Semantic policy audit
Skill matt-bat/agent-command-center/skills/semantic-policy-audit
Audit whether a task descriptor, selected skills, authority, gates, artifacts, execution, and completion claims semantically match user intent and actual effects. Use for policy-system audits or high-confidence governed review; do not use for ordinary implementation or mechanical schema checks.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add matt-bat/agent-command-center --skill semantic-policy-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, 660 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Semantic Policy Audit
Quick Index (Action-Routed)
Read First (All Actions)
MissionTrigger RuleScope Boundary
Action Modules (Read As Needed)
- Performing intent-level audits:
Audit DimensionsAudit Workflow
- Reporting compliance gaps:
Output Contract
Mission
Detect policy drift that passes simple text checks but fails intent-level correctness.
Trigger Rule
Use this skill when:
- a policy or routing system itself is being audited for intent-level correctness
- governed work requires an explicit high-confidence semantic review beyond mechanical checks
- governance artifacts exist but their applicability or evidence claims are uncertain
- the user requests a strict semantic policy or compliance review
Do not use merely because:
- an implementation touches several files or selects several skills
- a task is ordinary implementation with no policy-conformance decision
- schema, snippet, or command checks fully answer the validation question
Scope Boundary
This skill audits semantic correctness.
Use Governance Enforcement for:
- mechanical/script-based validation execution
Audit Dimensions
- intent-to-skill alignment:
- requested task intent matches selected skills
- action and operational effect are classified separately from topic words
- gate applicability alignment:
- required/conditional gates are actually appropriate
- mandatory safety gates are not suppressed by budgets
- declaration-to-execution alignment:
- startup declaration reflects true execution path
- status-to-evidence alignment:
- artifacts claim only what evidence supports
- policy conflict detection:
- identify contradictory instructions across policy docs/skills
- authority and mutation alignment:
- every write, external action, or irreversible effect has matching authority
- response-composition alignment:
- deliverables, prohibitions, must-surface evidence, and vetoes survive final composition
Audit Workflow
- ingest the task descriptor, selected skills, governance artifacts, execution evidence, and key docs
- derive expected skills/gates from action, effects, authority, and material uncertainty
- compare expected vs declared/applied
- classify gaps:
missing_skillextra_skillmissing_gatemisapplied_gateevidence_mismatchpolicy_conflict
- provide corrective actions with minimal disruption
Read-only audits must not update policy, trackers, indexes, or governance artifacts unless the user separately authorizes remediation.
Output Contract
When applying this skill, provide:
- expected-vs-observed matrix
- gap classification list
- severity per gap (
low/medium/high) - remediation plan and residual risk
Related Skills
- Skill Governance: source policy and risk model.
- Governance Enforcement: executes validator scripts.
- Thoroughly Rate Review: weighted scoring when audit results need a formal score.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.