agentsclimarketplace

Skill health lens

Skill ModelBound/modelbound-cursor-plugin/skills/skill-health-lens

Audit Agent Skills (SKILL.md files) for trust score, token budget, duplicate content, and risky tool surface. Use when reviewing a SKILL.md, before publishing a skill, or when an agent's skill library starts to feel bloated or untrustworthy. Invoke with "/skill-health-lens" or ask the agent to "lens this skill".From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ModelBound/modelbound-cursor-plugin --skill skill-health-lens

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

4.8 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Skill Health Lens

Audits Agent Skills against the same checks ModelBound runs in its Skill Development Pipeline — Trust, Token Budget, Duplicates, and Tool Surface — without running the full pipeline.

When to use

  • Reviewing or editing any SKILL.md file
  • Before publishing a skill to a team marketplace or Cursor Marketplace
  • When an agent's skill library has grown past ~10 skills
  • When a skill keeps misfiring or being ignored by the agent

What to check

For each SKILL.md in scope:

1. Trust score (target: ≥ 70)

Score the skill 0–100 using ModelBound's @modelbound/skill-trust heuristics:

  • Frontmatter completenessname, description, optional allowed_tools present and well-formed
  • Description quality — has a clear "when to use" signal, is between 30 and 400 chars, names concrete triggers
  • Instruction shape — uses numbered steps or bullets, no walls of prose, no contradictory rules
  • Determinism — avoids vague language ("maybe", "consider", "could") in favor of imperatives
  • Provenance — links to source docs or examples where claims are made

Report trust tier:

  • Green ≥ 80
  • Amber 60–79
  • Red < 60

2. Token budget

Estimate tokens (chars / 4) for the skill body and compare against ModelBound's thresholds:

  • Green ≤ 2,000 tokens
  • Amber 2,000–5,000 tokens
  • Red > 5,000 tokens

Flag the top 3 most token-heavy sections and suggest where to split into sub-skills or move into a referenced doc.

3. Duplicate content

For each skill, compare with every other SKILL.md in the workspace using a Jaccard similarity over normalized tokens. Flag pairs with similarity ≥ 0.4 as likely duplicates and ≥ 0.6 as near-clones. Suggest a merge or rename.

4. Tool surface audit

Parse the allowed_tools frontmatter (and any explicit tool mentions in the body). Flag:

  • Skills with no allowed_tools field (implicit unrestricted access)
  • Skills granting access to destructive tools (run_terminal, delete_file, write_file on broad globs)
  • Skills mixing read-only research with mutating actions (split recommendation)

How to run

  1. Glob **/SKILL.md from the workspace root (or operate on the currently open file).
  2. For each file, compute the four sections above.
  3. Produce a single Markdown report grouped by skill, then a workspace-level summary table.
  4. End with 3 prioritized fixes the user can apply now (concrete, copy-paste-ready edits).

ModelBound integration

When the user is signed in to ModelBound (via the modelbound MCP server defined in this plugin), also:

  • Call skills.list (optionally filtered by category or group_id) and skills.listGroups to pull the user's Skills — including a whole group at once when they say things like "lens my Onboarding group" or "audit every Backend skill".
  • Use skills.get / skills.getFile for the full bundle, and platform.exportSkillForIde with group_id to bundle every skill in a group into the IDE in one shot.
  • Offer to request an AI review for any skill scoring Red on Trust.
  • Surface team-level policies (banned tools, required sections) so they're checked alongside the four core checks.

Note: ModelBound no longer uses the legacy "pack" concept — everything is a Skill, optionally organized into a Skill group. Older packs.* / export_pack_for_ide tool names still work as deprecated aliases but new code should use skills.* and platform.exportSkillForIde.

If the MCP server is unreachable or the user is not signed in, the four core checks still run locally.

Output format

# Skill Health Lens — <N> skills in <workspace>

## Summary
| Skill | Trust | Tokens | Duplicates | Tools |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| code-reviewer | 🟢 86 | 🟢 1.2k | — | ✅ scoped |
| pr-helper    | 🟡 71 | 🔴 6.8k | clones code-reviewer (0.62) | ⚠️ unrestricted |

## Top 3 fixes
1. **pr-helper**: split into `pr-summarize` and `pr-review` (current body is 6.8k tokens).
2. **pr-helper**: add `allowed_tools: [read_file, grep]` to drop the unrestricted warning.
3. **pr-helper** ↔ **code-reviewer**: 62% overlap — consider merging or extracting a shared rule.

## Details
...

Out of scope

  • Editing skills automatically — the agent surfaces fixes, the user applies them
  • Replacing the ModelBound Skill Development Pipeline — this is the local "Test & Optimize" lens only
  • Running scoring inside the agent loop on every keystroke — invoke on demand

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,401. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.