Karvey devex

Karvey DevEx — DX Reviewer

CROSS-CUTTING SKILL of the Karvey™ Method. This is a support layer, NOT a phase. It does NOT modify spec.json:phase. It does NOT advance the method's flow. It can be invoked at any time, as many times as needed, without altering the project's state.

Inspired by gstack /plan-devex-review + /devex-review.

Purpose

Measure and improve the experience of whoever adopts or uses the project (developer experience). The focus is not the functional correctness of the code, but how easy, fast, and pleasant it is for a newcomer to get from "zero" to their first useful result — the famous time-to-hello-world (TTHW).

The role is that of a DX Reviewer: someone who puts themselves in the shoes of whoever has just arrived, walks the real onboarding path, and reports every friction point, every "magic moment", and every "docs lie" (docs that promise something the reality doesn't deliver).

Two modes

Mode	When	What it does
plan	There's a plan/architecture but no running implementation yet	Design-level review: estimates the expected TTHW, identifies anticipated friction and the "magic moments" the design should deliver.
live	There's something executable (repo, installable, service)	Walks the REAL onboarding: clone, install, run the first "hello world", measures the real TTHW, and detects broken steps and docs lies.

If --mode is not passed, infer it: if there's an executable artifact available → live; if there's only a plan/spec/architecture → plan.

Three lenses (always apply all three)

1. Expansion (what's missing) — gaps in the path: undocumented steps, hidden prerequisites, configuration nobody explained, cases the onboarding ignores.
2. Polish (what to refine) — things that work but scrape: unclear error messages, confusing names, long commands, bad defaults, noisy output, copy that could be better.
3. Triage (what's critical) — what blocks or drives away the adopter: what makes someone quit before the first success. This is what gets fixed first.

Steps

plan mode

1. Read the project's plan / architecture / spec (spec.json, requirements, architecture, design READMEs, mockups). Identify who the target adopter is (internal dev? external integrator? technical end user?).
2. Trace the expected path from "I discovered the project" to "I got my first useful result". List each anticipated step: install, configure, authenticate, first command/call, first output.
3. Estimate the expected TTHW and mark where the design introduces unnecessary friction (avoidable manual steps, heavy dependencies, prior configuration, secrets to obtain).
4. Identify the "magic moments" the design should produce — the instant when the adopter says "ah, this actually works". Verify the plan delivers them early.
5. Apply the three lenses (Expansion / Polish / Triage) over the design.
6. Report prioritized findings with concrete recommendations (see format below).

live mode

1. Start from true zero. Simulate a clean environment. If possible, use a subagent (Agent) with instructions to "assume nothing, just follow the documentation literally" to walk the onboarding without the bias of someone who already knows the project.
2. Walk the REAL onboarding following ONLY the documentation, step by step: clone → install → configure → first "hello world". Time it from the start to the first useful result → that's the real TTHW.
3. Note every "docs lie": every time a command, path, variable name, expected output, or prerequisite in the docs does not match reality. Cite the doc, the command executed, and what actually happened.
4. Record the broken steps: commands that fail, missing dependencies, implicit undocumented steps, errors that require external knowledge to resolve.
5. Locate the true "magic moment" and measure how much it costs to reach it. If it arrives late or never, that's critical Triage.
6. Apply the three lenses over the real experience lived.
7. Report prioritized findings with recommendations (see format below).

Report format (both modes)

• DX verdict + TTHW (estimated in plan, measured in live).
• Critical (Triage) — what blocks or scares off the adopter. Fix first.
• Friction (Polish) — what scrapes but doesn't block.
• Gaps (Expansion) — what's missing.
• Docs lies — only in live: doc vs. reality, with citation.
• Magic moments — where they are and whether they arrive in time.
• Each finding with: location, impact on the adopter, and an actionable recommendation.

Reminders

• Does not advance the phase. Do not touch spec.json:phase or mark anything as completed in the method's flow. This skill only observes, measures, and recommends.
• It is read-only over the method's state: it can run onboarding commands in live (install, run), but it does not edit the project's code or its spec.
• It can be run as many times as wanted, in any phase of the project.

---

Part of the Karvey™ Method — © HainTech, by Mauricio Quezada Ibáñez · Apache 2.0 · see karvey/LICENSE and karvey/TRADEMARK.md.