Sdlc cross review
Review a document against its SDLC lifecycle context — assess completeness and check consistency with parent documents in the document hierarchy.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add nakane1chome/claude-skills --skill sdlc-cross-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.7 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review the target document(s) at $ARGUMENTS against its SDLC lifecycle context.
Stop after each stage and have changes reviewed with user.
Note: This skill checks a document's position and consistency within a project hierarchy — it does not polish the document itself. Stages 0-4 are analysis only — findings are presented for discussion, not applied as edits. The developer holds final authority on all judgment calls.
-
Read and identify context (developer confirms)
- Read the target document and its surrounding project structure
- What is this document about and where does it sit in the project?
- Can you identify a document hierarchy (V-model, or project-defined)?
- If the project defines its own hierarchy, use that; otherwise ask the developer to clarify
- Confirm understanding of the document's position before proceeding
-
Assess completeness (agent proposes, developer decides)
- Is this a skeleton that needs fleshing out, or a draft that needs polishing?
- Skeletons need generative work (structure, diagrams, missing sections) — that's a flesh-out task, not a cross-review
- Drafts with language issues need review-steps first
- If the document isn't ready for cross-review, recommend the appropriate skill and stop
- Ask: does the developer want to proceed with cross-review now, or address completeness first?
-
Review vs parent document (agent critiques, developer discusses)
- Identify the parent document(s) that constrain this document (left side, decomposition)
- Is the target document consistent with decisions and constraints in its parent(s)?
- Are there contradictions or gaps between the target and its parent documents?
- Does the target document trace back to requirements or decisions in the parent?
- Present findings and ask: are any inconsistencies intentional or reflect evolved thinking?
-
Cross-validate against the right side (agent critiques, developer discusses)
- Identify the validation pair for this document (see V-Model Context below)
- Do validation artifacts exist that cover what the document specifies?
- Is anything specified in the document that has no corresponding validation?
- Is anything validated that isn't specified in the document?
- Ask: are missing validation artifacts a known gap, or an oversight?
-
Summary and recommendations (agent leads)
- What is the document's overall consistency with its hierarchy?
- What are the top issues to address?
- Recommendation: consistent / minor gaps / needs rework
Pipeline Position
This skill sits outside the main pipeline (flesh-out -> review-steps -> strong-edit -> agent-optimize). It's a lateral check — validating a document against its project context, not polishing the document itself. Run it when a document is mature enough to check against its hierarchy.
When to Use This vs Other Skills
| Goal | Use |
|---|---|
| Raw notes need structure and expansion | flesh-out |
| Draft needs polish and consistency | review-steps |
| Complete draft needs critical evaluation | strong-edit |
| Check document against its SDLC hierarchy | sdlc-cross-review |
| Finalized document needs agent-friendly restructuring | agent-optimize |
V-Model Context
The V-model pairs each definition stage with a corresponding testing stage. The left side decomposes requirements; the right side validates them. Each level on the right validates the corresponding level on the left.
Requirements Analysis ◄──────────────────► Acceptance Testing
│ ▲
│ constrains │ validates
▼ │
System Design ◄────────────────────────────► System Testing
│ ▲
│ constrains │ validates
▼ │
Architecture Design ◄──────────────────────► Integration Testing
│ ▲
│ constrains │ validates
▼ │
Module Design ◄────────────────────────────► Unit Testing
│ ▲
│ constrains │ validates
▼ │
Implementation
Standard Cross-Validation Pairs
| Left Side (Definition) | Right Side (Validation) |
|---|---|
| Requirements analysis | Acceptance testing |
| System design | System testing |
| Architecture design | Integration testing |
| Module design | Unit testing |
Not every project will use all levels. Identify which levels the project uses and apply the relevant checks.
References
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.