Performing android app static analysis with mobsf
Open-source security arsenal for AI coding agents: 784 cybersecurity skills, scanner integrations, and a security MCP for Claude Code, Cursor, opencode, Gemini CLI, Cline, and any agentskills.io agent. Mapped to OWASP, MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF, D3FEND, ATLAS.
npx -y skills add Mikaru0Mystic/sectinel --skill performing-android-app-static-analysis-with-mobsfAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 11 stars11 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
'Performs automated static analysis of Android applications using Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) to identify hardcoded secrets, insecure permissions, vulnerable components, weak cryptography, and code-level security flaws without executing the application. Use when assessing Android APK/AAB files for security vulnerabilities before deployment, during penetration testing, or as part of CI/CD security gates. Activates for requests involving Android static analysis, MobSF scanning, APK security assessment, or mobile application code review.
The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.1 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Performing Android App Static Analysis with MobSF
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Conducting security assessment of Android APK or AAB files before production release
- Integrating automated mobile security scanning into CI/CD pipelines
- Performing initial triage of Android applications during penetration testing engagements
- Reviewing third-party Android applications for supply chain security risks
Do not use this skill as a replacement for manual code review or dynamic analysis -- MobSF static analysis catches pattern-based vulnerabilities but misses runtime logic flaws.
Prerequisites
- MobSF v4.x installed via Docker (
docker pull opensecurity/mobile-security-framework-mobsf) or local setup - Target Android APK, AAB, or source code ZIP
- Python 3.10+ for MobSF REST API integration
- JADX decompiler (bundled with MobSF) for Java/Kotlin source recovery
- Network access to MobSF web interface (default: http://localhost:8000)
Workflow
Step 1: Deploy MobSF and Obtain API Key
Launch MobSF using Docker for isolated, reproducible scanning:
docker run -it --rm -p 8000:8000 opensecurity/mobile-security-framework-mobsf:latest
Retrieve the REST API key from the MobSF web interface at http://localhost:8000/api_docs or from the startup console output. The API key enables programmatic scanning.
Step 2: Upload APK for Static Analysis
Upload the target APK using the MobSF REST API:
curl -F "file=@target_app.apk" http://localhost:8000/api/v1/upload \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>"
Response includes the hash identifier used for subsequent API calls. MobSF automatically decompiles the APK using JADX, extracts the AndroidManifest.xml, and indexes all resources.
Step 3: Trigger and Retrieve Static Scan Results
Initiate the static scan and retrieve results:
# Trigger scan
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/scan \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "scan_type=apk&file_name=target_app.apk&hash=<FILE_HASH>"
# Retrieve JSON report
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/report_json \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "hash=<FILE_HASH>"
Step 4: Analyze Critical Findings
MobSF static analysis covers these categories mapped to OWASP Mobile Top 10 2024:
Manifest Analysis (M8 - Security Misconfiguration):
- Exported activities, services, receivers, and content providers without permission guards
android:debuggable="true"left enabledandroid:allowBackup="true"enabling data extraction via ADB- Missing
android:networkSecurityConfigfor certificate pinning
Code Analysis (M1 - Improper Credential Usage):
- Hardcoded API keys, passwords, and tokens in Java/Kotlin source
- Insecure SharedPreferences usage for storing sensitive data
- Weak or broken cryptographic implementations (ECB mode, static IV, hardcoded keys)
Network Security (M5 - Insecure Communication):
- Missing certificate pinning configuration
- Custom TrustManagers that accept all certificates
- Cleartext HTTP traffic allowed without exception domains
Binary Analysis (M7 - Insufficient Binary Protections):
- Missing ProGuard/R8 obfuscation
- Native library vulnerabilities (stack canaries, NX bit, PIE)
- Debugger detection absence
Step 5: Generate and Export Reports
Export findings in multiple formats for stakeholder communication:
# PDF report
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/download_pdf \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "hash=<FILE_HASH>" -o report.pdf
# JSON for programmatic processing
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/report_json \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "hash=<FILE_HASH>" -o report.json
Step 6: Integrate into CI/CD Pipeline
Add MobSF scanning as a build gate:
# GitHub Actions example
- name: MobSF Static Analysis
run: |
UPLOAD=$(curl -s -F "file=@app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release.apk" \
http://mobsf:8000/api/v1/upload -H "Authorization: $MOBSF_API_KEY")
HASH=$(echo $UPLOAD | jq -r '.hash')
curl -s -X POST http://mobsf:8000/api/v1/scan \
-H "Authorization: $MOBSF_API_KEY" \
-d "scan_type=apk&file_name=app-release.apk&hash=$HASH"
SCORE=$(curl -s -X POST http://mobsf:8000/api/v1/scorecard \
-H "Authorization: $MOBSF_API_KEY" -d "hash=$HASH" | jq '.security_score')
if [ "$SCORE" -lt 60 ]; then exit 1; fi
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Static Analysis | Examination of application code and resources without executing the program; catches structural and pattern-based vulnerabilities |
| APK Decompilation | Process of recovering Java/Kotlin source from compiled Dalvik bytecode using tools like JADX or apktool |
| AndroidManifest.xml | Configuration file declaring app components, permissions, and security attributes; primary target for manifest analysis |
| Certificate Pinning | Technique binding an app to specific server certificates to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks via rogue CAs |
| ProGuard/R8 | Code obfuscation and shrinking tools that make reverse engineering more difficult by renaming classes and removing unused code |
Tools & Systems
- MobSF: Automated mobile security analysis framework supporting static and dynamic analysis of Android/iOS apps
- JADX: Dex-to-Java decompiler for recovering readable source code from Android APK files
- apktool: Tool for reverse engineering Android APK files, decoding resources to near-original form
- Android Lint: Google's static analysis tool for Android-specific code quality and security issues
- Semgrep: Pattern-based static analysis engine with mobile-specific rule packs for custom vulnerability detection
Common Pitfalls
- Ignoring false positives: MobSF flags patterns like
passwordin variable names even when not storing actual credentials. Triage all HIGH findings manually before reporting. - Missing obfuscated code: Static analysis accuracy drops significantly against obfuscated apps. Supplement with dynamic analysis for apps using DexGuard or custom packers.
- Outdated MobSF rules: Security rules evolve with Android API levels. Ensure MobSF is updated to match the target app's
targetSdkVersion. - Skipping native code analysis: MobSF analyzes Java/Kotlin but has limited coverage of native C/C++ libraries. Use
checksecand manual review for.sofiles.
What ships with it: 7 files
43.8 KB alongside SKILL.md, 2 of them executable
assets/
- template.md3.6 KB
references/
- api-reference.md5.5 KB
- standards.md2.9 KB
- workflows.md3.7 KB
scripts/
- agent.pyruns9.0 KB
- process.pyruns8.1 KB
- LICENSE11.0 KB