Agentic
Agentic-systems domain skill: review, design, audit, and framework selection for AI agent systems. Routes to one of four actions (review | design | audit | frameworks) backed by the rubrics in refs/. Use when: "agentic review", "review this agent system", "full agentic codebase review", "trust and safety audit", "audit my agents for GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2/NIST compliance", "design an agentic system", "design a multi-agent architecture", "which agentic framework should I use", "compare LangChain vs CrewAI vs AutoGen", or any former /wicked-garden:agentic:{review|design|audit|frameworks} invocation. Disambiguation: this domain reviews and designs **AI agent systems**. For ordinary source code use the engineering review; for a binding go/no-go verdict use the archetype review (see docs/domains.md → "review appears in three domains").From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden --skill agenticAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
6.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Agentic Domain
One entry point for the agentic domain. Pick the action from the request, parse its args, load its ref, and apply it inline.
Action router
| Action | Use for | Args | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
review | Full agentic-codebase review: framework detection, topology, architecture + safety + performance, remediation roadmap | [path] [--quick] [--framework NAME] [--output FILE] | refs/review.md |
design | Greenfield agentic system design: requirements → pattern + five-layer architecture → safety validation → design doc | [problem description] [--output FILE] | refs/design.md |
audit | Compliance-grade trust+safety audit: tool risk classification, HITL gates, PII handling, evidence | [path] [--standard GDPR|HIPAA|SOC2|NIST] [--output FILE] [--scenarios] | refs/audit.md |
frameworks | Framework selection / comparison / wizard | [--compare fw1,fw2,...] [--language python|typescript|java|go] [--use-case TYPE] | refs/frameworks.md |
Routing hints:
- Assessing existing agentic code →
review. Compliance-grade safety evidence →audit. Greenfield design →design. Picking or comparing frameworks →frameworks. - Ordinary (non-agent) source code → engineering review, not this skill.
- Binding go/no-go verdict → archetype review, not this skill.
Action: review
Full agentic-codebase review: framework detection → topology → architecture + safety + performance assessments → pattern scoring → unified remediation roadmap.
- Parse
[path],--quick,--framework,--output. Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/agentic/refs/review.md")— the full 5-step review rubric: framework+topology detection, architecture assessment, safety 8-layer, performance assessment, pattern scoring + issue taxonomy, and output format.- Run the detection scripts from the ref (Step 1). If
--quick, stop and return the structural summary. Otherwise apply all rubric steps directly. - Write to
--outputfile when set; otherwise return inline.
Heavyweight full review (optional dispatch)
For large codebases, or when independent parallel assessments are wanted, dispatch the three fork skills as parallel workers instead of applying rubric steps 2–4 inline, then merge their findings into the ref's unified roadmap:
wicked-garden-agentic-architect— five-layer architecture + agent topologywicked-garden-agentic-safety-reviewer— guardrails, prompt injection, PII, HITLwicked-garden-agentic-performance-analyst— tokens, latency, cost, parallelization
Action: design
Interactive design session for a new agentic system: requirements → pattern +
five-layer architecture → safety validation → design doc. Greenfield only —
use review to assess existing code, audit for compliance evidence.
- Parse
[problem description]and--output. Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/agentic/refs/design.md")— the design rubric: requirements gathering, pattern selection, five-layer architecture, safety section, framework recommendation, and output format.- Work through the rubric phases directly. If no problem statement is supplied, ask the 3–5 clarifying questions from the ref before proceeding.
- Write to
--outputfile when set; otherwise return inline.
Action: audit
Deep trust+safety audit: classifies tool risks, verifies HITL gates, checks PII
handling, optionally emits compliance evidence + wicked-scenarios. Use review
for the broader architecture+perf+safety sweep.
- Parse
[path],--standard,--output,--scenarios. Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/agentic/refs/audit.md")— the 8-layer rubric, checklist, compliance extensions, and output format.- Apply the rubric directly to the target path. For each layer, assess findings, classify severity, and build the risk matrix.
- If
--standardis given, append the matching compliance checklist from the ref. - If
--scenarios, emit awicked-scenariosblock per CRITICAL/HIGH finding. - Write to
--outputfile when set; otherwise return inline.
Action: frameworks
Framework selection / comparison / wizard. NOT for reviewing existing agentic
code (use review) or architecture design (use design).
- Derive mode from args:
--compare→ side-by-side comparison; filters only (--language,--use-case) → filtered selection; no args → interactive 5-question wizard. Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/agentic/refs/frameworks.md")— the mode detection table, wizard questions, decision tree, comparison table, scoring template, and output format.- Use WebSearch for latest 2026 ecosystem state (versions, features, community)
before rendering the comparison or recommendation. The curated framework
profiles live in the
skills/agentic/frameworks/knowledge module. - End output with a pointer to the
designaction of this skill as the next step.
Knowledge modules
The domain's reference knowledge lives beside this skill and is loaded on demand:
skills/agentic/agentic-patterns/— pattern catalog + five-layer modelskills/agentic/context-engineering/— context/token optimization techniquesskills/agentic/frameworks/— curated framework profiles + decision treeskills/agentic/review-methodology/— systematic review approachskills/agentic/trust-and-safety/— guardrail + HITL patterns