agentsclimarketplace

Ki stack verify

Skill Milind220/Ki-Stack/skills/ki-stack/ki-stack-verify

Deep KiCad skills for coding agents

Install
npx -y skills add Milind220/Ki-Stack --skill ki-stack-verify

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Verify KiCad changes with render-after-edit workflows, DRC/ERC, and evidence-first reporting. Use when a change has been made and the agent needs to prove the result instead of merely describing it.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

4.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

ki-stack-verify

Purpose

This skill teaches the agent how to prove that a KiCad change actually worked.

It is the canonical ki-stack skill for:

  • render-after-edit verification
  • PCB DRC
  • schematic ERC when relevant
  • export/check loops
  • evidence-first reporting

When to use it

Use this skill after:

  • a live IPC edit
  • an offline kiutils-rs transform
  • a manual KiCad file change that needs proof
  • any task where visual and structural correctness matters

Shared assumptions

  • A change is not done until there is evidence.
  • Prefer deterministic exports over subjective descriptions.
  • Prefer CLI checks when available.
  • Report exact outputs, not just impressions.

Phase 1: Orient

  1. Determine the artifact type that changed:
  • board
  • schematic
  • symbol
  • footprint
  • project metadata only
  1. Confirm KiCad CLI availability:

    skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-cli-path
    skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-version
    
  2. Decide which evidence applies:

  • visual render
  • DRC
  • ERC
  • file re-inspection
  • a combination of the above

Phase 2: Render evidence

If the change affects anything visual, render it.

Examples:

Board before/after

skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render pcb-svg board.kicad_pcb before_dir --layers F.Cu,F.SilkS,Edge.Cuts --mode-single
skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render pcb-svg board.kicad_pcb after_dir --layers F.Cu,F.SilkS,Edge.Cuts --mode-single

Board 3D proof

skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render pcb-render board.kicad_pcb board.png --width 1800 --height 1200 --side top

Schematic proof

skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render schematic-svg design.kicad_sch out_dir

Symbol or footprint proof

skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render symbol-svg library.kicad_sym out_dir --symbol Device:R
skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render footprint-svg my.pretty out_dir --footprint SOIC-8_3.9x4.9mm_P1.27mm

Phase 3: Run machine checks

PCB DRC

Preferred command:

skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-drc-json board.kicad_pcb drc.json

Interpretation rules:

  • zero violations is strong evidence
  • nonzero violations must be reported explicitly
  • if the task intentionally leaves existing violations untouched, say so clearly

Schematic ERC

Preferred command:

skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-erc-json design.kicad_sch erc.json

If JSON output is unavailable or unsupported by the local version, capture plain CLI output and say that the evidence format is version-limited.

File re-inspection

For offline file edits, re-inspect the output with kiutils-inspect where useful:

skills/ki-stack/bin/kiutils-inspect output.kicad_pcb --show-unknown --show-diagnostics

Phase 4: Assess

Verification should answer these questions explicitly:

  1. Did the output artifact get generated?
  2. Does the artifact represent the intended object?
  3. Did machine checks pass?
  4. If checks failed, are the failures new or pre-existing?
  5. Is the result fully verified or only partially verified?

Phase 5: Report

Always report:

  • what was verified
  • which commands were run
  • artifact paths
  • check outputs and whether they passed
  • any known limitations in the verification method

Preferred report shape:

VERIFY REPORT
Target: <board|schematic|symbol|footprint>
Visual evidence: <paths>
Checks: <DRC/ERC/inspect outputs>
Result: <DONE|DONE_WITH_CONCERNS|BLOCKED>
Notes: <anything version-specific or unresolved>

Helper assets

References:

  • skills/ki-stack/references/render-recipes.md
  • skills/ki-stack/references/version-matrix.md

Helpers:

  • skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-render
  • skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-drc-json
  • skills/ki-stack/bin/kicad-erc-json
  • skills/ki-stack/bin/kiutils-inspect

Guardrails

  • Do not say "looks good" without artifact paths or check output.
  • If a check fails, report the failure instead of narrating around it.
  • If the local KiCad version limits the available evidence format, say so explicitly.
  • If the task changed something visual, render it.
  • If the task changed something electrical, run the relevant checks.

Completion states

  • DONE: render/check evidence supports the claimed result
  • DONE_WITH_CONCERNS: evidence exists but is partial, version-limited, or affected by pre-existing violations
  • BLOCKED: verification command failed irrecoverably or required tooling is unavailable
  • NEEDS_CONTEXT: the changed target or desired evidence format is unclear

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.