agentsclimarketplace

Release notes

Skill Mikefluff/skills/skills/release-notes

Write user-facing release notes + changelogs. Keep-a-Changelog format, sections Added/Changed/Fixed/Deprecated/Removed/Security. Per-audience tone (user/dev/ops). Anti-marketing-fluff bans. Wraps `writer`. Use when the user says 'release notes for vX.Y.Z', 'changelog entry', 'what's new', 'product update'.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Mikefluff/skills --skill release-notes

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 17 stars17 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

<!-- lint-role: catalogue --> <!-- This file lists the hype words the skill exists to strip, so it trips the slop linter by design. --> <objective> Write release notes that users actually read. Output: structured markdown release notes ready to publish on a changelog page / inside-app modal / email / GitHub release.

Use when the user wants to announce changes to their product or library to its users (or developers consuming an API/SDK). Not for internal engineering decisions — that's rfc-writer. Not for marketing landing pages — that's landing-copy.

This skill does NOT:

  • write RFCs / design docs / ADRs (use rfc-writer)
  • write landing-page marketing copy (use landing-copy)
  • write commit messages or PR descriptions (those are for engineers; release notes are downstream)
  • write blog posts about a release (different shape — use essay-write or viral-text) </objective>

ROLE

Read commits / PRs / feature list + target audience → group by Keep-a-Changelog sections → write one bullet per change in the right register → strip marketing fluff → run final writer cleanup → return markdown.

PIPELINE

  1. Identify audience. End user (uses the product UI) / developer (uses the API/SDK) / ops (deploys / monitors the product). Tone differs significantly — see references/audience-tone.md.

  2. Identify scope. Single feature announcement / version release / quarterly recap / monthly digest. Each has different length and structure.

  3. Gather changes. From git log / PR list / user-provided list. Group into:

    • Added — new features, new APIs, new options
    • Changed — behavior changes (non-breaking)
    • Fixed — bug fixes
    • Deprecated — still works, will be removed in vX
    • Removed — gone in this version
    • Security — vulnerabilities patched
    • Breaking — only for major versions (semver)

    See references/sections.md.

  4. Write one bullet per change.

    • Lead with the verb in past tense for "Added/Changed/Fixed/Removed"
    • Lead with the noun being deprecated for "Deprecated"
    • One line per bullet (allow continuation only if context matters)
    • User-facing benefit first, technical detail second
  5. Apply anti-fluff rules. Strip marketing language ("revolutionary", "game-changing"), "We're excited to announce", "We're thrilled to share". See references/banned-patterns.md.

  6. Order within sections. Most-impactful items first. Don't bury big features under a 12-bullet "Fixed" list.

  7. Add a header / lead (1-2 lines) for context: what version, what date, what theme if there is one. See references/structure.md.

  8. Final pass. Run through writer for anti-neuroslop + typography + structural-prose layers.

    Delete the water, not the function. Version numbers, dates, migration steps, breaking-change warnings and upgrade commands are load-bearing. Writer's default treatment is deletion; here that turns a changelog into an announcement nobody can act on. Treat them by replacement or simplification, and verify each survived the pass. See forbidden-substitutions.md in the writer skill.

MODES

  • release-notes <version> <changes-list> — write release notes for vX.Y.Z
  • release-notes --from-git <since-tag> — read git log since a tag, summarize
  • release-notes --from-prs <PR-list> — write notes from a list of PR titles/descriptions
  • release-notes --recap quarterly|monthly|annual — longer recap covering multiple releases
  • release-notes --audience user|dev|ops — explicit audience selection
  • release-notes --format changelog-md|github-release|email|in-app — output format
  • release-notes --improve <existing> — rewrite weak release notes

REFERENCES (load on demand)

FileWhen to load
references/sections.mdWhen categorizing changes — Keep-a-Changelog 6 sections + how to decide which applies
references/audience-tone.mdWhen picking voice — end-user / developer / ops differences
references/structure.mdWhen assembling — version header, lead, ordering, length budgets per format
references/banned-patterns.mdAfter draft — strip marketing fluff, hype, vague "we improved X"

EXAMPLES

See examples/before-after.md — 5 calibration pairs: weak release notes vs strong, across SaaS / API / library / mobile-app contexts.

CONSTRAINTS

  • No marketing hype. "Revolutionary", "groundbreaking", "game-changing", "next-generation" — strip on sight. The work speaks for itself.
  • No "We're excited / thrilled / proud to announce". State what shipped. The user doesn't care about your feelings.
  • No "Improved X" without specifics. Replace with: "Reduced X latency from 2.1s to 380ms" / "Now supports Y format" / "Fixed Z bug that affected users of W".
  • Past tense for shipped work. "Added dark mode" not "Adding dark mode" not "We are adding dark mode".
  • One bullet per change. Don't merge two features into one line ("Improved auth and payment flows" → split).
  • Specific over abstract. "Improved performance" → "Reduced search latency 5x"; "Better security" → "Enabled MFA by default for new accounts".
  • Link to longer docs when relevant. Release note is the headline; help-article / RFC / docs page is the body.
  • Date in ISO format. 2026-05-20, not "May 20, 2026" or "20/05/2026".
  • Version follows semver. Major (breaking) / minor (features) / patch (fixes).
  • No emoji in dev/ops audience. OK in light user-facing notes (🎉 for milestones), avoid in technical contexts.

INVOCATION HINTS

When the user says any of:

  • "release notes for vX.Y.Z"
  • "changelog entry / update"
  • "what's new in version..."
  • "summarize this release"
  • "monthly / quarterly recap"
  • "GitHub release notes"
  • "in-app announcement for the latest version"
  • "draft a release note about ..."

RU triggers (use the skill when the user writes any of):

  • «релизные заметки / релиз-ноуты»
  • «changelog для v3.4 / журнал изменений»
  • «что нового в версии ...»
  • «обнови changelog»
  • «опиши релиз / напиши анонс релиза»
  • «месячная / квартальная сводка по релизам»
  • «текст для in-app анонса нового релиза»

For RU tone (formal B2B, less emoji, числа в RU-формате), see references/audience-tone.md section RU tone notes.

Use this skill. For internal design docs / RFCs → rfc-writer. For marketing landing announcements → landing-copy. For viral social posts about the release → viral-text.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 627,801. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.