Process design
Skill Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack/plugins/devtools-pack/skills/process-design
When to activate: business process mapping, BPMN diagrams, swimlane flows, SLA design, bottleneck identification, process automation, workflow documentation, SOPsFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack --skill process-designAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
7.2 KB, ~1.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Business Process Design
Process Discovery Framework
Step 1 — Define Scope
- Start point: what triggers the process?
- End point: what is the final deliverable or state?
- Owners: who is accountable for the end-to-end outcome?
- Stakeholders: who participates or is affected?
- Frequency: how often does this run? (per transaction / daily / weekly)
Step 2 — As-Is Mapping (Current State)
- Interview process owners and frontline operators separately
- Shadow the process live — don't rely on documentation alone
- Capture every handoff: where work moves between people or systems
- Note informal fixes, workarounds, and shadow tools
- Record timing for each step (optimistic / typical / worst case)
Step 3 — Bottleneck Analysis
| Signal | Likely bottleneck |
|---|---|
| Work piles up before a step | Capacity constraint at that step |
| Long wait times between steps | Approval dependency or unclear ownership |
| High rework rates | Ambiguous inputs or missing specifications |
| Frequent escalations | Decision authority not delegated low enough |
| Duplicate work across teams | Missing single source of truth |
Step 4 — To-Be Design
- Remove: steps that add no value from the customer perspective
- Automate: repetitive, rule-based steps with structured inputs
- Simplify: steps that require judgment but could be standardized
- Parallel: steps currently sequential that have no true dependency
- Delegate: decisions pushed too high that could be made at execution level
BPMN Notation Quick Reference
Core Symbols
| Symbol | Name | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Circle (thin) | Start Event | Process begins |
| Circle (thick) | End Event | Process ends |
| Rounded rectangle | Task | Work performed by an actor |
| Diamond | Gateway | Decision or fork point |
| Rectangle with lines | Sub-Process | Collapsed complex process |
| Dashed arrow | Message Flow | Communication between pools |
| Solid arrow | Sequence Flow | Task ordering |
Gateway Types
- Exclusive (X) — one path taken, based on condition
- Parallel (+) — all paths taken simultaneously
- Inclusive (O) — one or more paths based on condition
Swimlane Structure
Pool: [Company]
Lane: [Sales] → owns deal qualification, proposal
Lane: [Legal] → owns contract review, redlines
Lane: [Finance] → owns deal desk approval, invoicing
Lane: [Customer] → external participant (dashed pool)
SLA Design
SLA Template
Process: [Name]
SLA Owner: [Role]
Measurement period: [daily / weekly / monthly]
Tier 1 — Standard:
Target: respond within 4 business hours
Resolution: within 2 business days
Applies to: [low-priority tickets / routine requests]
Tier 2 — Priority:
Target: respond within 1 business hour
Resolution: within 4 business hours
Applies to: [high-value accounts / escalations]
Tier 3 — Critical:
Target: respond within 15 minutes
Resolution: within 2 hours
Applies to: [production outages / revenue-blocking issues]
SLA Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Target |
|---|---|---|
| SLA Attainment | # tickets resolved within SLA / total tickets | ≥ 95% |
| MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) | Total resolution time / # tickets | Per tier target |
| Breach Rate | # SLA breaches / total tickets | < 5% |
| Escalation Rate | # escalated / total tickets | < 10% |
Automation Opportunity Assessment
Automation Readiness Checklist
- Input is structured or can be made structured
- Rules for processing are explicit and documented
- Exceptions are predictable and < 15% of volume
- Process runs frequently enough to justify build cost
- Regulatory requirements allow automation
- Rollback plan exists if automation fails
Automation ROI Formula
Annual manual cost = (avg minutes per case / 60) × hourly rate × annual volume
Automation cost = build cost + annual maintenance
Break-even = automation cost / (annual manual cost - automation run cost)
Priority Matrix
| Frequency | Manual effort | Automation priority |
|---|---|---|
| High | High | P0 — automate immediately |
| High | Low | P2 — consider if low build cost |
| Low | High | P1 — automate or outsource |
| Low | Low | P3 — leave manual |
Process Documentation Standard
SOP Structure
Title: [Process Name]
Version: 1.x
Owner: [Role]
Last reviewed: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Next review: [YYYY-MM-DD]
1. Purpose
One sentence: what does this process accomplish?
2. Scope
Who does this apply to? What is included / excluded?
3. Inputs
List required inputs, formats, and source systems.
4. Steps
Step 1: [Action] → [Actor] → [Output/Artifact]
Step 2: ...
5. Decision points
If [condition] → go to step X
If [condition] → escalate to [Role]
6. Outputs
List deliverables, where they are stored, who receives them.
7. Exceptions
Document known edge cases and handling procedures.
8. Related documents
Link to: upstream processes, downstream processes, policy docs.
Document Control
- Store in single authoritative location (wiki, Notion, Confluence)
- Assign a process owner responsible for quarterly review
- Version with date + author in header
- Archive superseded versions — don't delete
Process Improvement Methodologies
Lean — Waste Categories (TIMWOOD)
- Transportation — moving information unnecessarily
- Inventory — work items waiting in queues
- Motion — people navigating between systems
- Waiting — idle time between steps
- Over-production — producing more than needed
- Over-processing — more steps than required
- Defects — errors requiring rework
Six Sigma DMAIC
- Define — charter, SIPOC, voice of customer
- Measure — baseline current performance, collect data
- Analyze — root cause analysis (fishbone, 5-why)
- Improve — pilot improvements, validate with data
- Control — standardize, hand off with monitoring plan
Kaizen Event Structure (5-day)
| Day | Activity |
|---|---|
| 1 | Current state mapping, problem definition |
| 2 | Root cause analysis, solution brainstorm |
| 3 | Pilot and test solutions |
| 4 | Implement and document |
| 5 | Report out, set 30-day follow-up actions |
Governance
Process Review Cadence
| Process type | Review frequency |
|---|---|
| Customer-facing | Quarterly |
| Regulatory / compliance | Annually (or when regulation changes) |
| Internal operational | Semi-annually |
| Incident-driven | After every major incident |
Change Control
- Submit process change request with: what, why, impact assessment
- Review by process owner + key stakeholders
- Pilot on limited scope before full rollout
- Update documentation before go-live
- Communicate to all affected parties
- Monitor for 30 days post-change
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.