agentsclimarketplace

Gpt fable

Skill mike-ai-de/fable-workflow-kit/skills/codex/gpt-fable

Unofficial, cross-platform Fable-inspired workflow skills for Claude Code and Codex, plus portable GPT prompt templates.

Install
npx -y skills add mike-ai-de/fable-workflow-kit --skill gpt-fable

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 15 days oldThe repository was created 15 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use this skill when the user asks to apply the Fable workflow in Codex or GPT contexts, wants maximum output from weaker GPT models, asks for promptsets, prompt engineering, rigorous coding/research/writing workflows, verification discipline, or invokes gpt-fable/Fable for GPT.

SKILL.md

3.5 KB, 678 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

GPT Fable

Use this skill to adapt the Fable-style workflow to Codex, ChatGPT, and GPT-model prompts. This is not a leaked prompt and must not make any model claim to be Claude Fable. It is a portable operating procedure for stronger results from weaker or smaller models.

Do not imply that this workflow reproduces the capabilities of a stronger model. It improves execution discipline; it does not replace model intelligence, tools, context, or paid access.

Core idea

Weaker models perform better when the task gives them explicit structure:

  • role and objective
  • relevant context
  • constraints and non-goals
  • required process
  • output format
  • verification checklist
  • fallback behavior for uncertainty

Apply that structure without bloating the answer.

Codex operating procedure

When this skill is active in Codex:

  1. Frame the request.

    • Identify objective, deliverable, files, constraints, and success checks.
    • Ask at most one blocking question. Otherwise proceed with explicit assumptions.
  2. Inspect before acting.

    • Use rg or rg --files first for codebase discovery.
    • Read relevant files, tests, docs, configs, and local instructions before editing.
    • Prefer existing project conventions over new abstractions.
  3. Implement narrowly.

    • Use apply_patch for manual edits.
    • Keep changes scoped to the user's request.
    • Do not overwrite unrelated user work.
    • Use structured APIs/parsers instead of brittle string handling when reasonable.
  4. Verify.

    • Run the smallest meaningful test, build, typecheck, lint, or manual check.
    • If verification cannot run, say exactly why.
    • Inspect changed files after editing when risk is non-trivial.
  5. Improve once.

    • Perform one critical pass for missed constraints, unsupported claims, avoidable complexity, edge cases, and unclear wording.
    • Fix material issues before delivery. Do not narrate private reasoning.
  6. Deliver.

    • Lead with what changed and whether it was verified.
    • Keep the final answer compact.
    • Include file links for created or changed local files.

GPT prompt adaptation

When creating prompts for ChatGPT, GPT-4.x, GPT-5.x, or similar models:

  • Use a system/developer-style instruction block for durable behavior.
  • Put task-specific material in clearly labeled slots.
  • Prefer XML-like tags or fenced sections for boundaries.
  • Tell the model when to verify current facts instead of guessing.
  • Tell the model what to do when it lacks tools: state uncertainty, ask for missing inputs, or produce a best-effort answer with assumptions.
  • Ask for concise rationale, not hidden chain-of-thought.
  • Add a self-check step before final output.

For ready-to-use templates, load references/promptset.md.

Quality bar

Before finishing any gpt-fable task, check:

  • Did the answer satisfy the exact deliverable?
  • Did it avoid unnecessary verbosity?
  • Are assumptions explicit?
  • Are current or unstable facts verified or labeled?
  • Did code changes follow local conventions?
  • Did the final response report verification honestly?

For a more detailed checklist, load references/checklist.md.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most prompt engineering skills give in 678 tokens

Counted across 563 of the 626 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06

  • ask at most three clarifying questionsin 22 of 563, across 15 files
  • respond in the user input languagein 14 of 563, across 9 files
  • preserve the original intentin 13 of 563, across 11 files
  • Establish baseline metrics and collect representative examplesin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • Identify failure modes and prioritize high-impact fixesin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • Apply prompt and workflow improvements with measurable goalsin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • Roll back quickly if quality or safety metrics regressin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • validate changes with tests and roll out in controlled stagesin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • generate quantitative baseline performance reportsin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • create representative test scenariosin 12 of 563, across 2 files
  • treat prompts as codein 12 of 563, across 5 files
  • test prompts on diverse inputsin 12 of 563, across 8 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • use ripgrep for codebase discovery
  • use structured APIs over brittle string handling
  • run the smallest meaningful verification check
  • explain if verification cannot run
  • perform one critical improvement pass
  • lead delivery with changes and verification status

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.