Channel competitor analysis
Skill moses607/socialforge/skills/channel-competitor-analysis
Reverse-engineer any creator, channel, profile, or single viral post to extract the hooks, formats, content pillars, posting cadence, engagement patterns, and exploitable weaknesses behind their growth. Use when the user wants to analyze a competitor/account/video, understand why something went viral, find gaps to attack, or model a winning channel. Trigger on "analyze this profile/channel/video", competitor research, or "why did this blow up". Works with any capable model.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add moses607/socialforge --skill channel-competitor-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.5 KB, 732 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Channel & Competitor Analysis
Growth leaves fingerprints. Every channel that works is running a repeatable system — a few pillars, a hook style, a format, a cadence — and you can read it off their public output. The goal is not to copy; it's to find the pattern they're exploiting and the gap they're leaving open for you.
Inputs
Ask for (or work with what's given): the profile/handle, 5-20 of their recent posts (ideally their top performers), and follower/engagement numbers if available. If you only have a URL, work from titles, hooks, thumbnails, and visible metrics.
Method
- Separate outliers from baseline. Rank their posts by engagement relative to their own average. The 2-3× outliers are the signal — that's what the audience actually wants. The baseline is filler.
- Decode the outliers on five axes:
- Hook — the opening move and archetype (see
hook-machine). - Format — talking-head, listicle, story, tutorial, reaction, B-roll+VO.
- Pillar — the recurring topic/theme it belongs to.
- Emotion — what it makes the viewer feel (status, fear, curiosity, belonging, aspiration).
- Structure — hook → escalation → payoff → CTA; where retention is engineered.
- Hook — the opening move and archetype (see
- Map the pillars. Cluster all posts into 3-5 content pillars; note the % of output and % of total engagement per pillar. The high-engagement/low-output pillar is an underexploited vein.
- Read the cadence & funnel. Posting frequency, best-performing times, and how they convert attention (link in bio, series, lead magnet, product).
- Find the weaknesses (your opening). Where are they weak or absent? Common gaps: no strong hooks, no series/retention loop, ignoring a platform, weak CTA, a pillar their audience loves but they underserve, poor production, or a tone that alienates a sub-segment.
Output template
## Analysis: <channel/creator>
Baseline vs outliers: avg engagement <x>; outliers <list top 3 + their multiple>
### What's working (their winning system)
Pillars (share of output / share of engagement): <table>
Hook style: <..> | Dominant format: <..> | Core emotion: <..>
Cadence & best times: <..> | Conversion path: <..>
### Why the outliers hit
<per top post: hook + structure + emotion, 1-2 lines each>
### Their weaknesses = your openings
<3-5 specific, exploitable gaps>
### Attack plan for you
<3 concrete content moves that use their gap + your edge>
Rules
- Analyze outliers, not averages — the average post tells you what didn't work.
- Model the system, don't clone the posts. Copying a viral video a week late loses; stealing its mechanism wins.
- Always end with an attack plan — analysis without an action is trivia.
- Separate "what they do" from "what actually drives their engagement" — creators are often wrong about their own hits.
- Note production floor: if their weakness is low effort, your opening is craft; if it's craft, your opening is speed/volume or a sharper niche.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.