Tempofastlane
Parent-gated delegation protocol for Codex. Proof beats green tests.
npx -y skills add maxkle1nz/codex-fastlane --skill tempofastlaneAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Unified delegation and temporal-calibration protocol. Use when delegating bounded implementation work to a worker model such as GPT-5.3-Codex, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark, or a GPT-5.4 low/mini lane while the high-reasoning parent preserves cognitive budget for architecture, synthesis, proof, integration, and final verification. Embeds TEMPONIZER into effort, abort/iterate, and parallelism decisions.
SKILL.md
21.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
TempoFastlane
Purpose
Convert a worker model into a fast, bounded implementer while the parent agent owns architecture, acceptance criteria, proof integrity, integration, and final verification. Eliminate Temporal Inheritance Bias (TIB) from every delegation, scoping, and iteration decision so that the worker is dispatched on empirical wall-clock grounds rather than on human-derived planning priors inherited from the training corpus.
The worker is excellent at quickly producing a patch when the task is bounded and the context is complete. It is a high-speed implementer, not the final gate. The parent enforces ownership, proof, integration, and hardening.
Operating Rule
Delegate construction; centralize judgment and integration. Apply temporal calibration before any delegation, scoping, or iteration decision is made.
The parent protects its cognitive budget. A frontier parent may run on a premium high-reasoning model, but it should spend that reasoning on translating the human idea into mission, architecture, lane contracts, proof design, integration, and synthesis. It should write routine code only when the edit is smaller than delegation overhead or when it is repairing an integration gap found during final proof.
The parent agent must:
- decide whether model control or full-history fork matters more;
- choose the smallest capable worker lane for the task;
- take a baseline snapshot before delegation;
- define the exact mission and write scope;
- include all critical context and constraints;
- provide exact verification commands, not guessed script names;
- require causal proof, not merely "tests passed";
- monitor for scope drift while the worker runs;
- inspect the returned patch;
- integrate the returned work into the surrounding system;
- perform wiring and hardening before reporting acceptance;
- run independent verification;
- harden gaps before accepting;
- record actual wall-clock duration (
Te) per phase to recalibrate temporal priors used by future delegations.
Temporal Operating Rule (TEMPONIZER)
Pre-execution duration estimates produced by language model agents are calibrated to human workflows present in training corpora rather than to the agent's effective runtime behavior. This is Temporal Inheritance Bias (TIB). Across repeated operational sessions, agents predict durations such as "approximately 30 minutes" or "approximately 3 hours" while measured wall-clock completion times are minutes or seconds, yielding large estimate-to-actual ratios. TIB corrupts effort selection, abort/iterate decisions, parallelism, and overall delegation strategy.
Correction heuristic: apply Tc = alpha(phi) * Tp for every duration claim,
where Tp is the inherited intuitive estimate, phi is the operational phase,
alpha(phi) is the phase-aware scalar, and Tc is the corrected prediction.
Operational phases:
GEN: pure text or code generation, no external I/O.IO: tool calls, API requests, disk or network operations.DBG: integration work, debugging, multi-file reasoning.PAR: parallel execution of independent subtasks.
Initial prior: alpha(phi) ~= 0.05 as a starting point. Recalibrate online
from measured Te per phase.
Calibration loop: estimate -> execute -> measure -> recalibrate. Every
execution emits a measured Te from initiation to final output, which updates
alpha(phi) for future runs. Without the loop, TIB persists.
Behavioral rules:
- Never assert a duration in minutes or hours without first identifying
phi, applyingalpha(phi), and reporting the corrected figure in the smallest unit that fits. - When uncertain, prefer underestimating and measuring over inheriting human intuition.
- Treat parallelism as the default execution shape, not as an advanced optimization. Issue independent tool calls in the same batch.
- The wall-clock is authoritative. The intuitive duration is a corpus artifact, not a measurement.
Repository-Agnostic Rule
TempoFastlane is universal. Never assume a specific repository, framework, artifact name, proof format, docs layout, branch policy, or release ritual.
Before delegation, infer the current repo's conventions from local files and commands. Use repo-native names, such as its test scripts, proof artifacts, changelog, release notes, checkpoint docs, snapshots, screenshots, and generated outputs, only after discovering them locally.
If the repo has no docs, changelog, checkpoint, scorecard, or proof artifact convention, do not invent one as part of the delegated task unless the user explicitly asks. Instead, report what was verified and what artifact sync would be useful.
Glossary
- Worker lane: operational name for the delegated model tasked with construction, audit, research, or support work under a parent-owned contract.
- Spark:
gpt-5.3-codex-spark, a research preview lane for near-instant compact text/code iteration when available. - Coder lane:
gpt-5.3-codexfor substantial bounded code-only work when Spark is not needed. - xhigh / high / medium / low: reasoning effort tiers. Use the lowest tier that can satisfy the proof contract without increasing parent rework.
- fork_context: spawn flag controlling whether the worker inherits the
parent's full conversation history.
trueinherits and forces parent model settings.falseallows explicit model and effort overrides but requires the parent to embed all needed context in the prompt. - Proof artifact: any repo-native file that records observable runtime behavior: log, screenshot, JSON status file, generated output snapshot.
- Artifact Sync Gate: the parent's final pass to align repo-native public docs, changelog, or evidence files with verified behavior. Run only when those conventions already exist or the user explicitly asks.
- TIB: Temporal Inheritance Bias.
- Tp / Tc / Te: inherited estimate, corrected estimate, measured execution time.
- alpha(phi): phase-aware temporal scalar.
Living Skill Loop
TempoFastlane is a living skill. When the parent agent uses it several times in a row, or sees the same failure mode more than once, it should look for improvements to the universal workflow.
Propose a skill update when a pattern is:
- repeated across multiple delegated tasks or likely to recur in other repos;
- about delegation quality, model and effort selection, proof integrity, runtime preflight, artifact sync, handoff format, ownership boundaries, anti-false-positive checks, or temporal calibration;
- expressible without project-specific names, paths, domains, or one-off commands.
Do not update the skill for:
- a repo-specific convention that belongs in that repo's docs;
- a one-off bug fix;
- a preference that has not improved proof or reduced rework;
- a memory that only makes sense with private conversation context.
Update protocol:
- Name the reusable lesson in one sentence.
- Explain why it belongs in TempoFastlane rather than in the current repo.
- Propose the smallest universal wording change.
- If the lesson is already covered by existing wording, edit it. Do not append a duplicate.
- Apply the update only if the user explicitly asks, or if the current instruction already authorizes updating the skill.
- At most one skill update proposal per session, to prevent drift.
- Validate frontmatter, template consistency, and absence of repo-specific names before reporting completion.
Temporal feedback into the loop: when measured Te diverges from Tp in a
stable per-phase pattern across runs, propose updating the default
alpha(phi) prior used in this skill. Subject to the one-proposal-per-session
limit.
When To Use
Use this skill when the user asks to:
- use Codex Spark, GPT-5.3-Codex, a worker, subagent, xhigh, high, medium, or low for fast implementation;
- test a delegated implementation workflow;
- split implementation from verification;
- make a bounded code change where the parent can continue as quality gate.
Avoid this workflow when:
- the task is unclear or exploratory only;
- the next step is immediately blocked on analysis the parent should do locally;
- the write scope cannot be isolated;
- a false positive would be expensive and no runtime proof is possible.
Model And Effort Selection
Effort is chosen on temporal-corrected grounds, not on intuitive task size.
Compute Tc = alpha(phi) * Tp and assess parental rework risk before selecting
a tier.
Choose the worker by lane fit first, then reasoning effort:
coder:gpt-5.3-codexmedium/high for bounded code-only implementation, debugging, focused refactors, tests, and repo-native patches.spark:gpt-5.3-codex-sparkmedium/xhigh for near-instant compact iteration when Spark is available.fastworker:gpt-5.4low orgpt-5.4-minimedium for low-risk mechanical support lanes.auditer:gpt-5.4high orgpt-5.5high for proof-gap hunting, edge-case review, and security-shaped checks.parent:gpt-5.5orgpt-5.4high/xhigh for mission synthesis, architecture, final proof, and integration judgment.
Use low or medium only when all of these are true:
- the task is bounded and mechanical;
- the write set is small and explicitly owned;
- the existing pattern is clear;
- acceptance criteria are observable;
- the parent can cheaply inspect and rerun verification;
- the worker is not being asked to make product, architecture, model-selection, or proof-policy decisions.
Low and medium are cost-control lanes, not context-control lanes. Give them the same full task context, baseline dirty state, file ownership, forbidden surfaces, proof criteria, and final handoff requirements as high or xhigh. Reduce task size, not instruction quality.
Escalate model or effort when:
- the worker must infer missing architecture;
- the patch crosses ownership boundaries;
- the proof path is subtle or easy to fake;
- the first attempt produces broad rewrites, guessed commands, or vague handoff claims;
- parent review finds a causal proof gap.
Never change the parent or global model mode to test a fast lane. Model and effort experiments happen only inside the sidecar worker.
Temporal note: a task that "feels large" is often GEN with alpha ~= 0.05
and suits medium. A task that "feels small" but contains DBG phases requires
xhigh. Size intuition is Tp inflated by TIB; do not let it drive tier choice.
Delegation Protocol
Before Spawning The Worker
- Inspect enough local context to write a precise task.
- Capture a baseline:
git status -sb, relevant focused diff or grep, and known command names frompackage.jsonor repo scripts. - Decide spawn mode:
- To force a specific worker model or effort, spawn with
fork_context: falseand embed full task context in the prompt. - When full conversation history matters more, use
fork_context: trueand omit model/effort overrides because forked agents inherit parent settings.
- To force a specific worker model or effort, spawn with
- State the implementation goal in one paragraph.
- Give explicit file ownership and forbidden surfaces.
- Tell the worker it is not alone in the codebase and must not revert unrelated changes.
- Define acceptance criteria in terms of observable proof.
- Require final handoff with files changed, commands run, proof artifacts,
exact proof fields, limitations, concerns, and per-phase
Teif measurable. - Issue independent preparation calls in parallel: spawn, baseline capture, adjacent grep, and command discovery in one batch unless logically dependent.
While The Worker Runs
- Do useful non-overlapping review setup locally.
- If the worker runs longer than the corrected
Tcwould predict, inspect git status, focused diffs, or proof artifacts without redoing its assigned implementation. - Stop or redirect only if it touches forbidden surfaces, changes ownership boundaries, or appears to be solving the wrong problem.
Parent Integration Loop
After the worker returns:
- Read the changed files or focused diff.
- Compare the result against the baseline. Distinguish files the worker actually changed from files already dirty before delegation.
- Integrate the patch with adjacent code paths the worker did not own: CLI wiring, imports, registry entries, docs hooks, fixtures, schemas, adapters, generated-contract surfaces, or artifact plumbing when required.
- Harden obvious gaps immediately: path safety, compatibility fallbacks, error handling, deterministic artifacts, anti-false-positive checks, and contract drift guards.
- Look for false positives where the test may not exercise the new path.
- Run unit tests yourself.
- Run runtime or integration proof yourself.
- Inspect generated proof artifacts, screenshots, logs, or browser output.
- Add any final hardening found by proof inspection.
- Record measured
Teper phase and update localalpha(phi)priors. - Close the worker once accepted or superseded.
The parent must not hand back a raw worker patch when local wiring or hardening is clearly needed. A TempoFastlane run is complete only after the parent has converted the worker's slice into an integrated, verifiable repo state.
When To Abort vs Iterate
Before abandoning a patch on the grounds that "iteration would take too long",
compute the corrected Tc for the iteration step. Iteration is almost always
cheaper than re-delegation because Tp is inflated by TIB.
Discard the patch and re-delegate with smaller scope when any of these appear:
- gross ownership violation;
- fabricated proof;
- broad unauthorized rewrite of files the patch was not supposed to touch;
- handoff claims pre-existing dirty files as newly created;
- repeated guessed command names after the parent supplied the real ones.
Iterate when:
- ownership was respected but proof signal is weak;
- wiring is missing but the core slice is correct;
- a single anti-false-positive check needs adding.
Proof Contract
For every delegated feature, define two paths whenever possible:
- Legacy path still works.
- New path is exercised and leaves a different observable mark.
Examples:
- Generated smoke path: proof contains
runtime_smoke.source=generated. - Fallback smoke path: proof contains
runtime_smoke.source=generated-fallbackandfallback_generated=true. - Cache miss path: log or proof contains
cache=miss. - Migration path: DB schema version changes and migrated data is still readable.
If existing behavior can mask the new path, require a force flag or deterministic setup that makes the new path unavoidable.
When there is no runtime path, substitute the runtime contract with a structural diff snapshot: a before/after capture of a public signature, exported API surface, fixture shape, or generated contract file.
Temporal note on proof: do not reject a proof artifact on the grounds that it executed too quickly. A smoke that completes in seconds is the wall-clock truth correcting TIB, not a suspicious signal. Reject on causal content, not on speed.
Anti-False-Positive Rules
Do not accept:
- "I removed X" if the generator recreates X before the relevant stage.
- "Unit tests cover it" when the claim is about runtime behavior.
- "Smoke passed" if the smoke used the old path.
- "Smoke failed" without checking whether the app, server, or runtime prerequisite was running.
- A guessed command name when the repo has a different script in
package.json. - A handoff that claims already-dirty files were newly created by the worker.
- Docs claiming success before proof artifacts confirm it.
- A duration claim stated without phase classification and
alpha(phi)applied.
Require the worker to explicitly answer:
- What proves the new code path ran?
- Which proof file contains it?
- Which field, log line, status, or output confirms it?
- What could still be masking a false positive?
- Which commands were copied from repo scripts, and which were inferred?
- Which files were already dirty before it started?
- What was the measured
Teper phase? - Did this run reveal a reusable workflow improvement the parent should consider?
Command And Runtime Preflight
Delegated tasks often fail for boring reasons: wrong script name, no dev server, stale port, missing env, or a worker assuming a runtime is alive.
Before delegation, the parent should give the worker:
- exact command names copied from
package.json, Makefile, task runner, or docs; - required services and ports, for example
npm run devservinghttp://127.0.0.1:7777; - whether the worker may start background services or should leave runtime proof to the parent;
- expected artifact paths for browser screenshots, logs, or proof JSON.
If a runtime command fails, the worker must classify it:
code-failure: the patch broke behavior;environment-blocker: service, port, credential, or external runtime missing;command-error: command name or invocation was wrong.
The parent still reruns the final runtime proof independently.
Coupling Rules: TEMPONIZER x Delegation
- Effort selection is a function of
alpha(phi) * Tpand parental rework risk, not of intuitive task size. Reclassify before selecting a tier. - Abort versus iterate is decided after computing corrected iteration cost. Most restart reflexes are TIB artifacts.
- Parallelism is mandatory for independent preparation steps. Spawn, baseline, grep, and command discovery share a single batch.
- Handoff requires
Te. Per-phase wall-clock measurements feed the Living Skill Loop. "Done" withoutTeis an incomplete handoff when measurement was feasible. - Proof speed is not a defect. Anti-false-positive review evaluates causal content, not duration.
- Skill updates are temporal-aware. Stable
TeversusTpdrift per phase is itself grounds for proposing analpha(phi)update, subject to the one-proposal-per-session limit.
Prompt Template
Read references/delegation-template.md when preparing a worker task. It
contains a reusable prompt with context, ownership, acceptance criteria,
verification, handoff, and Te reporting sections.
Use the template as a starting point, then fill in project-specific paths, commands, proof fields, risk notes, and expected phase classification.
Case Notes
Field-tested lessons from real runs are kept in references/case-notes.md.
Read them when designing a new delegation, especially for generator work,
runtime or browser proof, medium-tier worker runs, or temporal recalibration
events. The examples there are illustrative; adapt to the artifacts native to
the current repo.
Parent Gate Checklist
Group A: Pre-acceptance
- Parent used the correct spawn mode: model override without full fork, or full fork without override.
- Baseline dirty state was captured before delegation.
- Worker changed only owned files or justified exceptions.
- Worker did not claim pre-existing dirty or new files as newly created.
- Verification command names match actual repo scripts.
- Unit tests pass locally.
- Integration or runtime proof passes locally.
- The new behavior has a distinct proof signal, or a structural diff snapshot when no runtime path exists.
- Proof artifacts are named in the final report.
- Limitations are honest and not reframed as success.
- Per-phase
Tewas recorded when measurement was feasible. - Any duration claim in the handoff was reported as
Tcafter applyingalpha(phi), not as rawTp.
Group B: Integration
- Parent integrated the returned work with adjacent wiring required by the feature.
- Parent performed local hardening before declaring the lane accepted.
- The patch preserves existing CLI or API compatibility unless explicitly allowed.
Group C: Post-acceptance
- Repo-specific docs, changelog, release notes, checkpoints, scorecards, or public artifacts match verified behavior when those conventions exist.
- For a major checkpoint or category uplevel, the Artifact Sync Gate ran: update only repo-native public or method docs and evidence files that exist or are explicitly requested.
- If several runs exposed a repeated workflow pattern, the parent proposed a universal skill update or recorded why no update is warranted.
- If stable
TeversusTpdrift was observed across runs, the parent considered analpha(phi)prior update for this skill.
Master Rule
Velocity without proof is a regression. Proof without temporal calibration is TIB performing as discipline. TempoFastlane resolves both: temporal self-correction unlocks empirically grounded velocity, and the delegation protocol enforces ownership, causal proof, integration, and hardening over that velocity. Apply both layers to every delegation, every effort selection, every iterate-or-abort decision, and every handoff.