the status code is hardcoded, do not add a config option because it "seems better". If you believe a decision is actually wrong or impossible, stop and say so — with the evidence — instead of silently deviating. - When reality disagrees with the plan (a named file doesn't exist, a
pattern changed, an API behaves differently): make the smallest sensible
adaptation and record it in
# Log(see below). If the deviation would change something under## Decisions (settled), stop and ask instead. - Respect
## Hard rules for the implementing sessionabsolutely. - If the user asks for something outside the active task, add it to BACKLOG.md
(under
## Backlog) rather than expanding the session's scope — unless the user explicitly says to switch.
File rules — what this skill may and may not write
These rules exist because sessions used to declare work "done" before the user
ever reviewed or tested it. The boundary: you record progress; only the
user, via /briefs-done, records completion.
- CURRENT.md — keep it live during the session:
- Tick
# Task listcheckboxes when an item is implemented and verified (tests/checks pass). A ticked box means "built and checked", not "accepted" — acceptance happens in/briefs-doneafter the user reviews. - Append dated one-liners to
# Log: deviations from the Approach (with why), blockers hit, anything the next session must know to continue cold. When the user hands you a commit SHA for finished subtask work, record it here too ("backend committed as abc1234") and mention that/briefs-donecan checkpoint it into PROGRESS.md without closing the task. - Add reviewer-relevant facts to
# Review notesas you create them (surprising changes, migration notes, things to test manually). - Never reset CURRENT.md, remove the task, or write anything that
declares the task finished. Even with every box ticked, the task is
"awaiting review" — say exactly that, and point the user at
/briefs-done.
- Tick
- BACKLOG.md — may append newly discovered work to
## Backlog. Nothing else. - PROGRESS.md — never touch. Only
/briefs-donewrites there. - NOTES.md — may append reusable learnings (gotchas, commands, references).
Ending a session
Before stopping — whether finished or interrupted — make CURRENT.md reflect
reality: boxes ticked to match verified work, # Log updated with current
state and the concrete next step. A fresh session must be able to continue
from the file alone.
If all boxes are ticked: report what was built and how it was verified, then
hand off — "ready for your review; run /briefs-done when you've reviewed and
committed." Do not celebrate completion; that's the user's call.
Rules
- One task at a time. CURRENT.md holds exactly one active task. If you're
tempted to add a second, put it in BACKLOG.md instead.
## Up nextmust stay short (max 3 items) — if it has more, mention it and suggest/briefs-health. - Keep output concise. Report outcomes and load-bearing findings, not narration.
- Don't use numbered lists in the briefs files unless order truly matters — they make reordering painful.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.