Validate
Skill myclaude-sh/myclaude-creator-engine/.claude/skills/validate
The creation pipeline for Claude Code products — research, create, validate, publish. 13 types, 20 quality patterns, zero coding required.
npx -y skills add myclaude-sh/myclaude-creator-engine --skill validateAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 24 stars24 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Run MCS quality validation on products in workspace/. Three-tier system: MCS-1 structure, MCS-2 quality + anti-commodity, MCS-3 deep review. Returns scored reports with fix instructions. Use when: 'validate', 'check quality', or before publishing.
SKILL.md
16.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Validator
Run MCS quality checks on any product in workspace/ and return actionable, scored reports.
When to use: After building or modifying a product, before publishing, or anytime you want a quality snapshot.
When NOT to use: On products outside workspace/. Do not use to validate the Engine itself.
Activation Protocol
- Shared preamble: Load
references/quality/activation-preamble.md— context assembly, persona adaptation, deterministic routing rules. - Detect product type: read
.meta.yaml→product.typeandstate.phase- Missing → infer from file structure (SKILL.md, AGENT.md, SQUAD.md, hooks.json, etc.)
- Cannot determine → ask: "What product type is this?"
1b. Mode selection (Express vs Guided). Read
creator.yaml → preferences.workflow_style. Resolve the flow mode: --expressflag ORworkflow_style == "autonomous"→ Express mode. Skip the coaching explanations after each stage, suppress the remediation menu, and deliver a single verdict block at the end (pass/warn/fail + fix instructions in a compact list). Persona tone still holds; only the conversational scaffolding is trimmed.workflow_style == "guided"or missing → Guided mode (default). Walk each stage with the full coaching voice and propose remediation interactively after failing stages.
- Maintain creator persona: Read
creator.yaml→ adapt toprofile.typeandtechnical_level - Load voice identity: Load
references/quality/engine-voice-core.md. Load the fullreferences/quality/engine-voice.mdonly for peak moments (first-pass milestone celebration, confronting failure verdict) — see UX Stack below. 3b. Exemplar load: Loadreferences/quality/exemplar-outputs.mdsections E6 and E7 only — the validation pass and failure exemplars. Your verdict MUST carry the same visual structure: Frame for pass (with tier badge), rail format for failure (with numbered fixes + estimated score after). Adapt to creator context — never copy verbatim. - Load DNA requirements:
product-dna/{type}.yaml4b. Load architectural DNA: Readstructural-dna.md. The 10 architectural principles and the Tier 1 DNA patterns (D1-D4, D13, D14) are the canonical audit baseline — Stages 3 and 5 grep the product against them, and any violation surfaces as coaching. - Load product spec:
references/product-specs/{type}-spec.md5b. Load entity ontology (squad/system/agent/workflow/minds): If type ∈ {squad, system, agent, minds, workflow}, readreferences/entity-ontology.md. This substrate drives semantic validation:- §HERITAGE: verify the product inherits correct DNA from its lineage (squad must pass all agent DNA + D9/D10/D12/D18)
- §COMPOSITION: verify only allowed compositions (squad→agents+minds+skills+workflows; system→everything; workflow→skills only)
- §AGENT_ROLES: if
.meta.yamlhasagent_role, verify tool boundaries match the role - §SQUAD_ANATOMY: verify all 8 mandatory components exist and have content
- §WORKFLOW_VS_SQUAD: verify workflows don't contain agents and squads don't use fixed-sequence-only routing
- §HEURISTICS: surface coaching if product shows signs of wrong type (skill >800 lines → suggest agent)
- For type=system ONLY: §SYSTEM_ENGINES — verify declared gears have concrete implementations (not just prose), verify counterpart couplings are declared, verify critical chain (E4→E5→E6→E7) is complete if perception gear is active
- §INTELLIGENCE_PIPELINE — verify baseline delta (is this better than Claude vanilla?), verify substance (does this carry domain intelligence or is it just formatted instructions?)
- Load config:
config.yaml→ scoring weights, thresholds, placeholder patterns - Load gates:
quality-gates.yaml→ state transition rules 7b. Load proactives: Loadreferences/engine-proactive.md— wire #1 (pipeline guidance: after validate passes, guide to /test then /package), #19 (error recovery: on validation failure, propose specific fixes), #20 (test mandate: if MCS-2+ and not tested, block /package suggestion). - CLI contract: Load
references/cli-contract.mdfor Stage 6 (CLI Preflight). Severity map:- Warning:
validate --json— CLI validation is advisory during /validate (blocking only during /publish) - Warning:
doctor --json— health check is advisory, score < 8.0 triggers suggestion - Stage 6 detail protocol:
references/validation-stages/stage-6-cli-preflight.md
- Warning:
Commands
/validate → Auto-detect, run MCS-1
/validate --level=2 → MCS-2 (includes MCS-1)
/validate --level=3 → MCS-3 (includes MCS-1+2, PRO only)
/validate --fix → MCS-1 + auto-remediate fixable issues
/validate --report → MCS-1 + output detailed report file
/validate --batch → Validate ALL products sequentially
Core Instructions
STAGE EXECUTION
Execute stages in order. Blocking stages stop on failure. Non-blocking stages report but continue.
Load detailed stage protocols from references/ on demand. Each stage is a separate file — load only the stage(s) you need for the current --level.
| Stage | Name | Blocking | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Intent Coherence (W3.7) | advisory | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-0-intent-coherence.md |
| 1 | Structural | YES | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-1-structural.md |
| 2 | Integrity | YES | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-2-integrity.md |
| 3 | DNA Tier 1 | YES (MCS-1) | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-3-dna-tier1.md |
| 4 | DNA Tier 2 | no (MCS-2) | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-4-dna-tier2.md |
| 5 | DNA Tier 3 | no (MCS-3, PRO) | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-5-dna-tier3.md |
| 6 | CLI Preflight + 6b Health | YES (6) / advisory (6b) | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-6-cli-preflight.md |
| 7 | Anti-Commodity (+ 7b/7c/7d) | no (MCS-2+) | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-7-anti-commodity.md |
| 8 | Value Intelligence | no (MCS-2+) | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/value-intelligence.md (legacy) OR ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-8-value-intelligence.md (new) |
| 9 | Voice Coherence | advisory | Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/stage-9-voice-coherence.md |
Stage 0 runs first when .meta.yaml contains an intent_declaration block. It is advisory — surfaces coherence drift as coaching, never blocks. Skips silently for legacy products that lack the declaration, with a one-line advisory note.
Stage 0 failure behavior: If Stage 0 checks detect errors (enum_membership, type_legality, codex_consistency), they are reported as coaching items in the verdict — they appear in the output but do NOT affect the overall score or the pass/fail verdict. Stage 0 results are written to .meta.yaml → stage_0_results for downstream consumers but never prevent progression to Stage 1.
Stage 7 sub-stages (7b cognitive fidelity, 7c baseline delta, 7d composition check) are inside the stage 7 file — they only fire under their prerequisites and never need a separate load.
Index: ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-stages/_index.md lists all stages with file paths and routing rules.
Stage routing by level:
--level=1(MCS-1): Stages 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9--level=2(MCS-2): Stages 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (squad only), 6, 7, 7b-7d, 8, 9--level=3(MCS-3): Stages 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7b-7d, 8, 9
Squad-specific validation (applies at MCS-2+):
When product.type == "squad", the following additional checks run regardless of edition:
- Stage 5 DNA Tier 3 patterns D9, D10, D18 are MANDATORY at MCS-2 for squads (not PRO-gated). These are the coordination DNA — without them, a squad is just agents in a folder.
- D9 (Orchestrate Don't Execute): Verify orchestrator agent's
allowed-toolsincludes Agent but excludes Write/Edit/NotebookEdit. Orchestrator routes, never executes. - D10 (Handoff Specification): Verify
config/handoff-protocol.mdexists and contains a handoff envelope format (structured fields: from, to, task, state, constraints). - D18 (Subagent Isolation): Verify each agent in
agents/*.mdis a distinct file with its own identity. No agent definition is inlined in SQUAD.md.
- D9 (Orchestrate Don't Execute): Verify orchestrator agent's
- Per-agent validation: Iterate every
agents/*.mdfile and verify individually:- D1: Has activation protocol or identity section
- D2: Has anti-patterns section with ≥3 items
- D4: Has quality gate with ≥2 verifiable criteria
- D14: Has when-not-to-use or degradation section
- Routing completeness: Verify
config/routing-table.mdcovers all agents listed in SQUAD.md roster. Every agent in roster must appear in at least one routing rule. - Task registry coherence: If
tasks/task-registry.yamlexists, verify each task references an agent that exists inagents/. - Chain registry coherence: If
chains/chain-registry.yamlexists, verify each chain references only agents that exist inagents/. - Heritage coherence (entity-ontology.md §HERITAGE): Verify squad inherits DNA from agent lineage — each specialist agent in
agents/*.mdmust independently pass agent-level DNA (D1, D2, D4, D6, D8, D11, D14, D15). The family-skill inheritance chain enforced at validation time. - Composition coherence (entity-ontology.md §COMPOSITION): Verify squad only composes allowed entities: agents(2+), minds(0+), skills(0+), workflows(0+). If squad references hooks or claude-md fragments, flag coaching: "Squads don't contain hooks or claude-md directly — that's system-level. Consider promoting to system."
- Role coherence (entity-ontology.md §AGENT_ROLES): If
tasks/task-registry.yamlexists, verify each task'sassigned_agenthas a ROLE consistent with the task type:- Write/create tasks → assigned to EXECUTOR or TRANSFORMER agents
- Analyze/report tasks → assigned to SPECIALIST or VALIDATOR agents
- Route/coordinate tasks → assigned to ORCHESTRATOR or ROUTER agents
- Advise/reason tasks → assigned to ADVISOR agents Mismatch is coaching (not blocking): "Task '{task_id}' is a write task assigned to {agent} which has SPECIALIST role (read-only). Consider reassigning."
- Anatomy completeness (entity-ontology.md §SQUAD_ANATOMY): Verify all 8 squad anatomy components have content beyond WHY comments:
- agents/ has ≥2 files with substantive content
- config/routing-table.md has routing rules (not just placeholder)
- config/handoff-protocol.md has envelope format defined
- workflows/ has ≥1 workflow with steps
- skills/ directory exists (advisory — some squads don't need shared skills)
- SQUAD.md has quality/checklist section with ≥2 items
- kernel/ has output format standards
- SQUAD.md has escalation section with confidence thresholds Missing anatomy = coaching warning with specific fix instruction.
- Type fitness heuristic (entity-ontology.md §HEURISTICS): Apply promotion/demotion checks:
- Squad with only 1 specialist agent → "This squad has only 1 specialist. Consider demoting to agent."
- Agent primary file >800 lines → "This agent has {N} lines. Consider splitting into a squad."
- Workflow with LLM-judgment routing → "This workflow has contextual routing. Consider promoting to squad."
- Agent role-tool coherence (entity-ontology.md §AGENT_ROLES): For each agent, if
.meta.yaml → agent_roleis populated:- EXECUTOR: must NOT deny Write/Edit/Bash
- SPECIALIST/VALIDATOR: should deny Write/Edit/Bash (read-only)
- ORCHESTRATOR: must have Agent tool, must deny Write/Edit/NotebookEdit
- ADVISOR: must deny Write/Edit/Bash/NotebookEdit Mismatch → coaching: "Agent role is {role} but tool boundary doesn't match. Expected: {expected}."
Stage 9 (Voice Coherence) is the last stage at every level. Advisory — never blocks publish. Stage 9 audits the product against the myClaude voice contract (P10 Touch Integrity anchor).
UX STACK (load before rendering output)
references/ux-experience-system.md§1 Context Assembly + §2.3 Moment Awareness (pass vs fail) + §3.3 Score Trajectoryreferences/ux-vocabulary.md— translate tiers and termsreferences/quality/engine-voice.md— Brand DNA + sfumato constraints
Cognitive rendering: /validate output adapts to creator journey. First validation pass = milestone moment (§4.1). Nth pass at 100% = skip celebration, surface next challenge ("Quality mastered. Distribution next?"). Failure = direct, prioritized, no sugar-coating. Score trajectory = show only when 2+ data points tell a meaningful story. Expert creators get technical details. Beginners get human explanation of what the score means.
SCORING & OUTPUT
Vocabulary rule: All creator-facing output uses ux-vocabulary.md tier names (Verified / Premium / Elite) instead of MCS-1/2/3. Stage names (Stage 0-9) are internal — creator sees "structure check", "content depth check", "expertise check", etc. DNA pattern IDs (D1-D20) never appear in creator output — describe the issue in plain language. Exception: developer/hybrid creators with technical_level=expert MAY see MCS-N labels with the vocabulary translation in parentheses.
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/validation-scoring.md for:
- Hard veto rules (pre-scoring)
- Scoring formula:
OVERALL = (DNA×0.50) + (STRUCTURAL×0.30) + (INTEGRITY×0.20) - Verdict logic (READY / NEEDS WORK / NOT READY)
- Output format template
- Token budget report
- Guided iteration (draft fixes for failures)
- Auto-fix rules (--fix flag)
- Batch validation (--batch)
- Publish pre-flight
- Persona-aware rendering
- State update templates (.meta.yaml + STATE.yaml)
Quality Gate
The Validator skill itself passes if:
- It correctly identifies product type from
.meta.yamlor file structure - It runs all checks appropriate for the requested MCS level
- Every failed check includes a specific, actionable fix instruction
- Score calculation matches formula:
passed / total × 100 .meta.yamlis updated after every validation run--fixnever modifies content that the creator wrote
Anti-Patterns
- Validating without reading product-dna — Always load type-specific DNA before checking patterns
- Skipping blocking stages — Stage 1-2 must pass before Stage 3+
- Generic fix instructions — Every failure needs a specific, actionable fix
- Modifying creator content in --fix — Only structural/formatting fixes
- Running Stage 8 for MCS-1 — Value intelligence adds noise at MCS-1, skip it
- Blocking cascade hiding downstream issues — When Stage 1-2 fails, downstream stages don't run. But the creator loses visibility into DNA/content issues that exist independently. After blocking failure, emit an advisory note: "Structural issues block full validation. After fixing these, re-run to see content-level results." Never silently hide what wasn't checked.
Compact Instructions
When context is compressed, preserve:
- Product slug, type, and current MCS level being validated
- Stage progress (which stages passed/failed)
- Overall score and verdict (READY/NEEDS WORK/NOT READY)
- Top 3 failures with fix instructions
- Value intelligence score if Stage 8 ran
- Whether --fix or --batch mode is active
- UX rule: Celebrate work not person. Show score trajectory if 2+ data points. Use ux-vocabulary.md tiers (Verified/Premium/Elite not MCS-1/2/3) in user-facing output.