Ux research
Skill Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack/plugins/devtools-pack/skills/ux-research
A curated pack of custom Claude Code skills for developers — installable as a Claude Code plugin marketplace.
npx -y skills add Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack --skill ux-researchAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
When to activate: user research, UX research, user interviews, usability testing, surveys, diary studies, research plan, synthesis, insight
SKILL.md
6.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
UX Research
Research Method Selection
| Method | Question Type | Sample Size | Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| User interviews | Why/how | 5-8 | 1-2 weeks | Discovery, problem validation |
| Usability tests | Can users do X? | 5-8 | 1-2 weeks | Design validation |
| Surveys | How many? How often? | 100+ | 1-2 weeks | Quantitative validation |
| Diary studies | What do they do over time? | 10-20 | 2-4 weeks | Longitudinal behavior |
| Card sorting | How do users categorize? | 20-30 | 1 week | IA, navigation |
| Tree testing | Can users find X in nav? | 50+ | 1 week | Navigation validation |
| A/B test | Which performs better? | 1000+ | 2-4 weeks | Optimization |
| Session recordings | What do users actually do? | 50-200 | Ongoing | Behavior observation |
Research Plan Template
# Research Plan: [Study Name]
**Researcher**: [Name]
**Date**: [Start – End]
**Product Area**: [Feature/Flow]
## Research Questions
1. [Primary question — the most important thing to learn]
2. [Secondary question]
3. [Secondary question]
## Hypotheses
- H1: We believe [users] struggle with [X] because [reason]
- H2: We believe [Y feature] will help because [assumption]
## Method
[Selected method + rationale]
## Participants
- Target: [Persona/segment description]
- Criteria: [Screener criteria]
- Recruitment: [Source — panel, CRM, Craigslist, etc.]
- Incentive: [$X gift card / product credit]
- N: [Number of participants]
## Schedule
- Recruitment: [Dates]
- Sessions: [Dates, duration each]
- Analysis: [Dates]
- Readout: [Date]
## Materials
- [ ] Discussion guide / test script
- [ ] Prototype / test environment
- [ ] Screener survey
- [ ] Consent form
- [ ] Recording setup (Maze/Lookback/Zoom)
User Interview Guide
Structure (60-minute interview)
0:00-0:05 Introduction & consent
0:05-0:15 Warm-up: background, context, workflow
0:15-0:45 Core questions (problem space)
0:45-0:55 Concept/prototype reaction (if applicable)
0:55-1:00 Wrap-up: anything else? recruiting referrals
Interview Question Bank
Warm-up
- Tell me about your role and what a typical [relevant task] looks like for you.
- How long have you been doing [X]?
- Walk me through the last time you [relevant activity].
Problem Discovery
- What's the hardest part of [task]?
- What does your current workflow look like? Take me through it step by step.
- What tools do you use? What do you wish they did differently?
- If you could wave a magic wand and fix one thing, what would it be?
- Tell me about a time when [problem area] didn't go as expected.
Behavior & Motivation
- Why do you do it that way?
- What would have to be true for you to change how you do this?
- Who else is involved in this decision/process?
- How do you know when you've done [task] successfully?
Reaction to Concept (show prototype)
- What's your first impression?
- What would you expect to happen if you clicked [X]?
- Is anything confusing or unclear?
- What would make you trust/use this?
Interview Anti-Patterns
- Don't ask leading questions: "Don't you find X frustrating?" → "How do you feel about X?"
- Don't ask hypotheticals: "Would you use this?" → "Tell me about the last time you..."
- Don't ask binary yes/no → follow up with "tell me more"
- Don't jump to solutions → stay in problem space longer
Usability Testing Protocol
Moderated Test Script
"Thank you for joining. Today I'm going to ask you to complete
some tasks using [product/prototype]. I want to be clear: we're
testing the design, not you. There are no wrong answers.
Please think aloud — say what you're thinking and looking at.
I won't be able to answer questions about how to use it, but
I want to hear what you'd expect."
[Task 1]
"Please [task instruction]. Think aloud as you go."
Observe: where do they start? where do they pause? where do they go wrong?
[After each task]
"How was that? What was easy/hard?"
"What did you expect to happen when you clicked X?"
Metrics to Track
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Task success rate | % completing without assistance | >80% |
| Time on task | Seconds to complete | <baseline |
| Error rate | # of errors per task | <2 |
| SUS score | System Usability Scale (0-100) | >68 |
| NPS | Would recommend (0-10) | >30 |
Research Synthesis Frameworks
Affinity Mapping
- Capture every observation on individual sticky notes (digital: FigJam, Miro)
- Sort silently — group related notes without discussing
- Label clusters with insight statements (not categories)
- Identify patterns across clusters
- Prioritize by frequency and severity
Jobs-to-Be-Done Analysis
Functional Job: [What they're trying to accomplish]
Emotional Job: [How they want to feel]
Social Job: [How they want to be perceived]
Outcome Statements:
"Minimize the time it takes to [functional outcome]"
"Increase the likelihood of [desired result]"
"Reduce the number of [pain point occurrences]"
Problem Statement Format
[User persona] needs a way to [accomplish goal]
because [insight about their motivation/context].
Currently they [current behavior] which leads to [pain/inefficiency].
We know this because [evidence — N participants, quote, data].
Insight Documentation Template
## Insight: [Short title]
**Confidence**: High | Medium | Low
**Evidence**: [N/X participants mentioned this] [quote]
**Impact**: [What this means for the product]
**Recommendation**: [What we should do about it]
### Supporting Quotes
> "[Direct quote from participant]" — P3, SMB Customer
### Related Insights
- [Link to related insight]
Research Repository Structure
research/
├── studies/
│ └── 2024-Q1-onboarding/
│ ├── plan.md
│ ├── guide.md
│ ├── raw-notes/
│ ├── synthesis.md
│ └── readout.pdf
├── insights/
│ ├── onboarding-insights.md
│ ├── retention-insights.md
│ └── enterprise-insights.md
└── participants/
└── (PII-protected, consent on file)
Participant Recruitment Checklist
- Screener survey written and tested
- Recruitment source identified (own users, panel, LinkedIn)
- Incentive approved (typically $75-150/hr for professionals)
- Scheduling tool set up (Calendly)
- Consent form prepared (recording consent)
- Over-recruit by 20% (no-shows)
- Confirm 24h before each session