Prd patterns
Skill Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack/plugins/devtools-pack/skills/prd-patterns
When to activate: PRD, product requirements document, feature spec, functional spec, requirements writing, acceptance criteria, edge casesFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack --skill prd-patternsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.8 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
PRD Patterns
PRD Structure Template
# [Feature Name] PRD
**Status**: Draft | In Review | Approved | Shipped
**Author**: [Name]
**Reviewers**: [Engineering Lead], [Design Lead], [Data], [Legal if needed]
**Last Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Target Release**: Q[X] YYYY
---
## 1. Problem Statement
One paragraph. What user pain exists? What evidence supports it?
## 2. Goals & Success Metrics
- Goal 1: [Outcome, not output]
- Success metric: [Specific measurable target with baseline]
## 3. Non-Goals
- Explicitly exclude scope to prevent creep
## 4. User Stories
[See user-stories.md for format]
## 5. Functional Requirements
FR-001: [Requirement]
FR-002: [Requirement]
## 6. Non-Functional Requirements
NFR-001: Latency < 200ms at p95
NFR-002: Availability 99.9%
## 7. UX/Design
[Figma link] [Key screens described]
## 8. Technical Considerations
[Architecture notes, dependencies, risks]
## 9. Edge Cases & Error States
[Table of edge cases]
## 10. Analytics Plan
[Events to instrument]
## 11. Launch Plan
[Phased rollout, feature flags, comms]
## 12. Open Questions
| Question | Owner | Due |
|----------|-------|-----|
Acceptance Criteria Writing
GIVEN / WHEN / THEN Format
GIVEN [context/precondition]
WHEN [action taken]
THEN [expected outcome]
AND [additional assertion]
Example:
GIVEN a user is logged in with a free plan
WHEN they click "Export to CSV"
THEN they see an upgrade modal
AND the modal shows Pro plan features
AND clicking "Upgrade" redirects to /billing
Checklist Format (simpler features)
AC-001: User can filter by date range
- [ ] Start date defaults to 30 days ago
- [ ] End date defaults to today
- [ ] Invalid range (start > end) shows inline error
- [ ] Maximum range: 365 days; exceeding shows error message
- [ ] Empty result set shows empty state with CTA
Edge Cases Documentation
Edge Case Table
| Scenario | Input | Expected Behavior | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empty state | No data returned | Show empty state UI with CTA | P0 |
| Network error | API timeout > 5s | Show retry toast, do not lose data | P0 |
| Concurrent edit | Two users edit same record | Last-write-wins with timestamp | P1 |
| Invalid characters | SQL injection attempt | Sanitize input, reject gracefully | P0 |
| Max payload | File > 10MB upload | Show size limit error before upload | P1 |
| Session expired | Token expires mid-flow | Redirect to login, preserve intent | P0 |
Error States Checklist
- 400 Bad Request: show user-friendly validation message
- 401 Unauthorized: redirect to login
- 403 Forbidden: show "you don't have access" message
- 404 Not Found: show 404 page with navigation
- 429 Rate Limited: show "too many requests, try again in X seconds"
- 500 Server Error: show generic error with support link
- Network offline: show offline banner, queue actions if feasible
Requirement Writing Rules
DO
- Use "the system SHALL" for mandatory requirements
- Use "the system SHOULD" for recommended
- Use "the system MAY" for optional
- Reference exact UI element names from design
- Include specific numbers (thresholds, limits, timeouts)
- Attach Figma links to specific frames
DON'T
- Write vague requirements: "the page should load fast" → "p95 < 2s"
- Combine multiple behaviors in one requirement
- Leave decisions open: "TBD" in approved PRDs is a blocker
- Describe implementation, only describe behavior
Stakeholder Sign-Off Process
Review Stages
1. Author Draft (Day 0)
→ Self-review against checklist below
2. Design Review (Day 1-2)
→ UX completeness, design feasibility
3. Engineering Review (Day 3-5)
→ Technical feasibility, estimates, NFRs
4. Data Review (Day 5-6)
→ Analytics plan completeness, metric definitions
5. Legal/Compliance (if needed, Day 5-7)
→ Privacy, regulatory requirements
6. PM/Leadership Approval (Day 7-10)
→ Priority alignment, resource commitment
7. Kickoff Meeting
→ All stakeholders aligned, questions resolved
PRD Self-Review Checklist
- Problem clearly stated with supporting evidence (qualitative + quantitative)
- Goals are outcomes, not outputs
- Success metrics have baseline and target values
- Non-goals explicitly listed
- All user roles/personas addressed
- Every functional requirement has at least one acceptance criterion
- All edge cases documented
- Error states defined
- NFRs specified (performance, availability, security)
- Analytics instrumentation plan included
- Dependencies on other teams identified
- Rollout plan defined (flag? % rollout? which segments?)
- Open questions resolved or assigned owners
PRD Status Definitions
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
Draft | Author working, not ready for review |
In Review | Circulating to stakeholders |
Revision Needed | Feedback received, author updating |
Approved | All required sign-offs obtained |
In Progress | Engineering actively building |
Shipped | Feature live in production |
Deprecated | Feature killed or superseded |
Minimal PRD (for small features)
For < 2 sprint features, use this lighter format:
## What
[1-2 sentence description]
## Why
[Problem + evidence]
## How (Behavior)
- [Bullet list of user-visible behaviors]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] AC1
- [ ] AC2
## Not included
- [Explicit scope exclusions]
## Metrics
- Primary: [metric]
- Secondary: [metric]
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.