Strategy frameworks
A curated pack of custom Claude Code skills for developers — installable as a Claude Code plugin marketplace.
npx -y skills add Mattakushi432/Claude-Code-Skills-Custom-DevTools-Pack --skill strategy-frameworksAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
When to activate: corporate strategy, Porter's 5 Forces, Blue Ocean, BCG Matrix, Ansoff Matrix, Balanced Scorecard, SWOT, strategic planning, scenario planning, strategic narrative
SKILL.md
7.2 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Strategy Frameworks
Porter's Five Forces
Assesses industry attractiveness and competitive position.
| Force | Key Questions |
|---|---|
| Threat of new entrants | Capital requirements, switching costs, brand loyalty, regulatory barriers |
| Bargaining power of suppliers | Supplier concentration, switching costs, importance of input |
| Bargaining power of buyers | Buyer concentration, price sensitivity, switching costs |
| Threat of substitutes | Relative price-performance of alternatives, switching costs |
| Competitive rivalry | Number of competitors, industry growth rate, product differentiation |
Output: Rate each force (Low/Medium/High) → determine overall attractiveness → identify strategic moves.
Blue Ocean Strategy
Move from red oceans (fierce competition) to blue oceans (uncontested space).
ERRC Grid (Eliminate-Reduce-Raise-Create)
Eliminate: Which factors the industry takes for granted should be eliminated?
Reduce: Which factors should be reduced well below industry standard?
Raise: Which factors should be raised well above industry standard?
Create: Which factors the industry has never offered should be created?
Four-Action Framework
- Eliminate factors that no longer add value
- Reduce factors over-engineered beyond customer needs
- Raise factors underserved by the industry
- Create new value drivers customers have never been offered
Value Curve
Plot your strategy canvas: x-axis = competitive factors, y-axis = level of offering. A compelling blue ocean has a distinct curve vs. competitors.
BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Portfolio analysis tool for multi-business companies.
High Market Share Low Market Share
High Growth | Stars | Question Marks |
Low Growth | Cash Cows | Dogs |
Stars: Invest to maintain leadership; may become cash cows. Cash Cows: Maximize cash generation; fund other units. Question Marks: Decide invest-or-divest based on strategic fit. Dogs: Divest or harvest unless strategic rationale exists.
Ansoff Matrix
Growth strategy framework.
Existing Products New Products
Existing Markets | Market Penetration | Product Development |
New Markets | Market Development | Diversification |
- Market Penetration: Increase share in existing markets. Lowest risk.
- Market Development: Enter new segments or geographies. Moderate risk.
- Product Development: New products to existing customers. Moderate risk.
- Diversification: New products, new markets. Highest risk; needs clear rationale.
Balanced Scorecard
Translate strategy into operational terms across four perspectives:
1. Financial Perspective
- Revenue growth rate
- Profit margins (gross, EBITDA, net)
- Return on invested capital (ROIC)
- Cash flow generation
2. Customer Perspective
- Market share
- Customer satisfaction (NPS, CSAT)
- Customer retention rate
- Customer lifetime value (LTV)
3. Internal Processes Perspective
- Operational efficiency metrics
- Product development cycle time
- Quality defect rates
- Time-to-market
4. Learning & Growth Perspective
- Employee engagement
- Skills gap closure rate
- Innovation pipeline (new ideas → implemented)
- Technology infrastructure investments
Cascade: Corporate BSC → Business Unit BSC → Team OKRs → Individual goals
SWOT Analysis
Internal | Positive | Negative
| Strengths | Weaknesses
----------------|-----------------|------------------
External | Opportunities | Threats
How to use SWOT strategically (TOWS Matrix):
- SO (Maxi-Maxi): Use strengths to capture opportunities
- WO (Mini-Maxi): Overcome weaknesses by pursuing opportunities
- ST (Maxi-Mini): Use strengths to mitigate threats
- WT (Mini-Mini): Defensive tactics to minimize weaknesses and avoid threats
Strategic Planning Process
Annual Cycle
Q4 (Oct-Dec): Strategic review → Q1 (Jan-Mar): Plan finalization + OKR setting
Q2-Q3: Execution + quarterly business reviews (QBRs)
Q3 (Jul-Sep): Mid-year strategic refresh
Strategic Planning Steps
- Environmental scan — PESTLE + Porter's 5 Forces
- Internal assessment — Core competencies, resource audit
- Strategic options — Generate 3-5 strategic directions
- Strategic choice — Evaluate options; select 1-2
- Strategy articulation — Write the strategic narrative (1-page)
- Cascade — OKRs, resource allocation, roadmaps
- Monitor — Quarterly business reviews (QBRs), strategy checkpoints
Scenario Planning
Used when high uncertainty makes single-path forecasting unreliable.
Steps
- Define the focal question — e.g., "What is our market position in 5 years?"
- Identify driving forces — macro forces affecting the focal question
- Rank by impact × uncertainty — select top 2 critical uncertainties
- Build 4 scenarios — 2×2 matrix with the two critical uncertainties as axes
- Name and narrative — Give each scenario a vivid name and story
- Test strategy — Does your current strategy survive all 4 scenarios?
- Early warning indicators — Define signals indicating which scenario is unfolding
2×2 Scenario Matrix
High [Uncertainty A]
| |
| S3 | S1
High [B] |---------|--------
| S4 | S2
| |
Low [Uncertainty A]
Strategic Narrative (One-Page Strategy)
Template:
Where we play: [Target market/segment description]
How we win: [Value proposition / differentiation]
Capabilities needed: [3-4 core capabilities required]
Management systems: [Metrics, cadences, incentives]
What we must stop: [Activities that don't fit the strategy]
Strategy Pitfalls to Avoid
- Strategy as aspiration: "Be the best" is not a strategy. Strategy requires choices.
- Boiling the ocean: Trying to pursue too many strategic directions simultaneously.
- Ignoring implementation: Great strategy + poor execution = nothing.
- Analysis paralysis: Strategy needs enough data but also conviction.
- Strategy as a document: Strategy lives in decisions and resource allocation, not PDFs.
Strategy Review Checklist
- Does the strategy make clear choices about what NOT to do?
- Is the differentiation specific and defensible?
- Do resource allocation decisions reflect the stated strategy?
- Are OKRs directly derived from strategic priorities?
- Is the strategy communicated in a way the team can act on?
- Does the strategy account for the top 3 competitive threats?
- Is there a clear link between strategy and financial targets?