agentsclimarketplace

Search first

Skill mturac/everything-openai-codex/skills/search-first

EOC: open-source operating system for OpenAI Codex workflows with agents, skills, hooks, rules, memory, safety gates, and cross-harness adapters.

Install
npx -y skills add mturac/everything-openai-codex --skill search-first

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Research-before-coding workflow. Search for existing tools, libraries, and patterns before writing custom code. Invokes the researcher agent.

SKILL.md

7.8 KB, ~1.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

/search-first — Research Before You Code

Systematizes the "search for existing solutions before implementing" workflow.

Trigger

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new feature that likely has existing solutions
  • Adding a dependency or integration
  • The user asks "add X functionality" and you're about to write code
  • Before creating a new utility, helper, or abstraction

Workflow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  0. TOOL AVAILABILITY PREFLIGHT             │
│     Check search channels before relying on │
│     them; report skipped channels honestly   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  1. NEED ANALYSIS                           │
│     Define what functionality is needed      │
│     Identify language/framework constraints  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. PARALLEL SEARCH (researcher agent)      │
│     ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐  │
│     │  npm /   │ │  MCP /   │ │  GitHub / │  │
│     │  PyPI    │ │  Skills  │ │  Web      │  │
│     └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. EVALUATE                                │
│     Score candidates (functionality, maint, │
│     community, docs, license, deps)         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. DECIDE                                  │
│     ┌─────────┐  ┌──────────┐  ┌─────────┐  │
│     │  Adopt  │  │  Extend  │  │  Build   │  │
│     │ as-is   │  │  /Wrap   │  │  Custom  │  │
│     └─────────┘  └──────────┘  └─────────┘  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. IMPLEMENT                               │
│     Install package / Configure MCP /       │
│     Write minimal custom code               │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Decision Matrix

SignalAction
Exact match, well-maintained, MIT/ApacheAdopt — install and use directly
Partial match, good foundationExtend — install + write thin wrapper
Multiple weak matchesCompose — combine 2-3 small packages
Nothing suitable foundBuild — write custom, but informed by research

How to Use

Step 0: Tool Availability Preflight

This is agent guidance, not an executable setup script. Check only the channels that are relevant to the task and project in front of you.

ChannelCheckIf missing
Repository searchrg --files and targeted rg queriesState that only visible files were inspected
Package registrynpm --version, python -m pip --version, or project package managerUse web/docs search and avoid claiming registry coverage
GitHub CLIgh auth statusUse public web or local git history only
MCP/docs toolsAvailable tool list or local MCP configFall back to official docs/web search
Skills directoryls ~/.codex/skills ~/.codex/skills where applicableSay no local skill catalog was available

Quick Mode (inline)

Before writing a utility or adding functionality, mentally run through:

  1. Does this already exist in the repo? → rg through relevant modules/tests first
  2. Is this a common problem? → Search npm/PyPI
  3. Is there an MCP for this? → Check ~/.codex/settings.json and search
  4. Is there a skill for this? → Check ~/.codex/skills/
  5. Is there a GitHub implementation/template? → Run GitHub code search for maintained OSS before writing net-new code

Full Mode (agent)

For non-trivial functionality, launch the researcher agent:

Agent(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="
  Research existing tools for: [DESCRIPTION]
  Language/framework: [LANG]
  Constraints: [ANY]

  Search: npm/PyPI, MCP servers, OpenAI Codex skills, GitHub
  Return: Structured comparison with recommendation
")

Older OpenAI Codex docs may call this Task(...); use the current agent/subagent tool name exposed by the active harness.

Search Shortcuts by Category

Development Tooling

  • Linting → eslint, ruff, textlint, markdownlint
  • Formatting → prettier, black, gofmt
  • Testing → jest, pytest, go test
  • Pre-commit → husky, lint-staged, pre-commit

AI/LLM Integration

  • Codex SDK → Context7 for latest docs
  • Prompt management → Check MCP servers
  • Document processing → unstructured, pdfplumber, mammoth

Data & APIs

  • HTTP clients → httpx (Python), ky/undici (Node)
  • Validation → zod (TS), pydantic (Python)
  • Database → Check for MCP servers first

Content & Publishing

  • Markdown processing → remark, unified, markdown-it
  • Image optimization → sharp, imagemin

Integration Points

With planner agent

The planner should invoke researcher before Phase 1 (Architecture Review):

  • Researcher identifies available tools
  • Planner incorporates them into the implementation plan
  • Avoids "reinventing the wheel" in the plan

With architect agent

The architect should consult researcher for:

  • Technology stack decisions
  • Integration pattern discovery
  • Existing reference architectures

With iterative-retrieval skill

Combine for progressive discovery:

  • Cycle 1: Broad search (npm, PyPI, MCP)
  • Cycle 2: Evaluate top candidates in detail
  • Cycle 3: Test compatibility with project constraints

Examples

Example 1: "Add dead link checking"

Need: Check markdown files for broken links
Search: npm "markdown dead link checker"
Found: textlint-rule-no-dead-link (score: 9/10)
Action: ADOPT — npm install textlint-rule-no-dead-link
Result: Zero custom code, battle-tested solution

Example 2: "Add HTTP client wrapper"

Need: Resilient HTTP client with retries and timeout handling
Search: npm "http client retry", PyPI "httpx retry"
Found: got (Node) with retry plugin, httpx (Python) with built-in retry
Action: ADOPT — use got/httpx directly with retry config
Result: Zero custom code, production-proven libraries

Example 3: "Add config file linter"

Need: Validate project config files against a schema
Search: npm "config linter schema", "json schema validator cli"
Found: ajv-cli (score: 8/10)
Action: ADOPT + EXTEND — install ajv-cli, write project-specific schema
Result: 1 package + 1 schema file, no custom validation logic

Anti-Patterns

  • Jumping to code: Writing a utility without checking if one exists
  • Ignoring MCP: Not checking if an MCP server already provides the capability
  • Silent skipping: Reporting "nothing found" when a search channel was unavailable
  • Over-customizing: Wrapping a library so heavily it loses its benefits
  • Dependency bloat: Installing a massive package for one small feature

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,132. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.