Delegation patterns
When to activate: delegation, task handoff, trust building, ownership transfer, managing without micromanaging, empowerment, letting goFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack --skill delegation-patternsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
6.7 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Delegation Patterns
The Delegation Ladder (7 Levels)
| Level | Description | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Tell | You decide, they execute exactly | New hire, high-stakes, zero margin |
| 2 — Sell | You decide, you explain why | Building buy-in, teaching context |
| 3 — Consult | They propose, you decide | Building judgment, moderately experienced |
| 4 — Agree | You decide together | Peer-level decisions, shared ownership |
| 5 — Advise | They decide, they inform you before | Experienced, trust established |
| 6 — Inquire | They decide, they tell you after | High trust, senior person |
| 7 — Delegate | They decide, you find out if needed | Full autonomy, leadership-level |
Goal: Move each person up the ladder as they demonstrate competence and judgment.
Delegation Decision Matrix
Before delegating, assess two dimensions:
Skill
Low High
Will ┌─────────────┬──────────────┐
High │ Coach & │ Delegate │
│ Train │ fully │
├─────────────┼──────────────┤
Low │ Redirect / │ Motivate & │
│ Reassign │ Challenge │
└─────────────┴──────────────┘
- High skill, high will: Full delegation — get out of the way
- Low skill, high will: Coach and train — they want to learn, support them
- High skill, low will: Explore motivation — what would make this engaging?
- Low skill, low will: Don't delegate this task yet — address the root issue first
Task Handoff Template
## Task Handoff: [Task Name]
**Owner (new):** [Name]
**Delegating from:** [Your name]
**Due date:** [Date]
**Priority:** [High / Medium / Low]
**What success looks like:**
[Specific, measurable outcome — not activity, but result]
**Background context:**
[Why this matters, what came before, key constraints]
**Key stakeholders / dependencies:**
- [Who to loop in]
- [What they need]
**Decisions you can make independently:**
[Enumerate what's in their lane]
**Decisions that need my input:**
[Enumerate what requires escalation]
**Resources / references:**
- [Links, docs, tools]
**Check-in schedule:**
[How often + how — async update, brief sync, etc.]
**Definition of done:**
[Specific criteria to know the task is complete]
Context Transfer Checklist
Before handing off a task or project:
- Written summary of current state (not verbal only)
- List of all active stakeholders and their context
- Any known landmines, risks, or political sensitivities
- History of key decisions and why they were made
- Access to all relevant tools, docs, and systems
- Introductions to key people they'll need to work with
- Definition of done is agreed and written
- First check-in is scheduled
Trust-Building Progression
Trust is built incrementally. Use this sequence:
- Start small — delegate a low-stakes task to observe their approach
- Debrief together — what went well, what would they do differently?
- Increase stakes gradually — move up the ladder based on demonstrated judgment
- Give stretch assignments — tasks slightly beyond current comfort zone
- Reduce check-ins — as trust builds, move from sync to async updates
- Full ownership — they own the outcome, you're available for questions
Timeline: Trust is built in months, not days. Don't rush to full delegation before it's warranted.
Outcome vs. Method Ownership
Micromanagement trap: Delegating the outcome but controlling the method.
| Approach | Example | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Method control | "Do it this specific way" | Kills initiative, builds dependency |
| Outcome ownership | "Here's what success looks like — how you get there is yours" | Builds capability, engagement |
When to specify method:
- Safety or compliance requirements
- Team consistency matters (shared systems, interfaces)
- New hire learning the standard approach
When to leave method open:
- Experienced person
- Novel problem with no established playbook
- You want them to develop judgment
Tracking Without Micromanaging
Lightweight tracking mechanisms
- Async written update: "What's the status?" via Slack/doc — no meeting needed
- Milestone check-ins: Agree on 2-3 milestones upfront; only check at those points
- Exception reporting: "Tell me if X happens or if you're blocked" — otherwise no update needed
- Weekly standup: Brief written: done / doing / blocked
Questions that signal trust (not control)
- "What do you need from me to move forward?"
- "What's the hardest part right now?"
- "What would you do differently if you were starting over?"
- "Is there anything blocking you that I could help unblock?"
Red flags that invite more check-ins
- Missed milestone without proactive communication
- Stakeholders are surprised / not in the loop
- Quality issues appearing repeatedly
- Requests for help only after problems become critical
Common Delegation Failures
| Failure | Root cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Delegating but still doing | Fear of quality drop | Define "good enough" threshold explicitly |
| No clarity on outcome | Rushed handoff | Use handoff template every time |
| Delegating to wrong person | Ignoring skill/will matrix | Assess before assigning |
| Checking in too often | Low trust or anxiety | Agree on check-in cadence upfront |
| Not delegating because "faster to do myself" | Short-term thinking | Calculate time cost of not developing others |
| Delegating blame not authority | Not giving real ownership | Transfer authority alongside responsibility |
When NOT to Delegate
- The task is truly yours as a leader (final decision, accountability)
- Crisis situation where speed matters more than development
- Confidential information that shouldn't be shared
- Task requires your specific expertise that can't be transferred
- The person is already overloaded — delegation becomes a burden
Delegation Review
Ask monthly:
- What am I still doing that someone else could do at 80% quality?
- Who on my team is ready for more ownership?
- What did I delegate this month that went well?
- What delegation failed — what can I learn from it?
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.