Ship

Ship

Take the current branch from "code done" to "merged" in one pass. This is a thin orchestrator: every step delegates to the sibling skill that already owns that logic. Do not re-implement review rules, commit conventions, or PR templates here: invoke the skill.

Pipeline integrity

Every stage's reported result must quote the actual command you ran and its actual exit status or output. A stage you did not run is reported as SKIPPED: <reason>, never as passed, never estimated, never inferred from a similar-looking earlier run. The whole value of a ship train is that green means green; one fabricated gate poisons every stage after it, because the human trusts stage 6 only because they trust stages 1-5.

The train

Run these in order. Stop at the first red gate and report it, do not skip a step or push through a failure.

#	Step	How
1	Pre-flight	Confirm there's a diff to ship, working tree state, target base branch
2	Code review	Invoke the review-code skill on the current diff
3	Pre-merge checks	Auto-detect and run project checks (tests, lint, visual diff)
4	Commit	Invoke the git-commit skill's conventions
5	PR	Invoke the git-create-pr skill's conventions
6	CI + merge	Watch CI (optional), report or merge on green

Track progress with TodoWrite (one line per step above) so the user sees where the train is if a gate stops it.

Step 1: Pre-flight

• git branch --show-current: refuse to run on main/master/dev directly (nothing to ship from a target branch).
• git status --porcelain: if dirty, use AskUserQuestion (or ask in plain text if that tool isn't available) whether to include the changes or stop.
• Determine base branch: use --base if given, else gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name, else main.
• git log <base>..HEAD --oneline: if empty, there's nothing to ship; stop and say so.

Step 2: Code review

Invoke the review-code skill (via the Skill tool where available, otherwise apply its review dimensions inline) scoped to the diff against the base branch. This is analysis only: it does not touch files.

• Any Critical/High finding: stop, report it with file:line, and let the user decide (fix and re-run, or explicitly accept the risk). Do not proceed silently.
• Medium/Low findings: report them but continue, they don't block the train.

Step 3: Pre-merge checks (auto-detected)

The project's own gates matter more than a generic test run. Detect what's actually configured before running anything, never invent a command:

1. justfile: look for visual-diff, test, check recipes (just --list if present).
2. Makefile: look for test, check, lint targets.
3. package.json: look at scripts for test, lint, typecheck, e2e.
4. Framework-native fallback (pytest, cargo test, etc.) only if none of the above exist.

A Haiku Explore subagent is the cheap way to do this detection without burning main-thread context:

Task tool with Explore agent:
- prompt: "Find pre-merge check commands for this repo: look for a justfile
    (especially a visual-diff or visual regression recipe), Makefile targets,
    and package.json scripts. Return the exact commands to run, do not invent any."
- subagent_type: "Explore"
- model: "haiku"

No Task tool available: run the same detection inline: just --list (or read the justfile), grep the Makefile's target names, cat package.json's scripts block, then run whatever it finds directly.

Run every command found. Any non-zero exit: stop, show the failing output, do not proceed to commit. This includes visual regression diffs: a passing test suite with a failing visual diff is still a red gate.

Step 4: Commit

Follow the git-commit skill's conventions (invoke it if available, otherwise apply the same rules inline): Conventional Commits format, imperative mood, stage only the files that belong to this change, split into multiple commits if the diff mixes unrelated concerns.

Step 5: Pull request

Follow the git-create-pr skill's conventions (invoke it if available, otherwise apply the same rules inline): conventional-commit-style title, PR body filled from the actual commits/diff (no invented claims), push the branch, open against the base branch determined in Step 1.

Step 6: CI + merge (optional)

• If --no-merge was passed, or the user only asked to get the PR open, stop here and report the PR URL.
• Otherwise watch CI: gh pr checks <number> --watch or poll gh pr checks <number> every couple of minutes, don't tight-loop.
• Red CI: stop, show the failing check name and a log excerpt, do not merge, do not retry blindly.
• Green CI: only merge if the user asked to get this merged (e.g. "get this merged", "merge when green") or confirms when asked. Otherwise just report green and let the user merge themselves.
• When merging, use squash unless the repo's own convention says otherwise (check for a CONTRIBUTING.md or existing merge history via gh pr list --state merged --limit 5). Never force-push, never bypass hooks or required checks to get a merge through.

Reporting

Every report (stopped or completed) ends with a stage table: # | Stage | Command | Result. One row per step in "The train", in order. Command is the literal command (or skill invocation) you actually ran for that stage; Result is its actual exit status or a one-line summary of its actual output. Any stage not reached gets Command: — and Result: SKIPPED: not reached. This table is what makes fabrication visible: never fill a row from what a stage "should" produce, only from what it did.

If everything went green and merged, say so plainly, the user should not have to re-check gh pr view. Every number, check name, or pass/fail verdict in the table must come from a command actually run this session.

Example: stopped at code review (Step 2)

Ship train stopped at step 2/6: code review.

| # | Stage        | Command                          | Result                              |
|---|--------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| 1 | Pre-flight   | git log main..HEAD --oneline     | 4 commits ahead, OK                 |
| 2 | Code review  | Skill: review-code (diff vs main)| 1 High: session.ts:42 uses `==` on token, BLOCKED |
| 3 | Pre-merge    | —                                 | SKIPPED: not reached                 |
| 4 | Commit       | —                                 | SKIPPED: not reached                 |
| 5 | PR           | —                                 | SKIPPED: not reached                 |
| 6 | CI + merge   | —                                 | SKIPPED: not reached                 |

Fix the finding and re-run, or tell me to accept the risk and continue.

Example: stopped at a pre-merge check (Step 3)

Ship train stopped at step 3/6: pre-merge checks.

| # | Stage        | Command            | Result                                  |
|---|--------------|---------------------|------------------------------------------|
| 1 | Pre-flight   | git log main..HEAD  | 6 commits ahead, OK                    |
| 2 | Code review  | Skill: review-code  | 0 Critical/High, OK                    |
| 3 | Pre-merge    | just visual-diff     | exit 1, 3 snapshots differ, BLOCKED    |
| 4 | Commit       | —                    | SKIPPED: not reached                    |
| 5 | PR           | —                    | SKIPPED: not reached                    |
| 6 | CI + merge   | —                    | SKIPPED: not reached                    |

Fix the diffs (or run `just visual-update` if they're intended) and re-run.

Example: full train, merged on green

Ship train complete: merged.

| # | Stage        | Command                                    | Result                                   |
|---|--------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| 1 | Pre-flight   | git log main..HEAD --oneline               | feature/search-filters, 4 commits ahead    |
| 2 | Code review  | Skill: review-code (diff vs main)          | 0 Critical/High, 2 Low (non-blocking)      |
| 3 | Pre-merge    | just test; just visual-diff                | 42 passed; 0 diffs                          |
| 4 | Commit       | git commit -m "feat(search): ..."          | committed 4f2a91c                           |
| 5 | PR           | gh pr create ...                            | https://github.com/org/repo/pull/213        |
| 6 | CI + merge   | gh pr checks 213 --watch; gh pr merge --squash | lint/test/build green, squash-merged  |