Post ticket summary
Collection of Claude Code and Claude Desktop skills for developer workflows, automation, and productivity
npx -y skills add mostafa-drz/claude-skills --skill post-ticket-summaryAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Posts a structured implementation summary comment to a Linear issue — what was built, key decisions, reuse patterns, and how to test. Use after completing work on a ticket to document the implementation for the team.
SKILL.md
5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Post Ticket Summary
Add a structured implementation summary comment to a Linear issue after completing work.
Preferences
Read ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md using the Read tool. If not found, no preferences are set.
Context
On startup, use Bash to detect: current git branch, recent commits (git log --oneline -20), and repo name (gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner). Skip any that fail.
Command routing
Check $ARGUMENTS:
help→ display help then stopconfig→ interactive setup then stopreset→ delete~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md, confirm, stop--preview <issue-id>→ show comment without posting then stop--minimal <issue-id>→ use minimal template- anything else → post summary
Help
Post Summary — Document implementation on a Linear issue
Usage:
/post-ticket-summary <issue-id> Post full summary
/post-ticket-summary --preview <issue-id> Show without posting
/post-ticket-summary --minimal <issue-id> Short summary (skip architecture/reuse)
/post-ticket-summary config Set template preferences
/post-ticket-summary reset Clear preferences
/post-ticket-summary help This help
Examples:
/post-ticket-summary AIS-810
/post-ticket-summary --preview AIS-810
/post-ticket-summary --minimal AIS-810
What it does:
1. Reads the Linear issue and codebase
2. Analyzes recent commits and changed files
3. Builds structured summary comment
4. Posts to the Linear issue
Current preferences:
(shown above under Preferences)
Config
Use AskUserQuestion:
Q1 — "Default template?" (full (default), minimal) Q2 — "Which sections to include?" (multiSelect: true)
- Implementation summary
- Key decisions / architecture
- What was reused
- How to test
- Notes
Q3 — "Auto-detect issue from branch?" (Yes (default), No — always ask)
Save to ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md.
First-time detection
If no preferences file exists, show:
"First time using /post-ticket-summary? Run /post-ticket-summary config to customize template sections, or continue with full template."
Then proceed.
Steps
1. Resolve issue
- If issue ID provided in
$ARGUMENTS, use it - If no ID and auto-detect is on, extract from branch name (pattern:
user/ais-NNN-*) - If still no ID, ask via
AskUserQuestion
Fetch the issue: title, description, project, status.
2. Check for existing summary
Fetch comments on the issue. If an implementation summary comment already exists, ask: "An implementation summary already exists. Replace it, or skip?"
3. Gather implementation details
From the codebase:
- Recent commits on current branch (pre-injected)
- Key files changed:
git diff main...HEAD --stat(or appropriate base) - Read the main changed files to understand what was built
From project context:
- CLAUDE.md for conventions
- README.md for project overview
Ask user (optional — use AskUserQuestion with all optional):
- Loom URL or recording link (or placeholder)
- Live/staging URL for testing
- Any additional context worth documenting
If user says "skip", use placeholders.
4. Build comment
Full template:
## Implementation Summary
{1-2 paragraphs: what was built and the product goal. Focus on business value.}
### What Was Reused
| Component | Source | Adaptation |
|-----------|--------|------------|
| {component} | {origin} | {what changed} |
---
## How to Test
**Branch:** `{branch}`
**Live URL:** {url or N/A}
### Steps
1. {step}
2. {step}
3. {step}
---
## Features
### 1. {Feature Name}
{2-3 sentences from user perspective. What they see, what they can do, business value.}
### 2. {Feature Name}
{Same structure}
---
## Key Decisions
| Decision | Rationale |
|----------|-----------|
| {decision} | {why} |
---
## Notes
- {Additional context}
Minimal template:
## Implementation Summary
{1-2 paragraphs}
## How to Test
**Branch:** `{branch}`
1. {step}
2. {step}
## Notes
- {anything important}
Apply section toggles from preferences.
Content guidelines
- Summary: Lead with the problem, then what the implementation does.
- Features: User perspective — what they see and do. No file paths.
- Key Decisions: Focus on the "why" behind non-obvious choices.
- Reuse: Show what was leveraged vs built new.
5. Post or preview
If --preview: display the comment and stop.
Otherwise: post via create_comment.
6. Report
Posted implementation summary to {issue-id}.
Sections: {list of included sections}
Next steps:
1. Record Loom and update the link
2. Add screenshots if relevant
3. Replace any [PLACEHOLDER] markers
7. Learn
If user removes sections consistently, update preferences. If user adds custom sections, note the pattern.