Solve challenge
Solves CTF challenges by analyzing files, connecting to services, and applying exploitation techniques. Orchestrates category-specific CTF skills for pwn, crypto, web, reverse engineering, forensics, OSINT, malware analysis, and miscellaneous challenges. Use when given a CTF challenge to solve, a challenge file to analyze, or a service endpoint to exploit.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add MateoBogo/CLEAVE --skill solve-challengeAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.9 KB, ~1.9k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
CTF Challenge Solver
You're a skilled CTF player. Your goal is to solve the challenge and find the flag.
Workflow
Step 0: Auto-triage (run this FIRST, before guessing category)
bash /home/ubuntu/.claude/skills/ctf-automation/triage.sh <challenge-dir>
triage.sh fingerprints binaries, detects language manifests, spots crypto/forensics/AI artefacts, and writes <dir>/.ctf-triage.md with direct pointers into ctf-*/SKILL.md#pattern-recognition-index. The markdown report tells you which skill(s) to load — do NOT guess the category from the user prompt or the challenge title.
Read <dir>/.ctf-triage.md, collect the pointers, and dispatch on those. If triage found no artefacts (exit 3), fall back to Step 1.
Step 1: Recon
- Explore files -- List the challenge directory, run
file *on everything - Triage binaries --
strings,xxd | head,binwalk,checksecon binaries - Fetch links -- If the challenge mentions URLs, fetch them FIRST for context
- Connect -- Try remote services (
nc) to understand what they expect - Read hints -- Challenge descriptions, filenames, and comments often contain clues
Step 2: Categorize
Determine the primary category, then invoke the matching skill.
By file type:
.pcap,.pcapng,.evtx,.raw,.dd,.E01-> forensics.elf,.exe,.so,.dll, binary with no extension -> reverse or pwn (check if remote service provided -- if yes, likely pwn).py,.sage,.txtwith numbers -> crypto.apk,.wasm,.pyc-> reverse- Web URL or source code with HTML/JS/PHP/templates -> web
- Images, audio, PDFs with no obvious content -> forensics (steganography)
By challenge description keywords:
- "buffer overflow", "ROP", "shellcode", "libc", "heap" -> pwn
- "RSA", "AES", "cipher", "encrypt", "prime", "modulus", "lattice", "LWE", "GCM" -> crypto
- "XSS", "SQL", "injection", "cookie", "JWT", "SSRF" -> web
- "disk image", "memory dump", "packet capture", "registry", "power trace", "side-channel", "spectrogram", "audio tracks", "MKV" -> forensics
- "find", "locate", "identify", "who", "where" -> osint
- "obfuscated", "packed", "C2", "malware", "beacon" -> malware
- "jail", "sandbox", "escape", "encoding", "signal", "game", "Nim", "commitment", "Gray code" -> misc
By service behavior:
- Port with interactive prompt, crash on long input -> pwn
- HTTP service -> web
- netcat with math/crypto puzzles -> crypto
- netcat with restricted shell or eval -> misc (jail)
Step 3: Invoke the Category Skill
Once you identify the category, invoke the matching skill to get specialized techniques:
| Category | Invoke | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Web | /ctf-web | XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, JWT, file uploads, prototype pollution |
| Pwn | /ctf-pwn | Buffer overflow, format string, heap, ROP, sandbox escape |
| App-System | /ctf-app-system | Root-Me app-system via SSH: ELF x86/x64/ARM64, Windows Kernel x64, ret2libc remote, libc fingerprint, IOCTL, token stealing |
| Crypto | /ctf-crypto | RSA, AES, ECC, PRNG, ZKP, classical ciphers |
| Reverse | /ctf-reverse | Binary analysis, game clients, VMs, obfuscated code |
| Forensics | /ctf-forensics | Disk images, memory dumps, event logs, stego, network captures |
| OSINT | /ctf-osint | Social media, geolocation, DNS, public records |
| Malware | /ctf-malware | Obfuscated scripts, C2 traffic, PE/.NET analysis |
| Misc | /ctf-misc | Jails, encodings, RF/SDR, esoteric languages, constraint solving |
| Automation | /ctf-automation | One-shot triage + per-category setup scripts (pwnsetup, cryptosetup, websetup, foreniq, aiprobe) |
You can also invoke /ctf-<category> to load the full skill instructions with detailed techniques.
Dispatch rule: if .ctf-triage.md pointed to a specific section like ctf-pwn/advanced-exploits-2.md#mop, open that file directly — do not re-classify via prose clues.
Step 4: Pivot When Stuck
If your first approach doesn't work:
- Re-examine assumptions -- Is this really the category you think? A "web" challenge might need crypto for JWT forgery. A "forensics" PCAP might contain a pwn exploit to replay.
- Try a different category skill -- Many challenges span multiple categories. Invoke a second skill for the cross-cutting technique.
- Look for what you missed -- Hidden files, alternate ports, response headers, comments in source, metadata in images.
- Simplify -- If an exploit is too complex, check if there's a simpler path (default creds, known CVE, logic bug).
- Check edge cases -- Off-by-one, race conditions, integer overflow, encoding mismatches.
Common multi-category patterns:
- Forensics + Crypto: encrypted data in PCAP/disk image, need crypto to decrypt
- Web + Reverse: WASM or obfuscated JS in web challenge
- Web + Crypto: JWT forgery, custom MAC/signature schemes
- Reverse + Pwn: reverse the binary first, then exploit the vulnerability
- Forensics + OSINT: recover data from dump, then trace it via public sources
- Misc + Crypto: jail escape requires building crypto primitives under constraints
- OSINT + Stego: social media posts with unicode homoglyph steganography (Cyrillic lookalikes encode bits)
- Web + Forensics: paywall bypass (curl reveals content hidden by CSS overlays)
- Misc + Crypto + Game Theory: multi-phase interactive challenges with AES decryption → HMAC commitment → combinatorial game solving (GF(256) Nim)
- Crypto + Geometry + Lattice: multi-layer challenges progressing from spatial reconstruction → subspace recovery → LWE solving → AES-GCM decryption
- Forensics + Signal Processing: power traces / side-channel analysis requiring statistical analysis of measurement data
- Forensics + Network + Encoding: timing-based encoding in PCAP (inter-packet intervals encode binary data)
Flag Formats
Flags vary by CTF. Common formats:
flag{...},FLAG{...},CTF{...},TEAM{...}- Custom prefixes: check the challenge description or CTF rules for the format (e.g.,
ENO{...},HTB{...},picoCTF{...}) - Sometimes just a plaintext string with no wrapper
Validation rule (important):
- If you find multiple flag-like strings, treat them as candidates and validate before finalizing.
- Prefer the token tied to the intended artifact/workflow (not random metadata noise or obvious decoys).
- Do a corpus-wide uniqueness check and include the source file/path when reporting.
# Search for common flag patterns in files
grep -rniE '(flag|ctf|eno|htb|pico)\{' .
# Search in binary/memory output
strings output.bin | grep -iE '\{.*\}'
Quick Reference
# Recon
file * # Identify file types
strings binary | grep -i flag # Quick string search
xxd binary | head -20 # Hex dump header
binwalk -e firmware.bin # Extract embedded files
checksec --file=binary # Check binary protections
# Connect
nc host port # Connect to challenge
echo -e "answer1\nanswer2" | nc host port # Scripted input
curl -v http://host:port/ # HTTP recon
# Python exploit template
python3 -c "
from pwn import *
r = remote('host', port)
r.interactive()
"
Challenge
$ARGUMENTS
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most research analysis skills give in ~1.9k tokens
Counted across 1,063 of the 1,754 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Generate a markdown reportin 32 of 1063, across 23 files
- Cite each claim's sourcein 30 of 1063, across 15 files
- Define the ideal customer profilein 20 of 1063, across 2 files
- Search for companies matching the criteriain 20 of 1063, across 2 files
- Assign a fit score from one to tenin 20 of 1063, across 2 files
- Analyze the codebase to understand the productin 19 of 1063, across 1 file
- Ask clarifying questions about the value propositionin 19 of 1063, across 1 file
- Look for signals of immediate needin 19 of 1063, across 1 file
- Identify the target decision maker rolein 19 of 1063, across 1 file
- Suggest a personalized contact strategyin 19 of 1063, across 1 file
- Provide conversation starters for outreachin 19 of 1063, across 1 file
- Format results in a scannable markdown templatein 19 of 1063, across 1 file
Said here and by no other author read
- run triage script before guessing category
- read triage report and dispatch on its pointers
- explore files and run file command on everything
- triage binaries with strings and checksec
- fetch urls mentioned in the challenge first
- connect to remote services to understand expectations
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.